Cargando…

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have not been well evaluated in conjunction with lower extremity revascularization (LER). This study evaluated freedom from amputation in patients who underwent either an open (OPEN) or endovascular (ENDO) revascularization with and without...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kray, Jared E, Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y, Vogel, Todd R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761352
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S137698
_version_ 1783252223861456896
author Kray, Jared E
Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y
Vogel, Todd R
author_facet Kray, Jared E
Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y
Vogel, Todd R
author_sort Kray, Jared E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have not been well evaluated in conjunction with lower extremity revascularization (LER). This study evaluated freedom from amputation in patients who underwent either an open (OPEN) or endovascular (ENDO) revascularization with and without utilization of an ACEI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LER were identified from 2007–2008 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Demographics, comorbidities, and disease severity were obtained. Post-procedural use of an ACEI was confirmed using combining them with National Drug Codes and Part D Files. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-square analysis, Kaplan–Meier test, and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 22,954 patients who underwent LER: 8,128 (35.4%) patients with claudication, 3,056 (13.3%) with rest pain, and 11,770 (51.3%) with ulceration or gangrene. More patients underwent ENDO (14,353) than OPEN (8,601) revascularization and 38% of the cohort was taking an ACEI. Overall, ACEI utilization compared to patients not taking ACEI was not associated with lower amputation rates at 30 days (13.5% vs. 12.6%), 90 days (17.7% vs. 17.1%), or 1 year (23.9% vs. 22.8%) (P>0.05 for all). After adjustment for comorbidities, ACEI utilization was associated with higher amputation rates for patients with rest pain (hazard ratio: 1.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.1–1.8). CONCLUSION: ACEI utilization was not associated with overall improved rates of amputation-free survival or overall survival in the vascular surgery population. However, an important finding of this study was that patients presenting with a diagnosis of rest pain and taking an ACEI who underwent a LER had statistically higher amputation rates and a lower amputation-free survival at 1 year. Further analysis is needed to delineate best medical management for patients with critical limb ischemia and taking ACEI who undergo vascular revascularization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55228222017-07-31 Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization Kray, Jared E Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y Vogel, Todd R Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have not been well evaluated in conjunction with lower extremity revascularization (LER). This study evaluated freedom from amputation in patients who underwent either an open (OPEN) or endovascular (ENDO) revascularization with and without utilization of an ACEI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LER were identified from 2007–2008 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Demographics, comorbidities, and disease severity were obtained. Post-procedural use of an ACEI was confirmed using combining them with National Drug Codes and Part D Files. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-square analysis, Kaplan–Meier test, and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 22,954 patients who underwent LER: 8,128 (35.4%) patients with claudication, 3,056 (13.3%) with rest pain, and 11,770 (51.3%) with ulceration or gangrene. More patients underwent ENDO (14,353) than OPEN (8,601) revascularization and 38% of the cohort was taking an ACEI. Overall, ACEI utilization compared to patients not taking ACEI was not associated with lower amputation rates at 30 days (13.5% vs. 12.6%), 90 days (17.7% vs. 17.1%), or 1 year (23.9% vs. 22.8%) (P>0.05 for all). After adjustment for comorbidities, ACEI utilization was associated with higher amputation rates for patients with rest pain (hazard ratio: 1.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.1–1.8). CONCLUSION: ACEI utilization was not associated with overall improved rates of amputation-free survival or overall survival in the vascular surgery population. However, an important finding of this study was that patients presenting with a diagnosis of rest pain and taking an ACEI who underwent a LER had statistically higher amputation rates and a lower amputation-free survival at 1 year. Further analysis is needed to delineate best medical management for patients with critical limb ischemia and taking ACEI who undergo vascular revascularization. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5522822/ /pubmed/28761352 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S137698 Text en © 2017 Kray et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kray, Jared E
Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y
Vogel, Todd R
Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title_full Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title_fullStr Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title_short Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
title_sort use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and freedom from amputation after lower extremity revascularization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761352
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S137698
work_keys_str_mv AT krayjarede useofangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsandfreedomfromamputationafterlowerextremityrevascularization
AT dombrovskiyviktory useofangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsandfreedomfromamputationafterlowerextremityrevascularization
AT vogeltoddr useofangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsandfreedomfromamputationafterlowerextremityrevascularization