Cargando…

In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different sealers including GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex on L929 murine fibroblasts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Samples of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex were fab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saygili, Gokhan, Saygili, Suna, Tuglu, Ibrahim, Davut Capar, Ismail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808465
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i3.15415
_version_ 1783252934596755456
author Saygili, Gokhan
Saygili, Suna
Tuglu, Ibrahim
Davut Capar, Ismail
author_facet Saygili, Gokhan
Saygili, Suna
Tuglu, Ibrahim
Davut Capar, Ismail
author_sort Saygili, Gokhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different sealers including GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex on L929 murine fibroblasts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Samples of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex were fabricated in Teflon disks of 5 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness. L929 fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts of these materials for 3, 24, 72 and 168 h at 37(°)C with 5% CO(2). Cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Apoptosis was evaluated by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The data were analysed by ANOVA. RESULTS: GuttaFlow Bioseal was nontoxic at all experimental time points (P>0.05), whereas MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus were toxic (P<0.001). At 7 days, there were more viable cells in the GuttaFlow 2 group than in the control group, and MTA Fillapex was more cytotoxic than AH-Plus. There were more apoptotic cells in the MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus groups than in the other groups at 3 h (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: GuttaFlow sealers are less cytotoxic than MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus. At all experimental time points, there was no significant difference in the cell viability between the GuttaFlow Bioseal group and the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5527214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55272142017-08-14 In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex Saygili, Gokhan Saygili, Suna Tuglu, Ibrahim Davut Capar, Ismail Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different sealers including GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex on L929 murine fibroblasts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Samples of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex were fabricated in Teflon disks of 5 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness. L929 fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts of these materials for 3, 24, 72 and 168 h at 37(°)C with 5% CO(2). Cell viability was evaluated by the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Apoptosis was evaluated by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The data were analysed by ANOVA. RESULTS: GuttaFlow Bioseal was nontoxic at all experimental time points (P>0.05), whereas MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus were toxic (P<0.001). At 7 days, there were more viable cells in the GuttaFlow 2 group than in the control group, and MTA Fillapex was more cytotoxic than AH-Plus. There were more apoptotic cells in the MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus groups than in the other groups at 3 h (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: GuttaFlow sealers are less cytotoxic than MTA Fillapex and AH-Plus. At all experimental time points, there was no significant difference in the cell viability between the GuttaFlow Bioseal group and the control group. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5527214/ /pubmed/28808465 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i3.15415 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saygili, Gokhan
Saygili, Suna
Tuglu, Ibrahim
Davut Capar, Ismail
In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title_full In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title_fullStr In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title_short In Vitro Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow 2, AH-Plus and MTA Fillapex
title_sort in vitro cytotoxicity of guttaflow bioseal, guttaflow 2, ah-plus and mta fillapex
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808465
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i3.15415
work_keys_str_mv AT saygiligokhan invitrocytotoxicityofguttaflowbiosealguttaflow2ahplusandmtafillapex
AT saygilisuna invitrocytotoxicityofguttaflowbiosealguttaflow2ahplusandmtafillapex
AT tugluibrahim invitrocytotoxicityofguttaflowbiosealguttaflow2ahplusandmtafillapex
AT davutcaparismail invitrocytotoxicityofguttaflowbiosealguttaflow2ahplusandmtafillapex