Cargando…
Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience
Tumour budding in colorectal cancer is an important prognostic factor. A recent consensus conference elaborated recommendations and key issues for future studies, among those the use of pan‐cytokeratin stains, especially in stage II patients. We report the first prospective diagnostic experience usi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.73 |
_version_ | 1783252949871362048 |
---|---|
author | Koelzer, Viktor H Assarzadegan, Naziheh Dawson, Heather Mitrovic, Bojana Grin, Andrea Messenger, David E Kirsch, Richard Riddell, Robert H Lugli, Alessandro Zlobec, Inti |
author_facet | Koelzer, Viktor H Assarzadegan, Naziheh Dawson, Heather Mitrovic, Bojana Grin, Andrea Messenger, David E Kirsch, Richard Riddell, Robert H Lugli, Alessandro Zlobec, Inti |
author_sort | Koelzer, Viktor H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumour budding in colorectal cancer is an important prognostic factor. A recent consensus conference elaborated recommendations and key issues for future studies, among those the use of pan‐cytokeratin stains, especially in stage II patients. We report the first prospective diagnostic experience using pan‐cytokeratin for tumour budding assessment. Moreover, we evaluate tumour budding using pan‐cytokeratin stains and disease‐free survival (DFS) in stage II patients. To this end, tumour budding on pan‐cytokeratin‐stained sections was evaluated by counting the number of tumour buds in 10 high‐power fields (0.238 mm(2)), then categorizing counts as low/high‐grade at a cut‐off of 10 buds, in two cohorts. Cohort 1: prospective setting with 236 unselected primary resected colorectal cancers analysed by 17 pathologists during diagnostic routine. Cohort 2: retrospective cohort of 150 stage II patients with information on DFS. In prospective analysis of cohort 1, tumour budding counts correlated with advanced pT, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion (all p < 0.0001), and distant metastasis (p = 0.0128). In cohort 2, tumour budding was an independent predictor of worse DFS using counts [p = 0.037, HR (95% CI): 1.007 (1.0–1.014)] and the low‐grade/high‐grade scoring approach [p = 0.02; HR (95% CI): 3.04 (1.2–7.77), 90.7 versus 73%, respectively]. In conclusion, tumour budding assessed on pan‐cytokeratin slides is feasible in a large pathology institute and leads to expected associations with clinicopathological features. Additionally, it is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in stage II patients and should be considered for risk stratification in future clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5527316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55273162017-08-02 Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience Koelzer, Viktor H Assarzadegan, Naziheh Dawson, Heather Mitrovic, Bojana Grin, Andrea Messenger, David E Kirsch, Richard Riddell, Robert H Lugli, Alessandro Zlobec, Inti J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles Tumour budding in colorectal cancer is an important prognostic factor. A recent consensus conference elaborated recommendations and key issues for future studies, among those the use of pan‐cytokeratin stains, especially in stage II patients. We report the first prospective diagnostic experience using pan‐cytokeratin for tumour budding assessment. Moreover, we evaluate tumour budding using pan‐cytokeratin stains and disease‐free survival (DFS) in stage II patients. To this end, tumour budding on pan‐cytokeratin‐stained sections was evaluated by counting the number of tumour buds in 10 high‐power fields (0.238 mm(2)), then categorizing counts as low/high‐grade at a cut‐off of 10 buds, in two cohorts. Cohort 1: prospective setting with 236 unselected primary resected colorectal cancers analysed by 17 pathologists during diagnostic routine. Cohort 2: retrospective cohort of 150 stage II patients with information on DFS. In prospective analysis of cohort 1, tumour budding counts correlated with advanced pT, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion (all p < 0.0001), and distant metastasis (p = 0.0128). In cohort 2, tumour budding was an independent predictor of worse DFS using counts [p = 0.037, HR (95% CI): 1.007 (1.0–1.014)] and the low‐grade/high‐grade scoring approach [p = 0.02; HR (95% CI): 3.04 (1.2–7.77), 90.7 versus 73%, respectively]. In conclusion, tumour budding assessed on pan‐cytokeratin slides is feasible in a large pathology institute and leads to expected associations with clinicopathological features. Additionally, it is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in stage II patients and should be considered for risk stratification in future clinical studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5527316/ /pubmed/28770101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.73 Text en © 2017 The Authors The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Koelzer, Viktor H Assarzadegan, Naziheh Dawson, Heather Mitrovic, Bojana Grin, Andrea Messenger, David E Kirsch, Richard Riddell, Robert H Lugli, Alessandro Zlobec, Inti Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title | Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title_full | Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title_fullStr | Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title_short | Cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
title_sort | cytokeratin‐based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage ii patients and prospective diagnostic experience |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.73 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koelzerviktorh cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT assarzadegannaziheh cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT dawsonheather cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT mitrovicbojana cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT grinandrea cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT messengerdavide cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT kirschrichard cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT riddellroberth cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT luglialessandro cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience AT zlobecinti cytokeratinbasedassessmentoftumourbuddingincolorectalcanceranalysisinstageiipatientsandprospectivediagnosticexperience |