Cargando…

Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature

Biomaterials’ structural characteristics and the addition of osteoinductors influence the osteointegration capacity of bone substitutes. This study aims to identify the characteristics of porous and resorbable bone substitutes that influence new bone formation. An Internet search for studies reporti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela, dos Santos, Mariana Avelino, Cimatti, Bruno, Gava, Nelson Fabrício, Riberto, Marcelo, Engel, Edgard Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793006
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(07)10
_version_ 1783252589128712192
author Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela
dos Santos, Mariana Avelino
Cimatti, Bruno
Gava, Nelson Fabrício
Riberto, Marcelo
Engel, Edgard Eduard
author_facet Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela
dos Santos, Mariana Avelino
Cimatti, Bruno
Gava, Nelson Fabrício
Riberto, Marcelo
Engel, Edgard Eduard
author_sort Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela
collection PubMed
description Biomaterials’ structural characteristics and the addition of osteoinductors influence the osteointegration capacity of bone substitutes. This study aims to identify the characteristics of porous and resorbable bone substitutes that influence new bone formation. An Internet search for studies reporting new bone formation rates in bone defects filled with porous and resorbable substitutes was performed in duplicate using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, and University of São Paulo Digital Library databases. Metaphyseal or calvarial bone defects 4 to 10 mm in diameter from various animal models were selected. New bone formation rates were collected from the histomorphometry or micro-CT data. The following variables were analyzed: animal model, bone region, defect diameter, follow-up time after implantation, basic substitute material, osteoinductor addition, pore size and porosity. Of 3,266 initially identified articles, 15 articles describing 32 experimental groups met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences between the groups in the experimental model characteristics, except for the follow-up time, which showed a very weak to moderate correlation with the rate of new bone formation. In terms of the biomaterial and structural characteristics, only porosity showed a significant influence on the rate of new bone formation. Higher porosity is related to higher new bone formation rates. The influence of other characteristics could not be identified, possibly due to the large variety of experimental models and methodologies used to estimate new bone formation rates. We suggest the inclusion of standard control groups in future experimental studies to compare biomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55251652017-07-26 Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela dos Santos, Mariana Avelino Cimatti, Bruno Gava, Nelson Fabrício Riberto, Marcelo Engel, Edgard Eduard Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review Biomaterials’ structural characteristics and the addition of osteoinductors influence the osteointegration capacity of bone substitutes. This study aims to identify the characteristics of porous and resorbable bone substitutes that influence new bone formation. An Internet search for studies reporting new bone formation rates in bone defects filled with porous and resorbable substitutes was performed in duplicate using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, and University of São Paulo Digital Library databases. Metaphyseal or calvarial bone defects 4 to 10 mm in diameter from various animal models were selected. New bone formation rates were collected from the histomorphometry or micro-CT data. The following variables were analyzed: animal model, bone region, defect diameter, follow-up time after implantation, basic substitute material, osteoinductor addition, pore size and porosity. Of 3,266 initially identified articles, 15 articles describing 32 experimental groups met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences between the groups in the experimental model characteristics, except for the follow-up time, which showed a very weak to moderate correlation with the rate of new bone formation. In terms of the biomaterial and structural characteristics, only porosity showed a significant influence on the rate of new bone formation. Higher porosity is related to higher new bone formation rates. The influence of other characteristics could not be identified, possibly due to the large variety of experimental models and methodologies used to estimate new bone formation rates. We suggest the inclusion of standard control groups in future experimental studies to compare biomaterials. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2017-07 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5525165/ /pubmed/28793006 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(07)10 Text en Copyright © 2017 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Paulo, Maria Júlia Escanhoela
dos Santos, Mariana Avelino
Cimatti, Bruno
Gava, Nelson Fabrício
Riberto, Marcelo
Engel, Edgard Eduard
Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title_full Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title_short Osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: A systematic review of the literature
title_sort osteointegration of porous absorbable bone substitutes: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793006
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(07)10
work_keys_str_mv AT paulomariajuliaescanhoela osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT dossantosmarianaavelino osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT cimattibruno osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gavanelsonfabricio osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ribertomarcelo osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT engeledgardeduard osteointegrationofporousabsorbablebonesubstitutesasystematicreviewoftheliterature