Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Yong Suk, Shin, Sang youn, Hwang, Changhyeok, Seo, Jeonghun, Choi, Jong Won, Park, Byung Kyu, Won, Sun Young, Lee, Chun Kyon, Lee, Yong Kang, Jeon, Han Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28769979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626
_version_ 1783252295200276480
author Cho, Yong Suk
Shin, Sang youn
Hwang, Changhyeok
Seo, Jeonghun
Choi, Jong Won
Park, Byung Kyu
Won, Sun Young
Lee, Chun Kyon
Lee, Yong Kang
Jeon, Han Ho
author_facet Cho, Yong Suk
Shin, Sang youn
Hwang, Changhyeok
Seo, Jeonghun
Choi, Jong Won
Park, Byung Kyu
Won, Sun Young
Lee, Chun Kyon
Lee, Yong Kang
Jeon, Han Ho
author_sort Cho, Yong Suk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EDNAS for ESD. METHODS: Patients treated with ESD for gastric tumors between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a midazolam-treated group (M group) and a midazolam plus propofol-treated group (MP group). Clinical outcome, safety, effectiveness, adverse events of ESD, and adverse events of sedation were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 209 collected patients, 83 were in the M group and 126 were in the MP group. Of all patients, 67 patients had the circulatory adverse event during the ESD procedure. Sedation method was the only significant risk factor (M versus MP: 2.17 (1.14–4.15), p = 0.019). In analysis of MP subgroups, 47 patients suffered an adverse event from sedation, and current smoking was the only significant association factor for adverse event (0.15 (0.03–0.68), p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In performing ESD, the effect of sedation is reduced in smoking patients. EDNAS may be acceptable for ESD under careful monitoring of vital sign and oxygen saturation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5523312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55233122017-08-02 Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Cho, Yong Suk Shin, Sang youn Hwang, Changhyeok Seo, Jeonghun Choi, Jong Won Park, Byung Kyu Won, Sun Young Lee, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Kang Jeon, Han Ho Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EDNAS for ESD. METHODS: Patients treated with ESD for gastric tumors between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a midazolam-treated group (M group) and a midazolam plus propofol-treated group (MP group). Clinical outcome, safety, effectiveness, adverse events of ESD, and adverse events of sedation were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 209 collected patients, 83 were in the M group and 126 were in the MP group. Of all patients, 67 patients had the circulatory adverse event during the ESD procedure. Sedation method was the only significant risk factor (M versus MP: 2.17 (1.14–4.15), p = 0.019). In analysis of MP subgroups, 47 patients suffered an adverse event from sedation, and current smoking was the only significant association factor for adverse event (0.15 (0.03–0.68), p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In performing ESD, the effect of sedation is reduced in smoking patients. EDNAS may be acceptable for ESD under careful monitoring of vital sign and oxygen saturation. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5523312/ /pubmed/28769979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yong Suk Cho et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Cho, Yong Suk
Shin, Sang youn
Hwang, Changhyeok
Seo, Jeonghun
Choi, Jong Won
Park, Byung Kyu
Won, Sun Young
Lee, Chun Kyon
Lee, Yong Kang
Jeon, Han Ho
Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
title_sort safety and effectiveness of endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28769979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626
work_keys_str_mv AT choyongsuk safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT shinsangyoun safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT hwangchanghyeok safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT seojeonghun safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT choijongwon safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT parkbyungkyu safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT wonsunyoung safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT leechunkyon safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT leeyongkang safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT jeonhanho safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection