Cargando…

Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of rotator cuff repair continues to rise, with a noted transition from open to arthroscopic techniques in recent years. One reported advantage of arthroscopic repair is a lower infection rate. However, to date, the infection rates of these 2 techniques have not been direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Jonathan D., Hughes, Jessica L., Bartley, Justin H., Hamilton, William P., Brennan, Kindyle L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
12
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28795072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117715416
_version_ 1783252433580851200
author Hughes, Jonathan D.
Hughes, Jessica L.
Bartley, Justin H.
Hamilton, William P.
Brennan, Kindyle L.
author_facet Hughes, Jonathan D.
Hughes, Jessica L.
Bartley, Justin H.
Hamilton, William P.
Brennan, Kindyle L.
author_sort Hughes, Jonathan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of rotator cuff repair continues to rise, with a noted transition from open to arthroscopic techniques in recent years. One reported advantage of arthroscopic repair is a lower infection rate. However, to date, the infection rates of these 2 techniques have not been directly compared with large samples at a single institution with fully integrated medical records. PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare postoperative infection rates between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From January 2003 until May 2011, a total of 1556 patients underwent rotator cuff repair at a single institution. These patients were divided into an arthroscopic repair group and an open group. A Pearson chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used, with a subgroup analysis to segment the open repair group into mini-open and open procedures. The odds ratio and 95% CI of developing a postoperative infection was calculated for the 2 groups. A multiple-regressions model was then utilized to identify predictors of the presence of infection. Infection was defined as only those treated with surgical intervention, thus excluding superficial infections treated with antibiotics alone. RESULTS: A total of 903 patients had an arthroscopic repair, while 653 had open repairs (600 mini-open, 53 open). There were 4 confirmed infections in the arthroscopic group and 16 in the open group (15 mini-open, 1 open), resulting in postoperative infection rates of 0.44% and 2.45%, respectively. Subgroup analysis of the mini-open and open groups demonstrated a postoperative infection rate of 2.50% and 1.89%, respectively. The open group had an odds ratio of 5.645 (95% CI, 1.9-17.0) to develop a postoperative infection compared with the arthroscopic group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing open rotator cuff repair had a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection compared with those undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5524237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55242372017-08-09 Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair Hughes, Jonathan D. Hughes, Jessica L. Bartley, Justin H. Hamilton, William P. Brennan, Kindyle L. Orthop J Sports Med 12 BACKGROUND: The prevalence of rotator cuff repair continues to rise, with a noted transition from open to arthroscopic techniques in recent years. One reported advantage of arthroscopic repair is a lower infection rate. However, to date, the infection rates of these 2 techniques have not been directly compared with large samples at a single institution with fully integrated medical records. PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare postoperative infection rates between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From January 2003 until May 2011, a total of 1556 patients underwent rotator cuff repair at a single institution. These patients were divided into an arthroscopic repair group and an open group. A Pearson chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used, with a subgroup analysis to segment the open repair group into mini-open and open procedures. The odds ratio and 95% CI of developing a postoperative infection was calculated for the 2 groups. A multiple-regressions model was then utilized to identify predictors of the presence of infection. Infection was defined as only those treated with surgical intervention, thus excluding superficial infections treated with antibiotics alone. RESULTS: A total of 903 patients had an arthroscopic repair, while 653 had open repairs (600 mini-open, 53 open). There were 4 confirmed infections in the arthroscopic group and 16 in the open group (15 mini-open, 1 open), resulting in postoperative infection rates of 0.44% and 2.45%, respectively. Subgroup analysis of the mini-open and open groups demonstrated a postoperative infection rate of 2.50% and 1.89%, respectively. The open group had an odds ratio of 5.645 (95% CI, 1.9-17.0) to develop a postoperative infection compared with the arthroscopic group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing open rotator cuff repair had a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection compared with those undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. SAGE Publications 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5524237/ /pubmed/28795072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117715416 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 12
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Hughes, Jessica L.
Bartley, Justin H.
Hamilton, William P.
Brennan, Kindyle L.
Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title_full Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title_fullStr Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title_full_unstemmed Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title_short Infection Rates in Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
title_sort infection rates in arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair
topic 12
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28795072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117715416
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesjonathand infectionratesinarthroscopicversusopenrotatorcuffrepair
AT hughesjessical infectionratesinarthroscopicversusopenrotatorcuffrepair
AT bartleyjustinh infectionratesinarthroscopicversusopenrotatorcuffrepair
AT hamiltonwilliamp infectionratesinarthroscopicversusopenrotatorcuffrepair
AT brennankindylel infectionratesinarthroscopicversusopenrotatorcuffrepair