Cargando…

Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India

OBJECTIVE: We aimed at evaluating the ability of individuals without ophthalmologic training to quickly capture high-quality images of the cornea by using a smartphone and low-cost anterior segment imaging adapter (the “EyeGo” prototype). METHODS: Seven volunteers photographed 1,502 anterior segment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludwig, Cassie A, Newsom, Megan R, Jais, Alexandre, Myung, David J, Murthy, Somasheila I, Chang, Robert T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134656
_version_ 1783252223140036608
author Ludwig, Cassie A
Newsom, Megan R
Jais, Alexandre
Myung, David J
Murthy, Somasheila I
Chang, Robert T
author_facet Ludwig, Cassie A
Newsom, Megan R
Jais, Alexandre
Myung, David J
Murthy, Somasheila I
Chang, Robert T
author_sort Ludwig, Cassie A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed at evaluating the ability of individuals without ophthalmologic training to quickly capture high-quality images of the cornea by using a smartphone and low-cost anterior segment imaging adapter (the “EyeGo” prototype). METHODS: Seven volunteers photographed 1,502 anterior segments from 751 high school students in Varni, India, by using an iPhone 5S with an attached EyeGo adapter. Primary outcome measures were median photograph quality of the cornea and anterior segment of the eye (validated Fundus Photography vs Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department [FOTO-ED] study; 1–5 scale; 5, best) and the time required to take each photograph. Volunteers were surveyed on their familiarity with using a smartphone (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable) and comfort in assessing problems with the eye (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable). Binomial logistic regression was performed using image quality (low quality: <4; high quality: ≥4) as the dependent variable and age, comfort using a smartphone, and comfort in assessing problems with the eye as independent variables. RESULTS: Six of the seven volunteers captured high-quality (median ≥4/5) images with a median time of ≤25 seconds per eye for all the eyes screened. Four of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant reductions in time to acquire photographs (P1=0.01, P5=0.01, P6=0.01, and P7=0.01), and three of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant improvements in the quality of photographs between the first 100 and last 100 eyes screened (P1<0.001, P2<0.001, and P6<0.01). Self-reported comfort using a smartphone (odds ratio [OR] =1.25; 95% CI =1.13 to 1.39) and self-reported comfort diagnosing eye conditions (OR =1.17; 95% CI =1.07 to 1.29) were significantly associated with an ability to take a high-quality image (≥4/5). There was a nonsignificant association between younger age and ability to take a high-quality image. CONCLUSION: Individuals without ophthalmic training were able to quickly capture a high-quality magnified view of the anterior segment of the eye by using a smartphone with an attached imaging adapter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55228192017-07-31 Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India Ludwig, Cassie A Newsom, Megan R Jais, Alexandre Myung, David J Murthy, Somasheila I Chang, Robert T Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: We aimed at evaluating the ability of individuals without ophthalmologic training to quickly capture high-quality images of the cornea by using a smartphone and low-cost anterior segment imaging adapter (the “EyeGo” prototype). METHODS: Seven volunteers photographed 1,502 anterior segments from 751 high school students in Varni, India, by using an iPhone 5S with an attached EyeGo adapter. Primary outcome measures were median photograph quality of the cornea and anterior segment of the eye (validated Fundus Photography vs Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department [FOTO-ED] study; 1–5 scale; 5, best) and the time required to take each photograph. Volunteers were surveyed on their familiarity with using a smartphone (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable) and comfort in assessing problems with the eye (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable). Binomial logistic regression was performed using image quality (low quality: <4; high quality: ≥4) as the dependent variable and age, comfort using a smartphone, and comfort in assessing problems with the eye as independent variables. RESULTS: Six of the seven volunteers captured high-quality (median ≥4/5) images with a median time of ≤25 seconds per eye for all the eyes screened. Four of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant reductions in time to acquire photographs (P1=0.01, P5=0.01, P6=0.01, and P7=0.01), and three of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant improvements in the quality of photographs between the first 100 and last 100 eyes screened (P1<0.001, P2<0.001, and P6<0.01). Self-reported comfort using a smartphone (odds ratio [OR] =1.25; 95% CI =1.13 to 1.39) and self-reported comfort diagnosing eye conditions (OR =1.17; 95% CI =1.07 to 1.29) were significantly associated with an ability to take a high-quality image (≥4/5). There was a nonsignificant association between younger age and ability to take a high-quality image. CONCLUSION: Individuals without ophthalmic training were able to quickly capture a high-quality magnified view of the anterior segment of the eye by using a smartphone with an attached imaging adapter. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5522819/ /pubmed/28761328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134656 Text en © 2017 Ludwig et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ludwig, Cassie A
Newsom, Megan R
Jais, Alexandre
Myung, David J
Murthy, Somasheila I
Chang, Robert T
Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title_full Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title_fullStr Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title_full_unstemmed Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title_short Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India
title_sort training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural india
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134656
work_keys_str_mv AT ludwigcassiea trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia
AT newsommeganr trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia
AT jaisalexandre trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia
AT myungdavidj trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia
AT murthysomasheilai trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia
AT changrobertt trainingtimeandqualityofsmartphonebasedanteriorsegmentscreeninginruralindia