Cargando…
Relative Selection Strength: Quantifying effect size in habitat‐ and step‐selection inference
Habitat‐selection analysis lacks an appropriate measure of the ecological significance of the statistical estimates—a practical interpretation of the magnitude of the selection coefficients. There is a need for a standard approach that allows relating the strength of selection to a change in habitat...
Autores principales: | Avgar, Tal, Lele, Subhash R., Keim, Jonah L., Boyce, Mark S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5528224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3122 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A ‘How to’ guide for interpreting parameters in habitat‐selection analyses
por: Fieberg, John, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Habitat selection patterns are density dependent under the ideal free distribution
por: Avgar, Tal, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses
por: Signer, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Density‐dependent habitat selection alters drivers of population distribution in northern Yellowstone elk
por: Smith, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Woodland caribou habitat selection patterns in relation to predation risk and forage abundance depend on reproductive state
por: Viejou, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2018)