Cargando…

Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods

Many landscape genetic studies aim to determine the effect of landscape on gene flow between populations. These studies frequently employ link‐based methods that relate pairwise measures of historical gene flow to measures of the landscape and the geographical distance between populations. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: van Strien, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5528204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3075
_version_ 1783253022346838016
author van Strien, Maarten J.
author_facet van Strien, Maarten J.
author_sort van Strien, Maarten J.
collection PubMed
description Many landscape genetic studies aim to determine the effect of landscape on gene flow between populations. These studies frequently employ link‐based methods that relate pairwise measures of historical gene flow to measures of the landscape and the geographical distance between populations. However, apart from landscape and distance, there is a third important factor that can influence historical gene flow, that is, population topology (i.e., the arrangement of populations throughout a landscape). As the population topology is determined in part by the landscape configuration, I argue that it should play a more prominent role in landscape genetics. Making use of existing literature and theoretical examples, I discuss how population topology can influence results in landscape genetic studies and how it can be taken into account to improve the accuracy of these results. In support of my arguments, I have performed a literature review of landscape genetic studies published during the first half of 2015 as well as several computer simulations of gene flow between populations. First, I argue why one should carefully consider which population pairs should be included in link‐based analyses. Second, I discuss several ways in which the population topology can be incorporated in response and explanatory variables. Third, I outline why it is important to sample populations in such a way that a good representation of the population topology is obtained. Fourth, I discuss how statistical testing for link‐based approaches could be influenced by the population topology. I conclude the article with six recommendations geared toward better incorporating population topology in link‐based landscape genetic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5528204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55282042017-08-02 Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods van Strien, Maarten J. Ecol Evol Hypotheses Many landscape genetic studies aim to determine the effect of landscape on gene flow between populations. These studies frequently employ link‐based methods that relate pairwise measures of historical gene flow to measures of the landscape and the geographical distance between populations. However, apart from landscape and distance, there is a third important factor that can influence historical gene flow, that is, population topology (i.e., the arrangement of populations throughout a landscape). As the population topology is determined in part by the landscape configuration, I argue that it should play a more prominent role in landscape genetics. Making use of existing literature and theoretical examples, I discuss how population topology can influence results in landscape genetic studies and how it can be taken into account to improve the accuracy of these results. In support of my arguments, I have performed a literature review of landscape genetic studies published during the first half of 2015 as well as several computer simulations of gene flow between populations. First, I argue why one should carefully consider which population pairs should be included in link‐based analyses. Second, I discuss several ways in which the population topology can be incorporated in response and explanatory variables. Third, I outline why it is important to sample populations in such a way that a good representation of the population topology is obtained. Fourth, I discuss how statistical testing for link‐based approaches could be influenced by the population topology. I conclude the article with six recommendations geared toward better incorporating population topology in link‐based landscape genetic studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5528204/ /pubmed/28770047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3075 Text en © 2017 The Author. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypotheses
van Strien, Maarten J.
Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title_full Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title_fullStr Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title_short Consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
title_sort consequences of population topology for studying gene flow using link‐based landscape genetic methods
topic Hypotheses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5528204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3075
work_keys_str_mv AT vanstrienmaartenj consequencesofpopulationtopologyforstudyinggeneflowusinglinkbasedlandscapegeneticmethods