Cargando…

The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria

BACKGROUND: Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is common with a prevalence of 6% of all patients fulfilling the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. MINOCA should be considered a working diagnosis. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging has recently been suggested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tornvall, Per, Brolin, E. B., Caidahl, K., Cederlund, K., Collste, O., Daniel, M., Ekenbäck, C., Jensen, J., Y-Hassan, S., Henareh, L., Hofman-Bang, C., Lyngå, P., Maret, E., Sarkar, N., Spaak, J., Sundqvist, M., Sörensson, P., Ugander, M., Agewall, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0611-5
_version_ 1783252620910002176
author Tornvall, Per
Brolin, E. B.
Caidahl, K.
Cederlund, K.
Collste, O.
Daniel, M.
Ekenbäck, C.
Jensen, J.
Y-Hassan, S.
Henareh, L.
Hofman-Bang, C.
Lyngå, P.
Maret, E.
Sarkar, N.
Spaak, J.
Sundqvist, M.
Sörensson, P.
Ugander, M.
Agewall, S.
author_facet Tornvall, Per
Brolin, E. B.
Caidahl, K.
Cederlund, K.
Collste, O.
Daniel, M.
Ekenbäck, C.
Jensen, J.
Y-Hassan, S.
Henareh, L.
Hofman-Bang, C.
Lyngå, P.
Maret, E.
Sarkar, N.
Spaak, J.
Sundqvist, M.
Sörensson, P.
Ugander, M.
Agewall, S.
author_sort Tornvall, Per
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is common with a prevalence of 6% of all patients fulfilling the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. MINOCA should be considered a working diagnosis. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging has recently been suggested to be of great value to determine the cause behind MINOCA. The objectives of this paper are to describe the rationale behind the second Stockholm Myocardial Infarction with Normal Coronaries (SMINC-2) study and to discuss the protocol for investigation of MINOCA patients in the light of the recently published position paper from the European Society of Cardiology. METHODS: The SMINC-2 study is an open non-randomised study using historical controls for comparison. The primary aim is to prove that MINOCA patients investigated with the latest CMR imaging technique can achieve a diagnosis in 70% of all cases entirely by imaging. By including 150 patients we will have >80% chance to prove that the diagnostic accuracy can be improved by 20 absolute % with a p-value of less than 0.05 when compared with CMR imaging in the SMINC-1 study. Furthermore, in addition to invasive coronary angiography, coronary arteries are evaluated by computed tomography angiography to investigate coronary causes and questionnaires are used to describe Quality-of-Life (QoL). By January 1st 2017, 75 patients have been included. DISCUSSION: Whether CMR imaging can provide a diagnosis to an adequate proportion of MINOCA patients is unknown. Well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to compare a MINOCA cohort from the population with an appropriate control group. Positive results are likely to influence future guidelines of the management of MINOCA. Furthermore, the study will give mechanistic insights into MINOCA in particular in patients with “true” myocardial infarction and describe QoL in this vulnerable group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT02318498.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55253012017-07-26 The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria Tornvall, Per Brolin, E. B. Caidahl, K. Cederlund, K. Collste, O. Daniel, M. Ekenbäck, C. Jensen, J. Y-Hassan, S. Henareh, L. Hofman-Bang, C. Lyngå, P. Maret, E. Sarkar, N. Spaak, J. Sundqvist, M. Sörensson, P. Ugander, M. Agewall, S. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is common with a prevalence of 6% of all patients fulfilling the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. MINOCA should be considered a working diagnosis. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging has recently been suggested to be of great value to determine the cause behind MINOCA. The objectives of this paper are to describe the rationale behind the second Stockholm Myocardial Infarction with Normal Coronaries (SMINC-2) study and to discuss the protocol for investigation of MINOCA patients in the light of the recently published position paper from the European Society of Cardiology. METHODS: The SMINC-2 study is an open non-randomised study using historical controls for comparison. The primary aim is to prove that MINOCA patients investigated with the latest CMR imaging technique can achieve a diagnosis in 70% of all cases entirely by imaging. By including 150 patients we will have >80% chance to prove that the diagnostic accuracy can be improved by 20 absolute % with a p-value of less than 0.05 when compared with CMR imaging in the SMINC-1 study. Furthermore, in addition to invasive coronary angiography, coronary arteries are evaluated by computed tomography angiography to investigate coronary causes and questionnaires are used to describe Quality-of-Life (QoL). By January 1st 2017, 75 patients have been included. DISCUSSION: Whether CMR imaging can provide a diagnosis to an adequate proportion of MINOCA patients is unknown. Well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to compare a MINOCA cohort from the population with an appropriate control group. Positive results are likely to influence future guidelines of the management of MINOCA. Furthermore, the study will give mechanistic insights into MINOCA in particular in patients with “true” myocardial infarction and describe QoL in this vulnerable group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT02318498. BioMed Central 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5525301/ /pubmed/28738781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0611-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tornvall, Per
Brolin, E. B.
Caidahl, K.
Cederlund, K.
Collste, O.
Daniel, M.
Ekenbäck, C.
Jensen, J.
Y-Hassan, S.
Henareh, L.
Hofman-Bang, C.
Lyngå, P.
Maret, E.
Sarkar, N.
Spaak, J.
Sundqvist, M.
Sörensson, P.
Ugander, M.
Agewall, S.
The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title_full The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title_fullStr The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title_full_unstemmed The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title_short The value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
title_sort value of a new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocol in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (minoca) – a case-control study using historical controls from a previous study with similar inclusion criteria
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0611-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tornvallper thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT brolineb thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT caidahlk thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT cederlundk thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT collsteo thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT danielm thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT ekenbackc thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT jensenj thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT yhassans thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT henarehl thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT hofmanbangc thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT lyngap thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT marete thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sarkarn thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT spaakj thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sundqvistm thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sorenssonp thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT uganderm thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT agewalls thevalueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT tornvallper valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT brolineb valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT caidahlk valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT cederlundk valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT collsteo valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT danielm valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT ekenbackc valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT jensenj valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT yhassans valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT henarehl valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT hofmanbangc valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT lyngap valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT marete valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sarkarn valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT spaakj valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sundqvistm valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT sorenssonp valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT uganderm valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria
AT agewalls valueofanewcardiacmagneticresonanceimagingprotocolinmyocardialinfarctionwithnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaacasecontrolstudyusinghistoricalcontrolsfromapreviousstudywithsimilarinclusioncriteria