Cargando…
Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique
Coalescence during emulsification has a significant effect on the outcome of the process, especially for the high volume fractions of disperse phase common in food and pharmaceutical processing. Controlling emulsification requires that the extent of coalescence during different conditions can be qua...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00359 |
_version_ | 1783252431707045888 |
---|---|
author | Håkansson, Andreas |
author_facet | Håkansson, Andreas |
author_sort | Håkansson, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coalescence during emulsification has a significant effect on the outcome of the process, especially for the high volume fractions of disperse phase common in food and pharmaceutical processing. Controlling emulsification requires that the extent of coalescence during different conditions can be quantified. The step-down technique is the most commonly used method for measuring coalescence frequency during emulsification. However, the validity of the method has been questioned. No in-depth theoretical validation or best practice guidelines have been provided for the step-down technique, or for any of the suggested alternative methods. This contribution derives error estimates for three non-idealities present in every step-down experiment: i) limited sampling rate, ii) non-instantaneous step-down and iii) residual fragmentation after the step. It is concluded that all three factors give rise to systematic errors in estimating coalescence rate. However, by carefully choosing experimental settings, the errors can be kept small. The method, thus, remains suitable for many conditions. Best practice guidelines for applying the method are given, both generally, and more specifically for stirred tank oil-in-water emulsification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5524228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55242282017-07-31 Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique Håkansson, Andreas Heliyon Article Coalescence during emulsification has a significant effect on the outcome of the process, especially for the high volume fractions of disperse phase common in food and pharmaceutical processing. Controlling emulsification requires that the extent of coalescence during different conditions can be quantified. The step-down technique is the most commonly used method for measuring coalescence frequency during emulsification. However, the validity of the method has been questioned. No in-depth theoretical validation or best practice guidelines have been provided for the step-down technique, or for any of the suggested alternative methods. This contribution derives error estimates for three non-idealities present in every step-down experiment: i) limited sampling rate, ii) non-instantaneous step-down and iii) residual fragmentation after the step. It is concluded that all three factors give rise to systematic errors in estimating coalescence rate. However, by carefully choosing experimental settings, the errors can be kept small. The method, thus, remains suitable for many conditions. Best practice guidelines for applying the method are given, both generally, and more specifically for stirred tank oil-in-water emulsification. Elsevier 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5524228/ /pubmed/28761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00359 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Håkansson, Andreas Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title | Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title_full | Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title_fullStr | Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title_short | Error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
title_sort | error estimation, validity and best practice guidelines for quantifying coalescence frequency during emulsification using the step-down technique |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hakanssonandreas errorestimationvalidityandbestpracticeguidelinesforquantifyingcoalescencefrequencyduringemulsificationusingthestepdowntechnique |