Cargando…

The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Assessments of vaccine efficacy and safety capture only the minimum information needed for regulatory approval, rather than the full public health value of vaccines. Vaccine efficacy provides a measure of proportionate disease reduction, is usually limited to etiologically confirmed dise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilder-Smith, A., Longini, I., Zuber, P. L., Bärnighausen, T., Edmunds, W. J., Dean, N., Spicher, V. Masserey, Benissa, M. R., Gessner, B. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28743299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0911-8
_version_ 1783252962638823424
author Wilder-Smith, A.
Longini, I.
Zuber, P. L.
Bärnighausen, T.
Edmunds, W. J.
Dean, N.
Spicher, V. Masserey
Benissa, M. R.
Gessner, B. D.
author_facet Wilder-Smith, A.
Longini, I.
Zuber, P. L.
Bärnighausen, T.
Edmunds, W. J.
Dean, N.
Spicher, V. Masserey
Benissa, M. R.
Gessner, B. D.
author_sort Wilder-Smith, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessments of vaccine efficacy and safety capture only the minimum information needed for regulatory approval, rather than the full public health value of vaccines. Vaccine efficacy provides a measure of proportionate disease reduction, is usually limited to etiologically confirmed disease, and focuses on the direct protection of the vaccinated individual. Herein, we propose a broader scope of methods, measures and outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness and public health impact to be considered for evidence-informed policymaking in both pre- and post-licensure stages. DISCUSSION: Pre-licensure: Regulatory concerns dictate an individually randomised clinical trial. However, some circumstances (such as the West African Ebola epidemic) may require novel designs that could be considered valid for licensure by regulatory agencies. In addition, protocol-defined analytic plans for these studies should include clinical as well as etiologically confirmed endpoints (e.g. all cause hospitalisations, pneumonias, acute gastroenteritis and others as appropriate to the vaccine target), and should include vaccine-preventable disease incidence and ‘number needed to vaccinate’ as outcomes. Post-licensure: There is a central role for phase IV cluster randomised clinical trials that allows for estimation of population-level vaccine impact, including indirect, total and overall effects. Dynamic models should be prioritised over static models as the constant force of infection assumed in static models will usually underestimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the immunisation programme by underestimating indirect effects. The economic impact of vaccinations should incorporate health and non-health benefits of vaccination in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, thus allowing for estimation of the net social value of vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The full benefits of vaccination reach beyond direct prevention of etiologically confirmed disease and often extend across the life course of a vaccinated person, prevent outcomes in the wider community, stabilise health systems, promote health equity, and benefit local and national economies. The degree to which vaccinations provide broad public health benefits is stronger than for other preventive and curative interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5527440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55274402017-08-02 The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes Wilder-Smith, A. Longini, I. Zuber, P. L. Bärnighausen, T. Edmunds, W. J. Dean, N. Spicher, V. Masserey Benissa, M. R. Gessner, B. D. BMC Med Opinion BACKGROUND: Assessments of vaccine efficacy and safety capture only the minimum information needed for regulatory approval, rather than the full public health value of vaccines. Vaccine efficacy provides a measure of proportionate disease reduction, is usually limited to etiologically confirmed disease, and focuses on the direct protection of the vaccinated individual. Herein, we propose a broader scope of methods, measures and outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness and public health impact to be considered for evidence-informed policymaking in both pre- and post-licensure stages. DISCUSSION: Pre-licensure: Regulatory concerns dictate an individually randomised clinical trial. However, some circumstances (such as the West African Ebola epidemic) may require novel designs that could be considered valid for licensure by regulatory agencies. In addition, protocol-defined analytic plans for these studies should include clinical as well as etiologically confirmed endpoints (e.g. all cause hospitalisations, pneumonias, acute gastroenteritis and others as appropriate to the vaccine target), and should include vaccine-preventable disease incidence and ‘number needed to vaccinate’ as outcomes. Post-licensure: There is a central role for phase IV cluster randomised clinical trials that allows for estimation of population-level vaccine impact, including indirect, total and overall effects. Dynamic models should be prioritised over static models as the constant force of infection assumed in static models will usually underestimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the immunisation programme by underestimating indirect effects. The economic impact of vaccinations should incorporate health and non-health benefits of vaccination in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, thus allowing for estimation of the net social value of vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The full benefits of vaccination reach beyond direct prevention of etiologically confirmed disease and often extend across the life course of a vaccinated person, prevent outcomes in the wider community, stabilise health systems, promote health equity, and benefit local and national economies. The degree to which vaccinations provide broad public health benefits is stronger than for other preventive and curative interventions. BioMed Central 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5527440/ /pubmed/28743299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0911-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Opinion
Wilder-Smith, A.
Longini, I.
Zuber, P. L.
Bärnighausen, T.
Edmunds, W. J.
Dean, N.
Spicher, V. Masserey
Benissa, M. R.
Gessner, B. D.
The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title_full The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title_fullStr The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title_short The public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
title_sort public health value of vaccines beyond efficacy: methods, measures and outcomes
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28743299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0911-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wildersmitha thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT longinii thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT zuberpl thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT barnighausent thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT edmundswj thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT deann thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT spichervmasserey thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT benissamr thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT gessnerbd thepublichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT wildersmitha publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT longinii publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT zuberpl publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT barnighausent publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT edmundswj publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT deann publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT spichervmasserey publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT benissamr publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes
AT gessnerbd publichealthvalueofvaccinesbeyondefficacymethodsmeasuresandoutcomes