Cargando…

Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours

Diarrhoeal disease (scours) in piglets, often associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), is a substantial financial burden to the pig industry worldwide. Previous research has not explicitly examined the relationships between farm, pen and microbiological factors. Here we present a sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCormick, Benjamin J. J., Van Breda, Lechelle K., Ward, Michael P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06399-2
_version_ 1783252558594179072
author McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Van Breda, Lechelle K.
Ward, Michael P.
author_facet McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Van Breda, Lechelle K.
Ward, Michael P.
author_sort McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
collection PubMed
description Diarrhoeal disease (scours) in piglets, often associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), is a substantial financial burden to the pig industry worldwide. Previous research has not explicitly examined the relationships between farm, pen and microbiological factors. Here we present a state of the art analysis to reveal empirical indirect – as well as direct – associations between management factors as putative risks for scours in pre- and post-weaned piglets. A Bayesian Network is constructed to identify the optimal structural model describing the relationships between risk factors. An additive model is then built to estimate more epidemiologically familiar odds ratios. Farm-level variance dominates the model, making many pen-level associations null. However, there is evidence that pre-weaning scours are less likely on farms with <400 sows (0.14, 0.03–0.50). Our results strongly suggest that smaller production units (piglets/pen) could reduce the incidence of scours in piglets. There is also some evidence that ownership of other livestock is a potential risk factor for pre-weaning scours, although this was observed only at one farm. Future research should be directed at better understanding the role of herd size and investigating the relationship between managing other livestock and the occurrence of scours in pig herds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5524950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55249502017-07-26 Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours McCormick, Benjamin J. J. Van Breda, Lechelle K. Ward, Michael P. Sci Rep Article Diarrhoeal disease (scours) in piglets, often associated with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), is a substantial financial burden to the pig industry worldwide. Previous research has not explicitly examined the relationships between farm, pen and microbiological factors. Here we present a state of the art analysis to reveal empirical indirect – as well as direct – associations between management factors as putative risks for scours in pre- and post-weaned piglets. A Bayesian Network is constructed to identify the optimal structural model describing the relationships between risk factors. An additive model is then built to estimate more epidemiologically familiar odds ratios. Farm-level variance dominates the model, making many pen-level associations null. However, there is evidence that pre-weaning scours are less likely on farms with <400 sows (0.14, 0.03–0.50). Our results strongly suggest that smaller production units (piglets/pen) could reduce the incidence of scours in piglets. There is also some evidence that ownership of other livestock is a potential risk factor for pre-weaning scours, although this was observed only at one farm. Future research should be directed at better understanding the role of herd size and investigating the relationship between managing other livestock and the occurrence of scours in pig herds. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5524950/ /pubmed/28740158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06399-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
McCormick, Benjamin J. J.
Van Breda, Lechelle K.
Ward, Michael P.
Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title_full Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title_fullStr Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title_short Bayesian Network analysis of piglet scours
title_sort bayesian network analysis of piglet scours
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28740158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06399-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormickbenjaminjj bayesiannetworkanalysisofpigletscours
AT vanbredalechellek bayesiannetworkanalysisofpigletscours
AT wardmichaelp bayesiannetworkanalysisofpigletscours