Cargando…

Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy

BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torbicki, Emma, Oh, Justin, Mishra, Sharmistha, Page, Andrea V., Boggild, Andrea K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9
_version_ 1783252794740834304
author Torbicki, Emma
Oh, Justin
Mishra, Sharmistha
Page, Andrea V.
Boggild, Andrea K.
author_facet Torbicki, Emma
Oh, Justin
Mishra, Sharmistha
Page, Andrea V.
Boggild, Andrea K.
author_sort Torbicki, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, CAB abstracts, and the Cochrane Library to February 3, 2014 for intervention studies of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of PI-IBS and examined the evidence according to a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Of 336 records, 9 studies were included. Eight studies of pharmacologic interventions examined 5 agents (mesalazine or mesalamine, ondansetron, prednisolone, cholestyramine, and metronidazole). One study examined the non-pharmacologic intervention of different infant nutritional formulas following acute gastroenteritis. The quality of the evidence to date was low, with small sample size (fewer than 50 participants) and short duration of follow-up. Overall, the efficacy of pharmacological treatment ranged from no benefit (ondansetron and prednisolone) to moderately beneficial (cholestyramine and metronidazole). The evidence for mesalazine was equivocal: one study showed benefit, two others showed none. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in outcome measures and low strength of evidence preclude recommendations on the optimal management of PI-IBS by a specific agent. More comparative intervention research into PI-IBS treatment is needed for consistent best practice in PI-IBS management. Clinicians may elect to pursue therapeutic trials of mesalazine, cholestyramine, or metronidazole in individual patients, but should be aware that data supporting the efficacy of these agents is limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5526367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55263672017-09-07 Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy Torbicki, Emma Oh, Justin Mishra, Sharmistha Page, Andrea V. Boggild, Andrea K. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines Research BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, CAB abstracts, and the Cochrane Library to February 3, 2014 for intervention studies of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of PI-IBS and examined the evidence according to a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Of 336 records, 9 studies were included. Eight studies of pharmacologic interventions examined 5 agents (mesalazine or mesalamine, ondansetron, prednisolone, cholestyramine, and metronidazole). One study examined the non-pharmacologic intervention of different infant nutritional formulas following acute gastroenteritis. The quality of the evidence to date was low, with small sample size (fewer than 50 participants) and short duration of follow-up. Overall, the efficacy of pharmacological treatment ranged from no benefit (ondansetron and prednisolone) to moderately beneficial (cholestyramine and metronidazole). The evidence for mesalazine was equivocal: one study showed benefit, two others showed none. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in outcome measures and low strength of evidence preclude recommendations on the optimal management of PI-IBS by a specific agent. More comparative intervention research into PI-IBS treatment is needed for consistent best practice in PI-IBS management. Clinicians may elect to pursue therapeutic trials of mesalazine, cholestyramine, or metronidazole in individual patients, but should be aware that data supporting the efficacy of these agents is limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5526367/ /pubmed/28883933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9 Text en © Torbicki et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Torbicki, Emma
Oh, Justin
Mishra, Sharmistha
Page, Andrea V.
Boggild, Andrea K.
Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title_full Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title_fullStr Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title_short Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
title_sort interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9
work_keys_str_mv AT torbickiemma interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy
AT ohjustin interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy
AT mishrasharmistha interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy
AT pageandreav interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy
AT boggildandreak interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy