Cargando…
Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort
BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibril...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031 |
_version_ | 1783252414107746304 |
---|---|
author | Varma, Niraj Mittal, Suneet Prillinger, Julie B. Snell, Jeff Dalal, Nirav Piccini, Jonathan P. |
author_facet | Varma, Niraj Mittal, Suneet Prillinger, Julie B. Snell, Jeff Dalal, Nirav Piccini, Jonathan P. |
author_sort | Varma, Niraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and CRT devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and ZIP‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates (MR; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving PMs (n=115 076, 55% male; MR 4193 versus MR 4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84–0.90; P<0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male; MR 4417 versus MR 4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–1.02; P=0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving CRT defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male; MR 5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76; P<0.001) and also CRT pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male; MR 5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61–0.78; P<0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and PMs was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based CRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5524072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55240722017-08-02 Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort Varma, Niraj Mittal, Suneet Prillinger, Julie B. Snell, Jeff Dalal, Nirav Piccini, Jonathan P. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ between sexes following treatment with pacemakers (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive US patients with newly implanted PM, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and CRT devices from a large remote monitoring database between 2008 and 2011 were included in this observational cohort study. Sex‐specific all‐cause survival postimplant was compared within each device type using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, stratified on age and adjusted for remote monitoring utilization and ZIP‐based socioeconomic variables. A total of 269 471 patients were assessed over a median 2.9 [interquartile range, 2.2, 3.6] years. Unadjusted mortality rates (MR; deaths/100 000 patient‐years) were similar between women versus men receiving PMs (n=115 076, 55% male; MR 4193 versus MR 4256, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84–0.90; P<0.001) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (n=85 014, 74% male; MR 4417 versus MR 4479, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93–1.02; P=0.244). In contrast, survival was superior in women receiving CRT defibrillators (n=61 475, 72% male; MR 5270 versus male MR 7175; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76; P<0.001) and also CRT pacemakers (n=7906, 57% male; MR 5383 versus male MR 7625, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61–0.78; P<0.001). This relative difference increased with time. These results were unaffected by age or remote monitoring utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Women accounted for less than 30% of high‐voltage implants and fewer than half of low‐voltage implants in a large, nation‐wide cohort. Survival for women and men receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and PMs was similar, but dramatically greater for women receiving both defibrillator‐ and PM‐based CRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5524072/ /pubmed/28490521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031 Text en © 2017 The Authors and St. Jude Medical. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Varma, Niraj Mittal, Suneet Prillinger, Julie B. Snell, Jeff Dalal, Nirav Piccini, Jonathan P. Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title | Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title_full | Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title_fullStr | Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title_short | Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort |
title_sort | survival in women versus men following implantation of pacemakers, defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in a large, nationwide cohort |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varmaniraj survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort AT mittalsuneet survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort AT prillingerjulieb survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort AT snelljeff survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort AT dalalnirav survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort AT piccinijonathanp survivalinwomenversusmenfollowingimplantationofpacemakersdefibrillatorsandcardiacresynchronizationtherapydevicesinalargenationwidecohort |