Cargando…

Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model

OBJECTIVE: Providing effective dietary counselling so that pregnancy weight gain remains within the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines requires accurate maternal energy intake measures. Current practice is based on self‐reported intake that has been demonstrated unreliable. This study appli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, D. M., Bredlau, C., Islam, S., Armah, K. A., Kunnipparampil, J., Patel, K., Redman, L. M., Misra, D., Salafia, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.29
_version_ 1783252359093157888
author Thomas, D. M.
Bredlau, C.
Islam, S.
Armah, K. A.
Kunnipparampil, J.
Patel, K.
Redman, L. M.
Misra, D.
Salafia, C.
author_facet Thomas, D. M.
Bredlau, C.
Islam, S.
Armah, K. A.
Kunnipparampil, J.
Patel, K.
Redman, L. M.
Misra, D.
Salafia, C.
author_sort Thomas, D. M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Providing effective dietary counselling so that pregnancy weight gain remains within the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines requires accurate maternal energy intake measures. Current practice is based on self‐reported intake that has been demonstrated unreliable. This study applies an objective calculation of energy intake from a validated mathematical model to identify characteristics of individuals more likely to misreport during pregnancy. METHODS: A validated maternal energy balance equation was used to calculate energy intake from gestational weight gain in 1,368 subjects. The difference between self‐reported and model‐predicted energy intake was tested for demographics, economic status, education level and maternal health status. RESULTS: A weight gain of 15.2 kg resulted in model‐predicted intake during pregnancy of 2,882.97 ±  135.71 kcal day(−1), which differed from self‐reported intake of 2,180.5 ± 856.0 kcal day(−1). The achieved weight gain exceeded the IOM guidelines; however, the model predicted weight gain from self‐reported energy intake was below IOM guidelines. Higher income (p = 0.004), education (p = 0.003), birth weight (p = 0.017), gestational diabetes (p = 0.008) and pre‐existing diabetes (p < 0.001) were associated with under‐reported energy intake. More children living at home (p = 0.001) were associated with more accurate self‐reported intake. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing self‐reported energy intake in pregnancy studies, birth weight, gestational diabetes status, pre‐existing diabetes, higher income and education predict higher under‐reporting. Clinicians providing dietary treatment recommendations during pregnancy should be aware that individuals with pre‐existing diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus are more likely to misreport their intake. Additionally, the systems model approach can be applied early in intervention to objectively monitor dietary compliance to treatment recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5523690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55236902017-10-25 Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model Thomas, D. M. Bredlau, C. Islam, S. Armah, K. A. Kunnipparampil, J. Patel, K. Redman, L. M. Misra, D. Salafia, C. Obes Sci Pract Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Providing effective dietary counselling so that pregnancy weight gain remains within the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines requires accurate maternal energy intake measures. Current practice is based on self‐reported intake that has been demonstrated unreliable. This study applies an objective calculation of energy intake from a validated mathematical model to identify characteristics of individuals more likely to misreport during pregnancy. METHODS: A validated maternal energy balance equation was used to calculate energy intake from gestational weight gain in 1,368 subjects. The difference between self‐reported and model‐predicted energy intake was tested for demographics, economic status, education level and maternal health status. RESULTS: A weight gain of 15.2 kg resulted in model‐predicted intake during pregnancy of 2,882.97 ±  135.71 kcal day(−1), which differed from self‐reported intake of 2,180.5 ± 856.0 kcal day(−1). The achieved weight gain exceeded the IOM guidelines; however, the model predicted weight gain from self‐reported energy intake was below IOM guidelines. Higher income (p = 0.004), education (p = 0.003), birth weight (p = 0.017), gestational diabetes (p = 0.008) and pre‐existing diabetes (p < 0.001) were associated with under‐reported energy intake. More children living at home (p = 0.001) were associated with more accurate self‐reported intake. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing self‐reported energy intake in pregnancy studies, birth weight, gestational diabetes status, pre‐existing diabetes, higher income and education predict higher under‐reporting. Clinicians providing dietary treatment recommendations during pregnancy should be aware that individuals with pre‐existing diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus are more likely to misreport their intake. Additionally, the systems model approach can be applied early in intervention to objectively monitor dietary compliance to treatment recommendations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5523690/ /pubmed/29071098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.29 Text en © 2016 The Authors Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Thomas, D. M.
Bredlau, C.
Islam, S.
Armah, K. A.
Kunnipparampil, J.
Patel, K.
Redman, L. M.
Misra, D.
Salafia, C.
Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title_full Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title_fullStr Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title_short Relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
title_sort relationships between misreported energy intake and pregnancy in the pregnancy, infection and nutrition study: new insights from a dynamic energy balance model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.29
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasdm relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT bredlauc relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT islams relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT armahka relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT kunnipparampilj relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT patelk relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT redmanlm relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT misrad relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel
AT salafiac relationshipsbetweenmisreportedenergyintakeandpregnancyinthepregnancyinfectionandnutritionstudynewinsightsfromadynamicenergybalancemodel