Cargando…

Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating the design and dimensions of five different brands of orthodontic mini-implants, as well as their influence on torsional fracture strength. METHODS: Fifty mini-implants were divided into five groups corresponding to different manufactures (DEN, RMO, CON, NEO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres, Kitahara-Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes, Silveira, Giordani Santos, Elias, Carlos Nelson, Mucha, José Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28746487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.047-054.oar
_version_ 1783252636733014016
author Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres
Kitahara-Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes
Silveira, Giordani Santos
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Mucha, José Nelson
author_facet Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres
Kitahara-Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes
Silveira, Giordani Santos
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Mucha, José Nelson
author_sort Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating the design and dimensions of five different brands of orthodontic mini-implants, as well as their influence on torsional fracture strength. METHODS: Fifty mini-implants were divided into five groups corresponding to different manufactures (DEN, RMO, CON, NEO, SIN). Twenty-five mini-implants were subjected to fracture test by torsion in the neck and the tip, through arbors attached to a Universal Mechanical Testing Machine. The other 25 mini-implants were subjected to insertion torque test into blocks of pork ribs using a torquimeter and contra-angle handpiece mounted in a surgical motor. The shape of the active tip of the mini-implants was evaluated under microscopy. The non-parametric Friedman test and Snedecor’s F in analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate the differences between groups. RESULTS: The fracture torque of the neck ranged from 23.45 N.cm (DEN) to 34.82 N.cm (SIN), and of the tip ranged from 9.35 N.cm (CON) to 24.36 N.cm (NEO). Insertion torque values ranged from 6.6 N.cm (RMO) to 10.2 N.cm (NEO). The characteristics that most influenced the results were outer diameter, inner diameter, the ratio between internal and external diameters, and the existence of milling in the apical region of the mini-implant. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture torques were different for both the neck and the tip of the five types evaluated. NEO and SIN mini-implants showed the highest resistance to fracture of the neck and tip. The fracture torques of both tip and neck were higher than the torque required to insert mini-implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55254452017-08-09 Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres Kitahara-Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes Silveira, Giordani Santos Elias, Carlos Nelson Mucha, José Nelson Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at evaluating the design and dimensions of five different brands of orthodontic mini-implants, as well as their influence on torsional fracture strength. METHODS: Fifty mini-implants were divided into five groups corresponding to different manufactures (DEN, RMO, CON, NEO, SIN). Twenty-five mini-implants were subjected to fracture test by torsion in the neck and the tip, through arbors attached to a Universal Mechanical Testing Machine. The other 25 mini-implants were subjected to insertion torque test into blocks of pork ribs using a torquimeter and contra-angle handpiece mounted in a surgical motor. The shape of the active tip of the mini-implants was evaluated under microscopy. The non-parametric Friedman test and Snedecor’s F in analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate the differences between groups. RESULTS: The fracture torque of the neck ranged from 23.45 N.cm (DEN) to 34.82 N.cm (SIN), and of the tip ranged from 9.35 N.cm (CON) to 24.36 N.cm (NEO). Insertion torque values ranged from 6.6 N.cm (RMO) to 10.2 N.cm (NEO). The characteristics that most influenced the results were outer diameter, inner diameter, the ratio between internal and external diameters, and the existence of milling in the apical region of the mini-implant. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture torques were different for both the neck and the tip of the five types evaluated. NEO and SIN mini-implants showed the highest resistance to fracture of the neck and tip. The fracture torques of both tip and neck were higher than the torque required to insert mini-implants. Dental Press International 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5525445/ /pubmed/28746487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.047-054.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Assad-Loss, Tatiana Feres
Kitahara-Céia, Flávia Mitiko Fernandes
Silveira, Giordani Santos
Elias, Carlos Nelson
Mucha, José Nelson
Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title_full Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title_fullStr Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title_full_unstemmed Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title_short Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
title_sort fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28746487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.047-054.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT assadlosstatianaferes fracturestrengthoforthodonticminiimplants
AT kitaharaceiaflaviamitikofernandes fracturestrengthoforthodonticminiimplants
AT silveiragiordanisantos fracturestrengthoforthodonticminiimplants
AT eliascarlosnelson fracturestrengthoforthodonticminiimplants
AT muchajosenelson fracturestrengthoforthodonticminiimplants