Cargando…

Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?

OBJECTIVES: To define the risk of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the therapeutic value of elective neck dissection (END) in survival of clinically negative neck node (cN0) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with maxillary SCC and cN0 neck...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jung-Hyun, Nam, Woong, Kim, Hyung Jun, Cha, In-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770157
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.166
_version_ 1783253082354745344
author Park, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Woong
Kim, Hyung Jun
Cha, In-Ho
author_facet Park, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Woong
Kim, Hyung Jun
Cha, In-Ho
author_sort Park, Jung-Hyun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To define the risk of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the therapeutic value of elective neck dissection (END) in survival of clinically negative neck node (cN0) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with maxillary SCC and cN0 neck were analyzed retrospectively, including 35 patients with maxillary gingiva and 32 patients with maxillary sinus. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 10 patients (14.9%) had occult cervical metastasis. The incidence of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary gingival SCC was higher than that of maxillary sinus SCC (17.1% and 12.5%, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rate was 51.9% for the END group and 74.0% for the non-END group. The success rate of treatment for regional recurrence was high at 71.4%, whereas that for local or locoregional recurrence was low (33.3% and 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The incidence of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary SCC was not high enough to recommend END. For survival of cN0 patients, local control of the primary tumor is more important than modality of neck management. Observation of cN0 neck is recommended when early detection of regional recurrence is possible irrespective of the site or T stage. The key enabler of early detection is patient education with periodic follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5529190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55291902017-08-02 Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla? Park, Jung-Hyun Nam, Woong Kim, Hyung Jun Cha, In-Ho J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: To define the risk of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the therapeutic value of elective neck dissection (END) in survival of clinically negative neck node (cN0) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with maxillary SCC and cN0 neck were analyzed retrospectively, including 35 patients with maxillary gingiva and 32 patients with maxillary sinus. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 10 patients (14.9%) had occult cervical metastasis. The incidence of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary gingival SCC was higher than that of maxillary sinus SCC (17.1% and 12.5%, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rate was 51.9% for the END group and 74.0% for the non-END group. The success rate of treatment for regional recurrence was high at 71.4%, whereas that for local or locoregional recurrence was low (33.3% and 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The incidence of occult cervical metastasis of maxillary SCC was not high enough to recommend END. For survival of cN0 patients, local control of the primary tumor is more important than modality of neck management. Observation of cN0 neck is recommended when early detection of regional recurrence is possible irrespective of the site or T stage. The key enabler of early detection is patient education with periodic follow-up. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017-06 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5529190/ /pubmed/28770157 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.166 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jung-Hyun
Nam, Woong
Kim, Hyung Jun
Cha, In-Ho
Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title_full Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title_fullStr Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title_full_unstemmed Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title_short Is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
title_sort is elective neck dissection needed in squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28770157
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.166
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjunghyun iselectiveneckdissectionneededinsquamouscellcarcinomaofmaxilla
AT namwoong iselectiveneckdissectionneededinsquamouscellcarcinomaofmaxilla
AT kimhyungjun iselectiveneckdissectionneededinsquamouscellcarcinomaofmaxilla
AT chainho iselectiveneckdissectionneededinsquamouscellcarcinomaofmaxilla