Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28769979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626 |
_version_ | 1783252295200276480 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Yong Suk Shin, Sang youn Hwang, Changhyeok Seo, Jeonghun Choi, Jong Won Park, Byung Kyu Won, Sun Young Lee, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Kang Jeon, Han Ho |
author_facet | Cho, Yong Suk Shin, Sang youn Hwang, Changhyeok Seo, Jeonghun Choi, Jong Won Park, Byung Kyu Won, Sun Young Lee, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Kang Jeon, Han Ho |
author_sort | Cho, Yong Suk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EDNAS for ESD. METHODS: Patients treated with ESD for gastric tumors between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a midazolam-treated group (M group) and a midazolam plus propofol-treated group (MP group). Clinical outcome, safety, effectiveness, adverse events of ESD, and adverse events of sedation were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 209 collected patients, 83 were in the M group and 126 were in the MP group. Of all patients, 67 patients had the circulatory adverse event during the ESD procedure. Sedation method was the only significant risk factor (M versus MP: 2.17 (1.14–4.15), p = 0.019). In analysis of MP subgroups, 47 patients suffered an adverse event from sedation, and current smoking was the only significant association factor for adverse event (0.15 (0.03–0.68), p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In performing ESD, the effect of sedation is reduced in smoking patients. EDNAS may be acceptable for ESD under careful monitoring of vital sign and oxygen saturation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5523312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55233122017-08-02 Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Cho, Yong Suk Shin, Sang youn Hwang, Changhyeok Seo, Jeonghun Choi, Jong Won Park, Byung Kyu Won, Sun Young Lee, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Kang Jeon, Han Ho Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EDNAS for ESD. METHODS: Patients treated with ESD for gastric tumors between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a midazolam-treated group (M group) and a midazolam plus propofol-treated group (MP group). Clinical outcome, safety, effectiveness, adverse events of ESD, and adverse events of sedation were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 209 collected patients, 83 were in the M group and 126 were in the MP group. Of all patients, 67 patients had the circulatory adverse event during the ESD procedure. Sedation method was the only significant risk factor (M versus MP: 2.17 (1.14–4.15), p = 0.019). In analysis of MP subgroups, 47 patients suffered an adverse event from sedation, and current smoking was the only significant association factor for adverse event (0.15 (0.03–0.68), p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In performing ESD, the effect of sedation is reduced in smoking patients. EDNAS may be acceptable for ESD under careful monitoring of vital sign and oxygen saturation. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5523312/ /pubmed/28769979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yong Suk Cho et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Cho, Yong Suk Shin, Sang youn Hwang, Changhyeok Seo, Jeonghun Choi, Jong Won Park, Byung Kyu Won, Sun Young Lee, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Kang Jeon, Han Ho Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28769979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4723626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choyongsuk safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT shinsangyoun safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT hwangchanghyeok safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT seojeonghun safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT choijongwon safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT parkbyungkyu safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT wonsunyoung safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT leechunkyon safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT leeyongkang safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT jeonhanho safetyandeffectivenessofendoscopistdirectednurseadministeredsedationduringgastricendoscopicsubmucosaldissection |