Cargando…

Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion

OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deans, Zandra C., Allen, Stephanie, Jenkins, Lucy, Khawaja, Farrah, Hastings, Ros J., Mann, Kathy, Patton, Simon J., Sistermans, Erik A., Chitty, Lyn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068
_version_ 1783252663468556288
author Deans, Zandra C.
Allen, Stephanie
Jenkins, Lucy
Khawaja, Farrah
Hastings, Ros J.
Mann, Kathy
Patton, Simon J.
Sistermans, Erik A.
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_facet Deans, Zandra C.
Allen, Stephanie
Jenkins, Lucy
Khawaja, Farrah
Hastings, Ros J.
Mann, Kathy
Patton, Simon J.
Sistermans, Erik A.
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_sort Deans, Zandra C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelines. METHODS: All laboratories registered in the three European quality assurance schemes for molecular and cytogenetics were invited to complete an online survey focused on services provided for NIPT and non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis. Laboratories delivering NIPT for aneuploidy were asked to submit two example reports; one high and one low risk result. Reports were reviewed for content and discussed at a meeting of laboratory providers and clinicians held at the ISPD 2016 conference in Berlin. RESULTS: Of the 122 laboratories that responded, 50 issued reports for NIPT and 43 of these submitted sample reports. Responses and reports were discussed by 72 attendees at the meeting. Consensus opinion was determined in several areas and used to develop best practice guidelines for reporting of NIPT results. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, there is considerable variation in reporting NIPT results. Here, we describe minimum best practice guidelines, which will be distributed to European laboratories, and reports audited in subsequent external quality assurance cycles. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55255822017-08-09 Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion Deans, Zandra C. Allen, Stephanie Jenkins, Lucy Khawaja, Farrah Hastings, Ros J. Mann, Kathy Patton, Simon J. Sistermans, Erik A. Chitty, Lyn S. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelines. METHODS: All laboratories registered in the three European quality assurance schemes for molecular and cytogenetics were invited to complete an online survey focused on services provided for NIPT and non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis. Laboratories delivering NIPT for aneuploidy were asked to submit two example reports; one high and one low risk result. Reports were reviewed for content and discussed at a meeting of laboratory providers and clinicians held at the ISPD 2016 conference in Berlin. RESULTS: Of the 122 laboratories that responded, 50 issued reports for NIPT and 43 of these submitted sample reports. Responses and reports were discussed by 72 attendees at the meeting. Consensus opinion was determined in several areas and used to develop best practice guidelines for reporting of NIPT results. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, there is considerable variation in reporting NIPT results. Here, we describe minimum best practice guidelines, which will be distributed to European laboratories, and reports audited in subsequent external quality assurance cycles. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-08 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5525582/ /pubmed/28497584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Deans, Zandra C.
Allen, Stephanie
Jenkins, Lucy
Khawaja, Farrah
Hastings, Ros J.
Mann, Kathy
Patton, Simon J.
Sistermans, Erik A.
Chitty, Lyn S.
Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title_full Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title_fullStr Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title_full_unstemmed Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title_short Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
title_sort recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non‐invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5068
work_keys_str_mv AT deanszandrac recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT allenstephanie recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT jenkinslucy recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT khawajafarrah recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT hastingsrosj recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT mannkathy recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT pattonsimonj recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT sistermanserika recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion
AT chittylyns recommendedpracticeforlaboratoryreportingofnoninvasiveprenataltestingoftrisomies1318and21aconsensusopinion