Cargando…

Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography

Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ling, Su, Yongbin, Wang, Qianqian, Duanmu, Yangyang, Yang, Minghui, Yi, Chen, Cheng, Xiaoguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y
_version_ 1783252499069665280
author Wang, Ling
Su, Yongbin
Wang, Qianqian
Duanmu, Yangyang
Yang, Minghui
Yi, Chen
Cheng, Xiaoguang
author_facet Wang, Ling
Su, Yongbin
Wang, Qianqian
Duanmu, Yangyang
Yang, Minghui
Yi, Chen
Cheng, Xiaoguang
author_sort Wang, Ling
collection PubMed
description Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4–6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53–0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96–0.99. A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5524691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55246912017-07-26 Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography Wang, Ling Su, Yongbin Wang, Qianqian Duanmu, Yangyang Yang, Minghui Yi, Chen Cheng, Xiaoguang Sci Rep Article Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4–6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53–0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96–0.99. A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5524691/ /pubmed/28740145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Ling
Su, Yongbin
Wang, Qianqian
Duanmu, Yangyang
Yang, Minghui
Yi, Chen
Cheng, Xiaoguang
Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title_full Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title_fullStr Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title_short Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
title_sort validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangling validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT suyongbin validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT wangqianqian validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT duanmuyangyang validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT yangminghui validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT yichen validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography
AT chengxiaoguang validationofasynchronousquantitativebonedensitometryofthespineaccuracyshorttermreproducibilityandacomparisonwithconventionalquantitativecomputedtomography