Cargando…

Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

This study examined the prognostic value of the baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The associations between RDW and clinical characteristics were assessed in 161 DLBCL patients from 2005 to 2016. The log-rank test, univariate analysis,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Shujuan, Fang, Fang, Chen, Huiyao, Zhang, Wei, Chen, Yang, Shi, Yifen, Zheng, Zhouyi, Ma, Yongyong, Tang, Liyuan, Feng, Jianhua, Zhang, Yu, Sun, Lan, Chen, Yi, Liang, Bin, Yu, Kang, Jiang, Songfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388534
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16560
_version_ 1783252122133856256
author Zhou, Shujuan
Fang, Fang
Chen, Huiyao
Zhang, Wei
Chen, Yang
Shi, Yifen
Zheng, Zhouyi
Ma, Yongyong
Tang, Liyuan
Feng, Jianhua
Zhang, Yu
Sun, Lan
Chen, Yi
Liang, Bin
Yu, Kang
Jiang, Songfu
author_facet Zhou, Shujuan
Fang, Fang
Chen, Huiyao
Zhang, Wei
Chen, Yang
Shi, Yifen
Zheng, Zhouyi
Ma, Yongyong
Tang, Liyuan
Feng, Jianhua
Zhang, Yu
Sun, Lan
Chen, Yi
Liang, Bin
Yu, Kang
Jiang, Songfu
author_sort Zhou, Shujuan
collection PubMed
description This study examined the prognostic value of the baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The associations between RDW and clinical characteristics were assessed in 161 DLBCL patients from 2005 to 2016. The log-rank test, univariate analysis, and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between RDW and survival. A RDW of 14.1% was considered to be the optimal cut-off value for predicting prognosis. A high RDW was associated with more frequent B symptoms (P=0.001), a higher International Prognostic Index score (P=0.032), more extranodal sites of disease (P=0.035), and significantly lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P=0.031). The log-rank test demonstrated that patients with a high RDW had a shorter overall survival (OS) (2-year OS rate, 53.6% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (2-year PFS rate, 44.7% vs. 81.8%, P<0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that RDW ≥14.1% was an independent predictor of OS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.345, P<0.001) and PFS (OR = 0.393, P=0.001). We demonstrated that a high RDW predicted an unfavorable prognosis in patients with DLBCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55222052017-08-21 Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients Zhou, Shujuan Fang, Fang Chen, Huiyao Zhang, Wei Chen, Yang Shi, Yifen Zheng, Zhouyi Ma, Yongyong Tang, Liyuan Feng, Jianhua Zhang, Yu Sun, Lan Chen, Yi Liang, Bin Yu, Kang Jiang, Songfu Oncotarget Research Paper This study examined the prognostic value of the baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The associations between RDW and clinical characteristics were assessed in 161 DLBCL patients from 2005 to 2016. The log-rank test, univariate analysis, and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between RDW and survival. A RDW of 14.1% was considered to be the optimal cut-off value for predicting prognosis. A high RDW was associated with more frequent B symptoms (P=0.001), a higher International Prognostic Index score (P=0.032), more extranodal sites of disease (P=0.035), and significantly lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P=0.031). The log-rank test demonstrated that patients with a high RDW had a shorter overall survival (OS) (2-year OS rate, 53.6% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (2-year PFS rate, 44.7% vs. 81.8%, P<0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that RDW ≥14.1% was an independent predictor of OS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.345, P<0.001) and PFS (OR = 0.393, P=0.001). We demonstrated that a high RDW predicted an unfavorable prognosis in patients with DLBCL. Impact Journals LLC 2017-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5522205/ /pubmed/28388534 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16560 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Zhou et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhou, Shujuan
Fang, Fang
Chen, Huiyao
Zhang, Wei
Chen, Yang
Shi, Yifen
Zheng, Zhouyi
Ma, Yongyong
Tang, Liyuan
Feng, Jianhua
Zhang, Yu
Sun, Lan
Chen, Yi
Liang, Bin
Yu, Kang
Jiang, Songfu
Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title_full Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title_short Prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
title_sort prognostic significance of the red blood cell distribution width in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28388534
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16560
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoushujuan prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT fangfang prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT chenhuiyao prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT zhangwei prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT chenyang prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT shiyifen prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT zhengzhouyi prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT mayongyong prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT tangliyuan prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT fengjianhua prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT zhangyu prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT sunlan prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT chenyi prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT liangbin prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT yukang prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients
AT jiangsongfu prognosticsignificanceoftheredbloodcelldistributionwidthindiffuselargebcelllymphomapatients