Cargando…
Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369]
BACKGROUND: Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common injuries to the knee joint. Arthroscopic ACL replacement by autologous tendon grafts has established itself as a standard of care. Data from both experimental and observational studies suggest that surgical reconstruction does n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC552311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15723704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-1 |
_version_ | 1782122478796013568 |
---|---|
author | Stengel, Dirk Matthes, Gerrit Seifert, Julia Tober, Volker Mutze, Sven Rademacher, Grit Ekkernkamp, Axel Bauwens, Kai Wich, Michael Casper, Dirk |
author_facet | Stengel, Dirk Matthes, Gerrit Seifert, Julia Tober, Volker Mutze, Sven Rademacher, Grit Ekkernkamp, Axel Bauwens, Kai Wich, Michael Casper, Dirk |
author_sort | Stengel, Dirk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common injuries to the knee joint. Arthroscopic ACL replacement by autologous tendon grafts has established itself as a standard of care. Data from both experimental and observational studies suggest that surgical reconstruction does not fully restore knee stability. Persisting anterior laxity may lead to recurrent episodes of giving-way and cartilage damage. This might at least in part depend on the method of graft fixation in the bony tunnels. Whereas resorbable screws are easy to handle, pins may better preserve graft tension. The objective of this study is to determine whether pinning of ACL grafts reduces residual anterior laxity six months after surgery as compared to screw fixation. DESIGN/ METHODS: SPOT is a randomised, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial conducted at a single academic institution. Eligible patients are scheduled to arthroscopic ACL repair with triple-stranded hamstring grafts, conducted by a single, experienced surgeon. Intraoperatively, subjects willing to engage in this study will be randomised to transplant tethering with either resorbable screws or resorbable pins. No other changes apply to locally established treatment protocols. Patients and clinical investigators will remain blinded to the assigned fixation method until the six-month follow-up examination. The primary outcome is the side-to-side (repaired to healthy knee) difference in anterior translation as measured by the KT-1000 arthrometer at a defined load (89 N) six months after surgery. A sample size of 54 patients will yield a power of 80% to detect a difference of 1.0 mm ± standard deviation 1.2 mm at a two-sided alpha of 5% with a t-test for independent samples. Secondary outcomes (generic and disease-specific measures of quality of life, magnetic resonance imaging morphology of transplants and devices) will be handled in an exploratory fashion. CONCLUSION: SPOT aims at showing a reduction in anterior knee laxity after fixing ACL grafts by pins compared to screws. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-552311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5523112005-03-06 Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] Stengel, Dirk Matthes, Gerrit Seifert, Julia Tober, Volker Mutze, Sven Rademacher, Grit Ekkernkamp, Axel Bauwens, Kai Wich, Michael Casper, Dirk BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common injuries to the knee joint. Arthroscopic ACL replacement by autologous tendon grafts has established itself as a standard of care. Data from both experimental and observational studies suggest that surgical reconstruction does not fully restore knee stability. Persisting anterior laxity may lead to recurrent episodes of giving-way and cartilage damage. This might at least in part depend on the method of graft fixation in the bony tunnels. Whereas resorbable screws are easy to handle, pins may better preserve graft tension. The objective of this study is to determine whether pinning of ACL grafts reduces residual anterior laxity six months after surgery as compared to screw fixation. DESIGN/ METHODS: SPOT is a randomised, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial conducted at a single academic institution. Eligible patients are scheduled to arthroscopic ACL repair with triple-stranded hamstring grafts, conducted by a single, experienced surgeon. Intraoperatively, subjects willing to engage in this study will be randomised to transplant tethering with either resorbable screws or resorbable pins. No other changes apply to locally established treatment protocols. Patients and clinical investigators will remain blinded to the assigned fixation method until the six-month follow-up examination. The primary outcome is the side-to-side (repaired to healthy knee) difference in anterior translation as measured by the KT-1000 arthrometer at a defined load (89 N) six months after surgery. A sample size of 54 patients will yield a power of 80% to detect a difference of 1.0 mm ± standard deviation 1.2 mm at a two-sided alpha of 5% with a t-test for independent samples. Secondary outcomes (generic and disease-specific measures of quality of life, magnetic resonance imaging morphology of transplants and devices) will be handled in an exploratory fashion. CONCLUSION: SPOT aims at showing a reduction in anterior knee laxity after fixing ACL grafts by pins compared to screws. BioMed Central 2005-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC552311/ /pubmed/15723704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-1 Text en Copyright © 2005 Stengel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Stengel, Dirk Matthes, Gerrit Seifert, Julia Tober, Volker Mutze, Sven Rademacher, Grit Ekkernkamp, Axel Bauwens, Kai Wich, Michael Casper, Dirk Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title | Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title_full | Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title_fullStr | Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title_full_unstemmed | Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title_short | Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369] |
title_sort | resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (spot) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [isrctn17384369] |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC552311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15723704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-5-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stengeldirk resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT matthesgerrit resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT seifertjulia resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT tobervolker resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT mutzesven resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT rademachergrit resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT ekkernkampaxel resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT bauwenskai resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT wichmichael resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT casperdirk resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 AT resorbablescrewsversuspinsforoptimaltransplantfixationspotinanteriorcruciateligamentreplacementwithautologoushamstringgraftsrationaleanddesignofarandomizedcontrolledpatientandinvestigatorblindedtrialisrctn17384369 |