Cargando…
Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy
BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9 |
_version_ | 1783252794740834304 |
---|---|
author | Torbicki, Emma Oh, Justin Mishra, Sharmistha Page, Andrea V. Boggild, Andrea K. |
author_facet | Torbicki, Emma Oh, Justin Mishra, Sharmistha Page, Andrea V. Boggild, Andrea K. |
author_sort | Torbicki, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, CAB abstracts, and the Cochrane Library to February 3, 2014 for intervention studies of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of PI-IBS and examined the evidence according to a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Of 336 records, 9 studies were included. Eight studies of pharmacologic interventions examined 5 agents (mesalazine or mesalamine, ondansetron, prednisolone, cholestyramine, and metronidazole). One study examined the non-pharmacologic intervention of different infant nutritional formulas following acute gastroenteritis. The quality of the evidence to date was low, with small sample size (fewer than 50 participants) and short duration of follow-up. Overall, the efficacy of pharmacological treatment ranged from no benefit (ondansetron and prednisolone) to moderately beneficial (cholestyramine and metronidazole). The evidence for mesalazine was equivocal: one study showed benefit, two others showed none. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in outcome measures and low strength of evidence preclude recommendations on the optimal management of PI-IBS by a specific agent. More comparative intervention research into PI-IBS treatment is needed for consistent best practice in PI-IBS management. Clinicians may elect to pursue therapeutic trials of mesalazine, cholestyramine, or metronidazole in individual patients, but should be aware that data supporting the efficacy of these agents is limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5526367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55263672017-09-07 Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy Torbicki, Emma Oh, Justin Mishra, Sharmistha Page, Andrea V. Boggild, Andrea K. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines Research BACKGROUND: Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) due to traveler’s diarrhea is the second most common illness seen in post-travel clinics, yet its optimal management remains unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment efficacy in PI-IBS. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, CAB abstracts, and the Cochrane Library to February 3, 2014 for intervention studies of the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of PI-IBS and examined the evidence according to a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Of 336 records, 9 studies were included. Eight studies of pharmacologic interventions examined 5 agents (mesalazine or mesalamine, ondansetron, prednisolone, cholestyramine, and metronidazole). One study examined the non-pharmacologic intervention of different infant nutritional formulas following acute gastroenteritis. The quality of the evidence to date was low, with small sample size (fewer than 50 participants) and short duration of follow-up. Overall, the efficacy of pharmacological treatment ranged from no benefit (ondansetron and prednisolone) to moderately beneficial (cholestyramine and metronidazole). The evidence for mesalazine was equivocal: one study showed benefit, two others showed none. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in outcome measures and low strength of evidence preclude recommendations on the optimal management of PI-IBS by a specific agent. More comparative intervention research into PI-IBS treatment is needed for consistent best practice in PI-IBS management. Clinicians may elect to pursue therapeutic trials of mesalazine, cholestyramine, or metronidazole in individual patients, but should be aware that data supporting the efficacy of these agents is limited. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5526367/ /pubmed/28883933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9 Text en © Torbicki et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Torbicki, Emma Oh, Justin Mishra, Sharmistha Page, Andrea V. Boggild, Andrea K. Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title | Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title_full | Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title_fullStr | Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title_short | Interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
title_sort | interventions for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of treatment efficacy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0002-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torbickiemma interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy AT ohjustin interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy AT mishrasharmistha interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy AT pageandreav interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy AT boggildandreak interventionsforpostinfectiousirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewoftreatmentefficacy |