Cargando…

Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study that was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosny, Mohamed, Aboalazayem, Fayrouz, El Shiwy, Hoda, Salem, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761329
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S132578
_version_ 1783252224340656128
author Hosny, Mohamed
Aboalazayem, Fayrouz
El Shiwy, Hoda
Salem, Mohsen
author_facet Hosny, Mohamed
Aboalazayem, Fayrouz
El Shiwy, Hoda
Salem, Mohsen
author_sort Hosny, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study that was conducted on 30 eyes in the interval between February 2016 and September 2016. The age of the patients ranged between 19 and 40 years. The patients underwent SMILE surgery using the femto laser. IOP was measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively by both techniques, the GAT and the ORA. RESULTS: GAT recorded lower values than ORA values (IOPcc) preoperatively and postoperatively and the difference was statistically significant. Both GAT and ORA IOP measurements decreased after SMILE. There was no statistically significant correlation between the changes in the GAT and ORA readings and the postoperative corneal pachymetry or the lenticule thickness. Both corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor showed significant decline after the procedure, which correlated with the lenticule thickness. CONCLUSION: SMILE causes significant reduction in IOP measurement by ORA and GAT. Corneal biomechanics decreases following SMILE and this correlates with lenticule thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5522824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55228242017-07-31 Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction Hosny, Mohamed Aboalazayem, Fayrouz El Shiwy, Hoda Salem, Mohsen Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study that was conducted on 30 eyes in the interval between February 2016 and September 2016. The age of the patients ranged between 19 and 40 years. The patients underwent SMILE surgery using the femto laser. IOP was measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively by both techniques, the GAT and the ORA. RESULTS: GAT recorded lower values than ORA values (IOPcc) preoperatively and postoperatively and the difference was statistically significant. Both GAT and ORA IOP measurements decreased after SMILE. There was no statistically significant correlation between the changes in the GAT and ORA readings and the postoperative corneal pachymetry or the lenticule thickness. Both corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor showed significant decline after the procedure, which correlated with the lenticule thickness. CONCLUSION: SMILE causes significant reduction in IOP measurement by ORA and GAT. Corneal biomechanics decreases following SMILE and this correlates with lenticule thickness. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5522824/ /pubmed/28761329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S132578 Text en © 2017 Hosny et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hosny, Mohamed
Aboalazayem, Fayrouz
El Shiwy, Hoda
Salem, Mohsen
Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title_full Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title_fullStr Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title_short Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
title_sort comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761329
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S132578
work_keys_str_mv AT hosnymohamed comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyesandpostsmallincisionlenticuleextraction
AT aboalazayemfayrouz comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyesandpostsmallincisionlenticuleextraction
AT elshiwyhoda comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyesandpostsmallincisionlenticuleextraction
AT salemmohsen comparisonofdifferentintraocularpressuremeasurementtechniquesinnormaleyesandpostsmallincisionlenticuleextraction