Cargando…

Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: This study describes the significance and temporal evolution of incidentally detected, presumed, metal-induced reactive periprosthetic masses in patients with metal on metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty and its management. The literature concerning the temporal evolution of these lesions is me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilania, Khushboo, Jankharia, Bhavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790473
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_260_16
_version_ 1783252654765375488
author Pilania, Khushboo
Jankharia, Bhavin
author_facet Pilania, Khushboo
Jankharia, Bhavin
author_sort Pilania, Khushboo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study describes the significance and temporal evolution of incidentally detected, presumed, metal-induced reactive periprosthetic masses in patients with metal on metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty and its management. The literature concerning the temporal evolution of these lesions is meagre and so it is still unclear, whether asymptomatic patients with periprosthetic collections should undergo revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MoM hip replacements fitted with a recalled implant (ASR, DuPuy) often undergo magnetic resonance imaging with metal artifact reduction sequences to look for complications. From a cohort of 136 asymptomatic patients, with 181 MoM hips, hips with a mention of periprosthetic masses in their reports at first presentation, and a repeat scan within 6 months to 3 years were selected for this retrospective study. Patients with complications such as loosening, osteomyelitis, and muscle/tendon tears were excluded from the study, and the final study cohort consisted of 55 MoM hips and 61 periprosthetic masses. Ethics committee approval is not required in our institution for retrospective studies. The followup scans of each patient were compared, and the periprosthetic masses were described to have progressed, regressed, or remained unchanged. RESULTS: Comparison revealed that 29 of the 61 reactive masses remained unchanged, 20 regressed, while only 12 showed progression. The study, therefore, has maximum power as the outcome of interest, i.e., regression or unchanged status of the pseudotumors, was seen in approximately 80% (more than half) of the study group. The P value of the study was < 0.005. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic soft tissue masses are not uncommon in patients with MoM hips. The majority of them in asymptomatic individuals remain stable or regress in the short to medium term, and close followup or decisions on revision surgery may not be warranted in asymptomatic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55255252017-08-08 Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study Pilania, Khushboo Jankharia, Bhavin Indian J Orthop Symposium - Total Hip Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: This study describes the significance and temporal evolution of incidentally detected, presumed, metal-induced reactive periprosthetic masses in patients with metal on metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty and its management. The literature concerning the temporal evolution of these lesions is meagre and so it is still unclear, whether asymptomatic patients with periprosthetic collections should undergo revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MoM hip replacements fitted with a recalled implant (ASR, DuPuy) often undergo magnetic resonance imaging with metal artifact reduction sequences to look for complications. From a cohort of 136 asymptomatic patients, with 181 MoM hips, hips with a mention of periprosthetic masses in their reports at first presentation, and a repeat scan within 6 months to 3 years were selected for this retrospective study. Patients with complications such as loosening, osteomyelitis, and muscle/tendon tears were excluded from the study, and the final study cohort consisted of 55 MoM hips and 61 periprosthetic masses. Ethics committee approval is not required in our institution for retrospective studies. The followup scans of each patient were compared, and the periprosthetic masses were described to have progressed, regressed, or remained unchanged. RESULTS: Comparison revealed that 29 of the 61 reactive masses remained unchanged, 20 regressed, while only 12 showed progression. The study, therefore, has maximum power as the outcome of interest, i.e., regression or unchanged status of the pseudotumors, was seen in approximately 80% (more than half) of the study group. The P value of the study was < 0.005. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic soft tissue masses are not uncommon in patients with MoM hips. The majority of them in asymptomatic individuals remain stable or regress in the short to medium term, and close followup or decisions on revision surgery may not be warranted in asymptomatic patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5525525/ /pubmed/28790473 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_260_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Symposium - Total Hip Arthroplasty
Pilania, Khushboo
Jankharia, Bhavin
Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title_full Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title_short Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective Study
title_sort longitudinal followup of incidentally detected pseudotumors in patients with metal on metal implants: a retrospective study
topic Symposium - Total Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790473
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_260_16
work_keys_str_mv AT pilaniakhushboo longitudinalfollowupofincidentallydetectedpseudotumorsinpatientswithmetalonmetalimplantsaretrospectivestudy
AT jankhariabhavin longitudinalfollowupofincidentallydetectedpseudotumorsinpatientswithmetalonmetalimplantsaretrospectivestudy