Cargando…

Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study

BACKGROUND: Optimal timing of implantation of an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) after newly diagnosed heart failure is unclear given that late reverse remodelling may occur. We aimed to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after diagnosis of an LVEF ≤35% during optimizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncker, David, König, Thorben, Hohmann, Stephan, Bauersachs, Johann, Veltmann, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004512
_version_ 1783252353577648128
author Duncker, David
König, Thorben
Hohmann, Stephan
Bauersachs, Johann
Veltmann, Christian
author_facet Duncker, David
König, Thorben
Hohmann, Stephan
Bauersachs, Johann
Veltmann, Christian
author_sort Duncker, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal timing of implantation of an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) after newly diagnosed heart failure is unclear given that late reverse remodelling may occur. We aimed to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after diagnosis of an LVEF ≤35% during optimization of heart failure drug therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty‐six patients with newly diagnosed LVEF ≤35% receiving a wearable cardioverter/defibrillator (WCD) were analyzed. WCD was prescribed for 3 months until first re‐evaluation. Indications for prolongation of WCD wearing period instead of ICD implantation were: (1) LVEF at 3‐month visit 30% to 35%; (2) increase in LVEF of ≥5% compared to the last visit; and (3) nonoptimized heart failure medication. Mean LVEF was 24±7% at diagnosis and 39±11% at last follow‐up (mean, 12±10 months). Whereas 88 patients presented a primary preventive ICD indication (LVEF ≤35%) at 3‐month follow‐up, only 58 showed a persistent primary preventive ICD indication at last follow‐up. This delayed improvement in LVEF was related to nonischemic origin of cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class at baseline, heart rate, better LVEF after 3 months, and higher dosages of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Twelve appropriate WCD shocks for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 patients. Two patients suffered from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation beyond 3 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A relevant proportion of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure shows recovery of LVEF >35% beyond 3 months after initiation of heart failure therapy. To avoid untimely ICD implantation, prolongation of WCD period should be considered in these patients to prevent sudden cardiac death while allowing left ventricular reverse remodeling during intensified drug therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5523634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55236342017-08-02 Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study Duncker, David König, Thorben Hohmann, Stephan Bauersachs, Johann Veltmann, Christian J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Optimal timing of implantation of an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) after newly diagnosed heart failure is unclear given that late reverse remodelling may occur. We aimed to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after diagnosis of an LVEF ≤35% during optimization of heart failure drug therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty‐six patients with newly diagnosed LVEF ≤35% receiving a wearable cardioverter/defibrillator (WCD) were analyzed. WCD was prescribed for 3 months until first re‐evaluation. Indications for prolongation of WCD wearing period instead of ICD implantation were: (1) LVEF at 3‐month visit 30% to 35%; (2) increase in LVEF of ≥5% compared to the last visit; and (3) nonoptimized heart failure medication. Mean LVEF was 24±7% at diagnosis and 39±11% at last follow‐up (mean, 12±10 months). Whereas 88 patients presented a primary preventive ICD indication (LVEF ≤35%) at 3‐month follow‐up, only 58 showed a persistent primary preventive ICD indication at last follow‐up. This delayed improvement in LVEF was related to nonischemic origin of cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class at baseline, heart rate, better LVEF after 3 months, and higher dosages of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Twelve appropriate WCD shocks for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 patients. Two patients suffered from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation beyond 3 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A relevant proportion of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure shows recovery of LVEF >35% beyond 3 months after initiation of heart failure therapy. To avoid untimely ICD implantation, prolongation of WCD period should be considered in these patients to prevent sudden cardiac death while allowing left ventricular reverse remodeling during intensified drug therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5523634/ /pubmed/28096098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004512 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Duncker, David
König, Thorben
Hohmann, Stephan
Bauersachs, Johann
Veltmann, Christian
Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title_full Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title_fullStr Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title_short Avoiding Untimely Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Implantation by Intensified Heart Failure Therapy Optimization Supported by the Wearable Cardioverter/Defibrillator—The PROLONG Study
title_sort avoiding untimely implantable cardioverter/defibrillator implantation by intensified heart failure therapy optimization supported by the wearable cardioverter/defibrillator—the prolong study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004512
work_keys_str_mv AT dunckerdavid avoidinguntimelyimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationbyintensifiedheartfailuretherapyoptimizationsupportedbythewearablecardioverterdefibrillatortheprolongstudy
AT konigthorben avoidinguntimelyimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationbyintensifiedheartfailuretherapyoptimizationsupportedbythewearablecardioverterdefibrillatortheprolongstudy
AT hohmannstephan avoidinguntimelyimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationbyintensifiedheartfailuretherapyoptimizationsupportedbythewearablecardioverterdefibrillatortheprolongstudy
AT bauersachsjohann avoidinguntimelyimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationbyintensifiedheartfailuretherapyoptimizationsupportedbythewearablecardioverterdefibrillatortheprolongstudy
AT veltmannchristian avoidinguntimelyimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorimplantationbyintensifiedheartfailuretherapyoptimizationsupportedbythewearablecardioverterdefibrillatortheprolongstudy