Cargando…

Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen

Artificial insemination (AI) is the preferred method for reproduction in the majority of the intensive pig production systems Worldwide. To this end, fresh extended ready-to-use semen doses are either purchased from AI-centres or produced by boars kept on-farm. For profitable semen production, it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso, Van Soom, Ann, Arsenakis, Ioannis, Maes, Dominiek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5
_version_ 1783252635145469952
author Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso
Van Soom, Ann
Arsenakis, Ioannis
Maes, Dominiek
author_facet Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso
Van Soom, Ann
Arsenakis, Ioannis
Maes, Dominiek
author_sort Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso
collection PubMed
description Artificial insemination (AI) is the preferred method for reproduction in the majority of the intensive pig production systems Worldwide. To this end, fresh extended ready-to-use semen doses are either purchased from AI-centres or produced by boars kept on-farm. For profitable semen production, it is necessary to obtain a maximum amount of high quality semen from each boar. This paper reviews current knowledge on factors that may affect semen quality by influencing the boar or the semen during processing. Genetic markers could be used for early detection of boars with the highest fertility potential. Genetic selection for fast growth might jeopardize semen quality. Early detection of boars no longer fit for semen production might be possible by ultrasonography of the testes. Seasonal variation in sperm quality could be associated with changes in photoperiod and heat stress during summer. Comfortable housing, with appropiate bedding material to avoid locomotion problems is essential. In some areas, cooling systems may be necessary to avoid heat stress. The sperm quality can be manipulated by feeding strategies aiming, for instance, to increase sperm resistance to oxidative stress and extend storage duration. High collection frequency will negatively influence sperm quality. Also, if collection is not hygienically performed it will result in bacterial contamination of the semen doses. The concern over bacterial contamination has risen not only because of its negative effect on semen quality but also due to the detection of antimicrobial resistance in isolates from extended semen. Moreover, bacterial and viral pathogens must be monitored because they affect semen production and quality and constitute a risk of herd infection. During processing, boar sperm are submitted to many stress factors that can cause oxidative stress and capacitation-like changes potentially reducing their fertility potential. Dilution rate or dilution temperature affects the quality of the semen doses. Some packaging might preserve semen better than others and some plastic components might be toxic for sperm. Standard operation procedures and quality assurance systems in AI centres are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55254382017-08-02 Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso Van Soom, Ann Arsenakis, Ioannis Maes, Dominiek Porcine Health Manag Review Artificial insemination (AI) is the preferred method for reproduction in the majority of the intensive pig production systems Worldwide. To this end, fresh extended ready-to-use semen doses are either purchased from AI-centres or produced by boars kept on-farm. For profitable semen production, it is necessary to obtain a maximum amount of high quality semen from each boar. This paper reviews current knowledge on factors that may affect semen quality by influencing the boar or the semen during processing. Genetic markers could be used for early detection of boars with the highest fertility potential. Genetic selection for fast growth might jeopardize semen quality. Early detection of boars no longer fit for semen production might be possible by ultrasonography of the testes. Seasonal variation in sperm quality could be associated with changes in photoperiod and heat stress during summer. Comfortable housing, with appropiate bedding material to avoid locomotion problems is essential. In some areas, cooling systems may be necessary to avoid heat stress. The sperm quality can be manipulated by feeding strategies aiming, for instance, to increase sperm resistance to oxidative stress and extend storage duration. High collection frequency will negatively influence sperm quality. Also, if collection is not hygienically performed it will result in bacterial contamination of the semen doses. The concern over bacterial contamination has risen not only because of its negative effect on semen quality but also due to the detection of antimicrobial resistance in isolates from extended semen. Moreover, bacterial and viral pathogens must be monitored because they affect semen production and quality and constitute a risk of herd infection. During processing, boar sperm are submitted to many stress factors that can cause oxidative stress and capacitation-like changes potentially reducing their fertility potential. Dilution rate or dilution temperature affects the quality of the semen doses. Some packaging might preserve semen better than others and some plastic components might be toxic for sperm. Standard operation procedures and quality assurance systems in AI centres are needed. BioMed Central 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5525438/ /pubmed/28770098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Lopez Rodriguez, Alfonso
Van Soom, Ann
Arsenakis, Ioannis
Maes, Dominiek
Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title_full Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title_fullStr Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title_full_unstemmed Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title_short Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
title_sort boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezrodriguezalfonso boarmanagementandsemenhandlingfactorsaffectthequalityofboarextendedsemen
AT vansoomann boarmanagementandsemenhandlingfactorsaffectthequalityofboarextendedsemen
AT arsenakisioannis boarmanagementandsemenhandlingfactorsaffectthequalityofboarextendedsemen
AT maesdominiek boarmanagementandsemenhandlingfactorsaffectthequalityofboarextendedsemen