Cargando…
Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the emergency department (ED) is made solely by ECG. Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003528 |
_version_ | 1783252394920902656 |
---|---|
author | Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. Baugh, Christopher W. McWade, Conor M. Liu, Xulei Song, Kyoung Jun Patterson, Brian W. Jenkins, Cathy A. Tanski, Mary Mills, Angela M. Salazar, Gilberto Wang, Thomas J. Dittus, Robert S. Liu, Dandan Storrow, Alan B. |
author_facet | Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. Baugh, Christopher W. McWade, Conor M. Liu, Xulei Song, Kyoung Jun Patterson, Brian W. Jenkins, Cathy A. Tanski, Mary Mills, Angela M. Salazar, Gilberto Wang, Thomas J. Dittus, Robert S. Liu, Dandan Storrow, Alan B. |
author_sort | Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the emergency department (ED) is made solely by ECG. Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI across institutions and whether performance variation was associated with the ED characteristics, the comprehensiveness of screening criteria, and the STEMI screening processes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined STEMI screening performance in 7 EDs, with the missed case rate (MCR) as our primary end point. The MCR is the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival. STEMI was defined by hospital discharge diagnosis. Relationships between the MCR and ED characteristics, screening criteria, and STEMI screening processes were assessed, along with differences in door‐to‐ECG times for captured versus missed patients. The overall MCR for all 7 EDs was 12.8%. The lowest and highest MCRs were 3.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The mean difference in door‐to‐ECG times for captured and missed patients was 31 minutes, with a range of 14 to 80 minutes of additional myocardial ischemia time for missed cases. The prevalence of primarily screened ED STEMIs was 0.09%. EDs with the greatest informedness (sensitivity+specificity−1) demonstrated superior performance across all other screening measures. CONCLUSIONS: The 29.2% difference in MCRs between the highest and lowest performing EDs demonstrates room for improving timely STEMI identification among primarily screened ED patients. The MCR and informedness can be used to compare screening across EDs and to understand variable performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5523988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55239882017-08-15 Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. Baugh, Christopher W. McWade, Conor M. Liu, Xulei Song, Kyoung Jun Patterson, Brian W. Jenkins, Cathy A. Tanski, Mary Mills, Angela M. Salazar, Gilberto Wang, Thomas J. Dittus, Robert S. Liu, Dandan Storrow, Alan B. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the emergency department (ED) is made solely by ECG. Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI across institutions and whether performance variation was associated with the ED characteristics, the comprehensiveness of screening criteria, and the STEMI screening processes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined STEMI screening performance in 7 EDs, with the missed case rate (MCR) as our primary end point. The MCR is the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival. STEMI was defined by hospital discharge diagnosis. Relationships between the MCR and ED characteristics, screening criteria, and STEMI screening processes were assessed, along with differences in door‐to‐ECG times for captured versus missed patients. The overall MCR for all 7 EDs was 12.8%. The lowest and highest MCRs were 3.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The mean difference in door‐to‐ECG times for captured and missed patients was 31 minutes, with a range of 14 to 80 minutes of additional myocardial ischemia time for missed cases. The prevalence of primarily screened ED STEMIs was 0.09%. EDs with the greatest informedness (sensitivity+specificity−1) demonstrated superior performance across all other screening measures. CONCLUSIONS: The 29.2% difference in MCRs between the highest and lowest performing EDs demonstrates room for improving timely STEMI identification among primarily screened ED patients. The MCR and informedness can be used to compare screening across EDs and to understand variable performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5523988/ /pubmed/28232323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003528 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yiadom, Maame Yaa A. B. Baugh, Christopher W. McWade, Conor M. Liu, Xulei Song, Kyoung Jun Patterson, Brian W. Jenkins, Cathy A. Tanski, Mary Mills, Angela M. Salazar, Gilberto Wang, Thomas J. Dittus, Robert S. Liu, Dandan Storrow, Alan B. Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title | Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | performance of emergency department screening criteria for an early ecg to identify st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiadommaameyaaab performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT baughchristopherw performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mcwadeconorm performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT liuxulei performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT songkyoungjun performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT pattersonbrianw performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT jenkinscathya performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT tanskimary performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT millsangelam performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT salazargilberto performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wangthomasj performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT dittusroberts performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT liudandan performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT storrowalanb performanceofemergencydepartmentscreeningcriteriaforanearlyecgtoidentifystsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction |