Cargando…

Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore

PURPOSE: There are limited data on blood pressure variability (BPV) in Singapore. The absence of updated local guidelines might contribute to variations in diagnosis, treatment and control of hypertension and BPV between physicians. This study evaluated BPV awareness, hypertension management and ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setia, Sajita, Subramaniam, Kannan, Tay, Jam Chin, Teo, Boon Wee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S138694
_version_ 1783252223623430144
author Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Tay, Jam Chin
Teo, Boon Wee
author_facet Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Tay, Jam Chin
Teo, Boon Wee
author_sort Setia, Sajita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There are limited data on blood pressure variability (BPV) in Singapore. The absence of updated local guidelines might contribute to variations in diagnosis, treatment and control of hypertension and BPV between physicians. This study evaluated BPV awareness, hypertension management and associated training needs in physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from Singapore were surveyed between September 8, 2016, and October 5, 2016. Those included were in public or private practice for ≥3 years, cared directly for patients ≥70% of the time and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension each month. The questionnaire covered 6 main categories: general blood pressure (BP) management, BPV awareness/diagnosis, home BP monitoring (HBPM), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), BPV management and associated training needs. RESULTS: Responses from 60 physicians (30 general practitioners [GPs], 20 cardiologists, 10 nephrologists) were analyzed (77% male, 85% aged 31–60 years, mean 22 years of practice). Approximately 63% of physicians considered white-coat hypertension as part of BPV. The most common diagnostic tool was HBPM (overall 77%, GPs 63%, cardiologists 65%, nephrologists 70%), but ABPM was rated as the tool most valued by physicians (80% overall), especially specialists (97%). Withdrawn Singapore guidelines were still being used by 73% of GPs. Approximately 48% of physicians surveyed did not adhere to the BP cutoff recommended by most guidelines for diagnosing hypertension using HBPM (>135/85 mmHg). Hypertension treatment practices also varied from available guideline recommendations, although physicians did tend to use a lower BP target for patients with diabetes or kidney disease. There were a number of challenges to estimating BPV, the most common of which was patient refusal of ABPM/HBPM. The majority of physicians (82%) had no training on BPV, but stated that this would be useful. CONCLUSION: There appear to be gaps in knowledge and guideline adherence relating to the assessment and management of BPV among physicians in Singapore.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55228212017-07-31 Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore Setia, Sajita Subramaniam, Kannan Tay, Jam Chin Teo, Boon Wee Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: There are limited data on blood pressure variability (BPV) in Singapore. The absence of updated local guidelines might contribute to variations in diagnosis, treatment and control of hypertension and BPV between physicians. This study evaluated BPV awareness, hypertension management and associated training needs in physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from Singapore were surveyed between September 8, 2016, and October 5, 2016. Those included were in public or private practice for ≥3 years, cared directly for patients ≥70% of the time and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension each month. The questionnaire covered 6 main categories: general blood pressure (BP) management, BPV awareness/diagnosis, home BP monitoring (HBPM), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), BPV management and associated training needs. RESULTS: Responses from 60 physicians (30 general practitioners [GPs], 20 cardiologists, 10 nephrologists) were analyzed (77% male, 85% aged 31–60 years, mean 22 years of practice). Approximately 63% of physicians considered white-coat hypertension as part of BPV. The most common diagnostic tool was HBPM (overall 77%, GPs 63%, cardiologists 65%, nephrologists 70%), but ABPM was rated as the tool most valued by physicians (80% overall), especially specialists (97%). Withdrawn Singapore guidelines were still being used by 73% of GPs. Approximately 48% of physicians surveyed did not adhere to the BP cutoff recommended by most guidelines for diagnosing hypertension using HBPM (>135/85 mmHg). Hypertension treatment practices also varied from available guideline recommendations, although physicians did tend to use a lower BP target for patients with diabetes or kidney disease. There were a number of challenges to estimating BPV, the most common of which was patient refusal of ABPM/HBPM. The majority of physicians (82%) had no training on BPV, but stated that this would be useful. CONCLUSION: There appear to be gaps in knowledge and guideline adherence relating to the assessment and management of BPV among physicians in Singapore. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5522821/ /pubmed/28761353 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S138694 Text en © 2017 Setia et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Tay, Jam Chin
Teo, Boon Wee
Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title_full Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title_fullStr Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title_short Hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in Singapore
title_sort hypertension and blood pressure variability management practices among physicians in singapore
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S138694
work_keys_str_mv AT setiasajita hypertensionandbloodpressurevariabilitymanagementpracticesamongphysiciansinsingapore
AT subramaniamkannan hypertensionandbloodpressurevariabilitymanagementpracticesamongphysiciansinsingapore
AT tayjamchin hypertensionandbloodpressurevariabilitymanagementpracticesamongphysiciansinsingapore
AT teoboonwee hypertensionandbloodpressurevariabilitymanagementpracticesamongphysiciansinsingapore