Cargando…
Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068 |
_version_ | 1783252663468556288 |
---|---|
author | Deans, Zandra C. Allen, Stephanie Jenkins, Lucy Khawaja, Farrah Hastings, Ros J. Mann, Kathy Patton, Simon J. Sistermans, Erik A. Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_facet | Deans, Zandra C. Allen, Stephanie Jenkins, Lucy Khawaja, Farrah Hastings, Ros J. Mann, Kathy Patton, Simon J. Sistermans, Erik A. Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_sort | Deans, Zandra C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelines. METHODS: All laboratories registered in the three European quality assurance schemes for molecular and cytogenetics were invited to complete an online survey focused on services provided for NIPT and non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis. Laboratories delivering NIPT for aneuploidy were asked to submit two example reports; one high and one low risk result. Reports were reviewed for content and discussed at a meeting of laboratory providers and clinicians held at the ISPD 2016 conference in Berlin. RESULTS: Of the 122 laboratories that responded, 50 issued reports for NIPT and 43 of these submitted sample reports. Responses and reports were discussed by 72 attendees at the meeting. Consensus opinion was determined in several areas and used to develop best practice guidelines for reporting of NIPT results. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, there is considerable variation in reporting NIPT results. Here, we describe minimum best practice guidelines, which will be distributed to European laboratories, and reports audited in subsequent external quality assurance cycles. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5525582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55255822017-08-09 Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion Deans, Zandra C. Allen, Stephanie Jenkins, Lucy Khawaja, Farrah Hastings, Ros J. Mann, Kathy Patton, Simon J. Sistermans, Erik A. Chitty, Lyn S. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelines. METHODS: All laboratories registered in the three European quality assurance schemes for molecular and cytogenetics were invited to complete an online survey focused on services provided for NIPT and non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis. Laboratories delivering NIPT for aneuploidy were asked to submit two example reports; one high and one low risk result. Reports were reviewed for content and discussed at a meeting of laboratory providers and clinicians held at the ISPD 2016 conference in Berlin. RESULTS: Of the 122 laboratories that responded, 50 issued reports for NIPT and 43 of these submitted sample reports. Responses and reports were discussed by 72 attendees at the meeting. Consensus opinion was determined in several areas and used to develop best practice guidelines for reporting of NIPT results. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, there is considerable variation in reporting NIPT results. Here, we describe minimum best practice guidelines, which will be distributed to European laboratories, and reports audited in subsequent external quality assurance cycles. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-08 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5525582/ /pubmed/28497584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Deans, Zandra C. Allen, Stephanie Jenkins, Lucy Khawaja, Farrah Hastings, Ros J. Mann, Kathy Patton, Simon J. Sistermans, Erik A. Chitty, Lyn S. Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title | Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title_full | Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title_fullStr | Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title_short | Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
title_sort | recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deanszandrac recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT allenstephanie recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT jenkinslucy recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT khawajafarrah recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT hastingsrosj recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT mannkathy recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT pattonsimonj recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT sistermanserika recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion AT chittylyns recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion |