Cargando…
Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y |
_version_ | 1783252499069665280 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ling Su, Yongbin Wang, Qianqian Duanmu, Yangyang Yang, Minghui Yi, Chen Cheng, Xiaoguang |
author_facet | Wang, Ling Su, Yongbin Wang, Qianqian Duanmu, Yangyang Yang, Minghui Yi, Chen Cheng, Xiaoguang |
author_sort | Wang, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4–6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53–0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96–0.99. A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5524691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55246912017-07-26 Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography Wang, Ling Su, Yongbin Wang, Qianqian Duanmu, Yangyang Yang, Minghui Yi, Chen Cheng, Xiaoguang Sci Rep Article Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4–6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53–0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96–0.99. A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5524691/ /pubmed/28740145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Ling Su, Yongbin Wang, Qianqian Duanmu, Yangyang Yang, Minghui Yi, Chen Cheng, Xiaoguang Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title | Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title_full | Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title_short | Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
title_sort | validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangling validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT suyongbin validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT wangqianqian validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT duanmuyangyang validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT yangminghui validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT yichen validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography AT chengxiaoguang validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography |