Cargando…

Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND: Both cupping therapy and acupuncture have been used in China for a long time, and their target indications are pain-related conditions. There is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of these two therapies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the beneficial effectiveness and safety between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ya-Jing, Cao, Hui-Juan, Li, Xin-Lin, Yang, Xiao-Ying, Lai, Bao-Yong, Yang, Guo-Yang, Liu, Jian-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-017-0142-0
_version_ 1783252634235305984
author Zhang, Ya-Jing
Cao, Hui-Juan
Li, Xin-Lin
Yang, Xiao-Ying
Lai, Bao-Yong
Yang, Guo-Yang
Liu, Jian-Ping
author_facet Zhang, Ya-Jing
Cao, Hui-Juan
Li, Xin-Lin
Yang, Xiao-Ying
Lai, Bao-Yong
Yang, Guo-Yang
Liu, Jian-Ping
author_sort Zhang, Ya-Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both cupping therapy and acupuncture have been used in China for a long time, and their target indications are pain-related conditions. There is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of these two therapies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the beneficial effectiveness and safety between cupping therapy and acupuncture for pain-related conditions to provide evidence for clinical practice. METHODS: Protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016050986). We conducted literature search from six electronic databases until 31st March 2017. We included randomized trials comparing cupping therapy with acupuncture on pain-related conditions. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by risk of bias tool. Mean difference, risk ratio, risk difference and their 95% confidence interval were used to report the estimate effect of the pooled results through meta-analysis or the results from each individual study. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to adjust random errors and calculate the sample size. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized trials with 2845 participants were included covering 12 pain-related conditions. All included studies were of poor methodological quality. Three meta-analyses were conducted, which showed similar clinical beneficial effects of cupping therapy and acupuncture for the rate of symptom improvement in cervical spondylosis (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.26; n = 646), lateral femoral cutaneous neuritis (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.22; n = 102) and scapulohumeral periarthritis (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.51; n = 208). Results from other outcomes (such as visual analogue and numerical rating scale) in each study also showed no statistical significant difference between these two therapies for all included pain-related conditions. The results of TSA for cervical spondylosis demonstrated that the current available data have not reached a powerful conclusion. No serious adverse events related to cupping therapy or acupuncture was found in included studies. CONCLUSION: Cupping therapy and acupuncture are potentially safe, and they have similar effectiveness in relieving pain. However, further rigorous studies investigating relevant pain-related conditions are warranted to establish comparative effectiveness analysis between these two therapies. Cost-effectiveness studies should be considered in the future studies to establish evidence for decision-making in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55253752017-08-02 Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis Zhang, Ya-Jing Cao, Hui-Juan Li, Xin-Lin Yang, Xiao-Ying Lai, Bao-Yong Yang, Guo-Yang Liu, Jian-Ping Chin Med Review BACKGROUND: Both cupping therapy and acupuncture have been used in China for a long time, and their target indications are pain-related conditions. There is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of these two therapies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the beneficial effectiveness and safety between cupping therapy and acupuncture for pain-related conditions to provide evidence for clinical practice. METHODS: Protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016050986). We conducted literature search from six electronic databases until 31st March 2017. We included randomized trials comparing cupping therapy with acupuncture on pain-related conditions. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by risk of bias tool. Mean difference, risk ratio, risk difference and their 95% confidence interval were used to report the estimate effect of the pooled results through meta-analysis or the results from each individual study. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to adjust random errors and calculate the sample size. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized trials with 2845 participants were included covering 12 pain-related conditions. All included studies were of poor methodological quality. Three meta-analyses were conducted, which showed similar clinical beneficial effects of cupping therapy and acupuncture for the rate of symptom improvement in cervical spondylosis (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.26; n = 646), lateral femoral cutaneous neuritis (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.22; n = 102) and scapulohumeral periarthritis (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.51; n = 208). Results from other outcomes (such as visual analogue and numerical rating scale) in each study also showed no statistical significant difference between these two therapies for all included pain-related conditions. The results of TSA for cervical spondylosis demonstrated that the current available data have not reached a powerful conclusion. No serious adverse events related to cupping therapy or acupuncture was found in included studies. CONCLUSION: Cupping therapy and acupuncture are potentially safe, and they have similar effectiveness in relieving pain. However, further rigorous studies investigating relevant pain-related conditions are warranted to establish comparative effectiveness analysis between these two therapies. Cost-effectiveness studies should be considered in the future studies to establish evidence for decision-making in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5525375/ /pubmed/28770000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-017-0142-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Zhang, Ya-Jing
Cao, Hui-Juan
Li, Xin-Lin
Yang, Xiao-Ying
Lai, Bao-Yong
Yang, Guo-Yang
Liu, Jian-Ping
Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title_full Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title_short Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
title_sort cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-017-0142-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyajing cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT caohuijuan cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT lixinlin cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangxiaoying cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT laibaoyong cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yangguoyang cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT liujianping cuppingtherapyversusacupunctureforpainrelatedconditionsasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandtrialsequentialanalysis