Cargando…

Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort

BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibril...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varma, Niraj, Mittal, Suneet, Prillinger, Julie B., Snell, Jeff, Dalal, Nirav, Piccini, Jonathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031
_version_ 1783252414107746304
author Varma, Niraj
Mittal, Suneet
Prillinger, Julie B.
Snell, Jeff
Dalal, Nirav
Piccini, Jonathan P.
author_facet Varma, Niraj
Mittal, Suneet
Prillinger, Julie B.
Snell, Jeff
Dalal, Nirav
Piccini, Jonathan P.
author_sort Varma, Niraj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and CRT devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and ZIP‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates (MR; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving PMs (n=115 076, 55% male; MR 4193 versus MR 4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84–0.90; P<0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male; MR 4417 versus MR 4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–1.02; P=0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving CRT defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male; MR 5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76; P<0.001) and also CRT pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male; MR 5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61–0.78; P<0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and PMs was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5524072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55240722017-08-02 Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort Varma, Niraj Mittal, Suneet Prillinger, Julie B. Snell, Jeff Dalal, Nirav Piccini, Jonathan P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and CRT devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and ZIP‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates (MR; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving PMs (n=115 076, 55% male; MR 4193 versus MR 4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84–0.90; P<0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male; MR 4417 versus MR 4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–1.02; P=0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving CRT defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male; MR 5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76; P<0.001) and also CRT pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male; MR 5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61–0.78; P<0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and PMs was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based CRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5524072/ /pubmed/28490521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031 Text en © 2017 The Authors and St. Jude Medical. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Varma, Niraj
Mittal, Suneet
Prillinger, Julie B.
Snell, Jeff
Dalal, Nirav
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title_full Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title_fullStr Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title_short Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
title_sort survival in women versus men following implantation of pacemakers, defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in a large, nationwide cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031
work_keys_str_mv AT varmaniraj survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort
AT mittalsuneet survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort
AT prillingerjulieb survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort
AT snelljeff survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort
AT dalalnirav survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort
AT piccinijonathanp survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort