Cargando…

Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Challenges and uncertainties with test result interpretation can lead to diagnostic errors. Primary care doctors are at a higher risk than specialists of making these errors, due to the range in complexity and severity of conditions that they encounter. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanker, Naadira, Faull, Norman H. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.453
_version_ 1783252390536806400
author Vanker, Naadira
Faull, Norman H. B.
author_facet Vanker, Naadira
Faull, Norman H. B.
author_sort Vanker, Naadira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Challenges and uncertainties with test result interpretation can lead to diagnostic errors. Primary care doctors are at a higher risk than specialists of making these errors, due to the range in complexity and severity of conditions that they encounter. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the challenges that primary care doctors face with test result interpretation, and to identify potential countermeasures to address these. METHODS: A survey was sent out to 7800 primary care doctors in South Africa. Questionnaire themes included doctors’ uncertainty with interpreting test results, mechanisms used to overcome this uncertainty, challenges with appropriate result interpretation, and perceived solutions for interpreting results. RESULTS: Of the 552 responses received, the prevalence of challenges with result interpretation was estimated in an average of 17% of diagnostic encounters. The most commonly-reported challenges were not receiving test results in a timely manner (51% of respondents) and previous results not being easily available (37%). When faced with diagnostic uncertainty, 84% of respondents would either follow-up and reassess the patient or discuss the case with a specialist, and 67% would contact a laboratory professional. The most useful test utilisation enablers were found to be: interpretive comments (78% of respondents), published guidelines (74%), and a dedicated laboratory phone line (72%). CONCLUSION: Primary care doctors acknowledge uncertainty with test result interpretation. Potential countermeasures include the addition of patient-specific interpretive comments, the availability of guidelines or algorithms, and a dedicated laboratory phone line. The benefit of enhanced test result interpretation would reduce diagnostic error rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5523924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55239242017-09-06 Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa Vanker, Naadira Faull, Norman H. B. Afr J Lab Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Challenges and uncertainties with test result interpretation can lead to diagnostic errors. Primary care doctors are at a higher risk than specialists of making these errors, due to the range in complexity and severity of conditions that they encounter. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the challenges that primary care doctors face with test result interpretation, and to identify potential countermeasures to address these. METHODS: A survey was sent out to 7800 primary care doctors in South Africa. Questionnaire themes included doctors’ uncertainty with interpreting test results, mechanisms used to overcome this uncertainty, challenges with appropriate result interpretation, and perceived solutions for interpreting results. RESULTS: Of the 552 responses received, the prevalence of challenges with result interpretation was estimated in an average of 17% of diagnostic encounters. The most commonly-reported challenges were not receiving test results in a timely manner (51% of respondents) and previous results not being easily available (37%). When faced with diagnostic uncertainty, 84% of respondents would either follow-up and reassess the patient or discuss the case with a specialist, and 67% would contact a laboratory professional. The most useful test utilisation enablers were found to be: interpretive comments (78% of respondents), published guidelines (74%), and a dedicated laboratory phone line (72%). CONCLUSION: Primary care doctors acknowledge uncertainty with test result interpretation. Potential countermeasures include the addition of patient-specific interpretive comments, the availability of guidelines or algorithms, and a dedicated laboratory phone line. The benefit of enhanced test result interpretation would reduce diagnostic error rates. AOSIS 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5523924/ /pubmed/28879147 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.453 Text en © 2017. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vanker, Naadira
Faull, Norman H. B.
Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title_full Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title_fullStr Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title_short Laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in South Africa
title_sort laboratory test result interpretation for primary care doctors in south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.453
work_keys_str_mv AT vankernaadira laboratorytestresultinterpretationforprimarycaredoctorsinsouthafrica
AT faullnormanhb laboratorytestresultinterpretationforprimarycaredoctorsinsouthafrica