Cargando…
Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site
Fragment-based lead discovery is becoming an increasingly popular strategy for drug discovery. Fragment screening identifies weakly binding compounds that require optimization to become high-affinity leads. As design of leads from fragments is challenging, reliable computational methods to guide opt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28743961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04905-0 |
_version_ | 1783252864068485120 |
---|---|
author | Matricon, Pierre Ranganathan, Anirudh Warnick, Eugene Gao, Zhan-Guo Rudling, Axel Lambertucci, Catia Marucci, Gabriella Ezzati, Aitakin Jaiteh, Mariama Dal Ben, Diego Jacobson, Kenneth A. Carlsson, Jens |
author_facet | Matricon, Pierre Ranganathan, Anirudh Warnick, Eugene Gao, Zhan-Guo Rudling, Axel Lambertucci, Catia Marucci, Gabriella Ezzati, Aitakin Jaiteh, Mariama Dal Ben, Diego Jacobson, Kenneth A. Carlsson, Jens |
author_sort | Matricon, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fragment-based lead discovery is becoming an increasingly popular strategy for drug discovery. Fragment screening identifies weakly binding compounds that require optimization to become high-affinity leads. As design of leads from fragments is challenging, reliable computational methods to guide optimization would be invaluable. We evaluated using molecular dynamics simulations and the free energy perturbation method (MD/FEP) in fragment optimization for the A(2A) adenosine receptor, a pharmaceutically relevant G protein-coupled receptor. Optimization of fragments exploring two binding site subpockets was probed by calculating relative binding affinities for 23 adenine derivatives, resulting in strong agreement with experimental data (R(2) = 0.78). The predictive power of MD/FEP was significantly better than that of an empirical scoring function. We also demonstrated the potential of the MD/FEP to assess multiple binding modes and to tailor the thermodynamic profile of ligands during optimization. Finally, MD/FEP was applied prospectively to optimize three nonpurine fragments, and predictions for 12 compounds were evaluated experimentally. The direction of the change in binding affinity was correctly predicted in a majority of the cases, and agreement with experiment could be improved with rigorous parameter derivation. The results suggest that MD/FEP will become a powerful tool in structure-driven optimization of fragments to lead candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5526870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55268702017-08-02 Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site Matricon, Pierre Ranganathan, Anirudh Warnick, Eugene Gao, Zhan-Guo Rudling, Axel Lambertucci, Catia Marucci, Gabriella Ezzati, Aitakin Jaiteh, Mariama Dal Ben, Diego Jacobson, Kenneth A. Carlsson, Jens Sci Rep Article Fragment-based lead discovery is becoming an increasingly popular strategy for drug discovery. Fragment screening identifies weakly binding compounds that require optimization to become high-affinity leads. As design of leads from fragments is challenging, reliable computational methods to guide optimization would be invaluable. We evaluated using molecular dynamics simulations and the free energy perturbation method (MD/FEP) in fragment optimization for the A(2A) adenosine receptor, a pharmaceutically relevant G protein-coupled receptor. Optimization of fragments exploring two binding site subpockets was probed by calculating relative binding affinities for 23 adenine derivatives, resulting in strong agreement with experimental data (R(2) = 0.78). The predictive power of MD/FEP was significantly better than that of an empirical scoring function. We also demonstrated the potential of the MD/FEP to assess multiple binding modes and to tailor the thermodynamic profile of ligands during optimization. Finally, MD/FEP was applied prospectively to optimize three nonpurine fragments, and predictions for 12 compounds were evaluated experimentally. The direction of the change in binding affinity was correctly predicted in a majority of the cases, and agreement with experiment could be improved with rigorous parameter derivation. The results suggest that MD/FEP will become a powerful tool in structure-driven optimization of fragments to lead candidates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5526870/ /pubmed/28743961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04905-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Matricon, Pierre Ranganathan, Anirudh Warnick, Eugene Gao, Zhan-Guo Rudling, Axel Lambertucci, Catia Marucci, Gabriella Ezzati, Aitakin Jaiteh, Mariama Dal Ben, Diego Jacobson, Kenneth A. Carlsson, Jens Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title | Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title_full | Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title_fullStr | Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title_full_unstemmed | Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title_short | Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A(2A) adenosine receptor binding site |
title_sort | fragment optimization for gpcrs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: probing druggable subpockets of the a(2a) adenosine receptor binding site |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28743961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04905-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matriconpierre fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT ranganathananirudh fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT warnickeugene fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT gaozhanguo fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT rudlingaxel fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT lambertuccicatia fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT maruccigabriella fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT ezzatiaitakin fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT jaitehmariama fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT dalbendiego fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT jacobsonkennetha fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite AT carlssonjens fragmentoptimizationforgpcrsbymoleculardynamicsfreeenergycalculationsprobingdruggablesubpocketsofthea2aadenosinereceptorbindingsite |