Cargando…

Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study

In the overall management of the most chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus (DM), adherence to recommended disease-related self-care activities is of paramount importance. The diagnosis and presence of a chronic disease may be considered a difficult and stressful situation in life, a situati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albai, Alin, Sima, Alexandra, Papava, Ion, Roman, Deiana, Andor, Bogdan, Gafencu, Mihai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761336
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S140146
_version_ 1783252222677614592
author Albai, Alin
Sima, Alexandra
Papava, Ion
Roman, Deiana
Andor, Bogdan
Gafencu, Mihai
author_facet Albai, Alin
Sima, Alexandra
Papava, Ion
Roman, Deiana
Andor, Bogdan
Gafencu, Mihai
author_sort Albai, Alin
collection PubMed
description In the overall management of the most chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus (DM), adherence to recommended disease-related self-care activities is of paramount importance. The diagnosis and presence of a chronic disease may be considered a difficult and stressful situation in life, a situation in which coping mechanisms are psychological processes developed at a conscious level to manage these situations. This study aimed to explore the possible relationship between the dominance of one of the four major coping styles and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities (DRSCAs) in the population of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). In a cross-sectional consecutive-case population-based study design, 126 patients previously diagnosed with T2DM were enrolled. Coping mechanisms were evaluated using the Cope scale inventory, which identifies the dominant coping mechanism: problem-, emotion-, social support-, or avoidance-focused. The quality of DRSCA was evaluated using the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire, in which a higher score was associated with improved adherence. In the study cohort, 45 patients (35.7%) had problem-focused coping, 37 (29.4%) had emotion-focused coping, 32 (25.4%) social support-focused coping, and 12 (9.5%) had avoidance-focused coping. Patients with emotion-focused coping had the highest level (P=0.02) of DRSCA (median 44 points), followed by patients with social support-focused coping (median 40 points) and problem-focused coping (median 36 points), while patients with avoidance-focused coping had the lowest SDSCA total score (33 points). The type of dominant coping mechanism has a significant impact on the quality of the DRSCA measures implemented by the patient to manage their diabetes. Patients with emotion-focused and social support-focused coping styles tend to have significantly increased adherence to DRSCA scores, while patients with other dominant coping styles are less interested in managing their disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55228172017-07-31 Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study Albai, Alin Sima, Alexandra Papava, Ion Roman, Deiana Andor, Bogdan Gafencu, Mihai Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research In the overall management of the most chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus (DM), adherence to recommended disease-related self-care activities is of paramount importance. The diagnosis and presence of a chronic disease may be considered a difficult and stressful situation in life, a situation in which coping mechanisms are psychological processes developed at a conscious level to manage these situations. This study aimed to explore the possible relationship between the dominance of one of the four major coping styles and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities (DRSCAs) in the population of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). In a cross-sectional consecutive-case population-based study design, 126 patients previously diagnosed with T2DM were enrolled. Coping mechanisms were evaluated using the Cope scale inventory, which identifies the dominant coping mechanism: problem-, emotion-, social support-, or avoidance-focused. The quality of DRSCA was evaluated using the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire, in which a higher score was associated with improved adherence. In the study cohort, 45 patients (35.7%) had problem-focused coping, 37 (29.4%) had emotion-focused coping, 32 (25.4%) social support-focused coping, and 12 (9.5%) had avoidance-focused coping. Patients with emotion-focused coping had the highest level (P=0.02) of DRSCA (median 44 points), followed by patients with social support-focused coping (median 40 points) and problem-focused coping (median 36 points), while patients with avoidance-focused coping had the lowest SDSCA total score (33 points). The type of dominant coping mechanism has a significant impact on the quality of the DRSCA measures implemented by the patient to manage their diabetes. Patients with emotion-focused and social support-focused coping styles tend to have significantly increased adherence to DRSCA scores, while patients with other dominant coping styles are less interested in managing their disease. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5522817/ /pubmed/28761336 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S140146 Text en © 2017 Albai et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Albai, Alin
Sima, Alexandra
Papava, Ion
Roman, Deiana
Andor, Bogdan
Gafencu, Mihai
Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title_full Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title_short Association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
title_sort association between coping mechanisms and adherence to diabetes-related self-care activities: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761336
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S140146
work_keys_str_mv AT albaialin associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT simaalexandra associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT papavaion associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT romandeiana associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT andorbogdan associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT gafencumihai associationbetweencopingmechanismsandadherencetodiabetesrelatedselfcareactivitiesacrosssectionalstudy