Cargando…

Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh

BACKGROUND: The augmentation of the jaw has been and continues to be a sophisticated therapy in implantology. Modern CAD-CAM technologies lead to revival of old and established augmentation techniques such as the use of titanium mesh (TM) for bone augmentation. The aim of this retrospective study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagheb, K., Schiegnitz, E., Moergel, M., Walter, C., Al-Nawas, B., Wagner, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0097-z
_version_ 1783253093090066432
author Sagheb, K.
Schiegnitz, E.
Moergel, M.
Walter, C.
Al-Nawas, B.
Wagner, W.
author_facet Sagheb, K.
Schiegnitz, E.
Moergel, M.
Walter, C.
Al-Nawas, B.
Wagner, W.
author_sort Sagheb, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The augmentation of the jaw has been and continues to be a sophisticated therapy in implantology. Modern CAD-CAM technologies lead to revival of old and established augmentation techniques such as the use of titanium mesh (TM) for bone augmentation. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM based on the CT/DVT-DICOM data of the patients for the first time. METHODS: In 17 patients, 21 different regions were augmented with an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM (Yxoss CBR®, Filderstadt, Germany). For the augmentation, a mixture of autologous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or autologous bone alone was used. Reentry with explantation of the TM and simultaneous implantation of 44 implants were performed after 6 months. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative cone beam computed tomographies (CBCT) were performed to measure the gained bone height. RESULTS: The success rate for the bone grafting procedure was 100%. Thirty-three percent of cases presented an exposure of the TM during the healing period. However, premature removal of these exposed meshes was not necessary. Exposure rate in augmentations performed with mid-crestal incisions was higher than in augmentations performed with a modified poncho incision (45.5 vs. 20%, p = 0.221). In addition, exposure rates in the maxilla were significantly higher than in the mandible (66.7 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.009). Gender, smoking, periodontal disease, gingiva type, used augmentation material, and used membrane had no significant influence on the exposure rate (p > 0.05). The mean vertical augmentation was 6.5 ± 1.7 mm, and the mean horizontal augmentation was 5.5 ± 1.9 mm. Implant survival rate after a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months after reentry was 100%. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the retrospective character of this study, this study shows for the first time that individualized CAD-CAM TM provide a sufficient and safe augmentation technique, especially for vertical and combined defects. However, the soft tissue handling for sufficient mesh covering remains one of the most critical steps using this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5529307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55293072017-08-10 Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh Sagheb, K. Schiegnitz, E. Moergel, M. Walter, C. Al-Nawas, B. Wagner, W. Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The augmentation of the jaw has been and continues to be a sophisticated therapy in implantology. Modern CAD-CAM technologies lead to revival of old and established augmentation techniques such as the use of titanium mesh (TM) for bone augmentation. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM based on the CT/DVT-DICOM data of the patients for the first time. METHODS: In 17 patients, 21 different regions were augmented with an individualized CAD-CAM-produced TM (Yxoss CBR®, Filderstadt, Germany). For the augmentation, a mixture of autologous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or autologous bone alone was used. Reentry with explantation of the TM and simultaneous implantation of 44 implants were performed after 6 months. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative cone beam computed tomographies (CBCT) were performed to measure the gained bone height. RESULTS: The success rate for the bone grafting procedure was 100%. Thirty-three percent of cases presented an exposure of the TM during the healing period. However, premature removal of these exposed meshes was not necessary. Exposure rate in augmentations performed with mid-crestal incisions was higher than in augmentations performed with a modified poncho incision (45.5 vs. 20%, p = 0.221). In addition, exposure rates in the maxilla were significantly higher than in the mandible (66.7 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.009). Gender, smoking, periodontal disease, gingiva type, used augmentation material, and used membrane had no significant influence on the exposure rate (p > 0.05). The mean vertical augmentation was 6.5 ± 1.7 mm, and the mean horizontal augmentation was 5.5 ± 1.9 mm. Implant survival rate after a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months after reentry was 100%. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the retrospective character of this study, this study shows for the first time that individualized CAD-CAM TM provide a sufficient and safe augmentation technique, especially for vertical and combined defects. However, the soft tissue handling for sufficient mesh covering remains one of the most critical steps using this technique. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5529307/ /pubmed/28748521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0097-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Sagheb, K.
Schiegnitz, E.
Moergel, M.
Walter, C.
Al-Nawas, B.
Wagner, W.
Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title_full Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title_fullStr Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title_short Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh
title_sort clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized cad-cam-produced titanium mesh
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28748521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0097-z
work_keys_str_mv AT saghebk clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh
AT schiegnitze clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh
AT moergelm clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh
AT walterc clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh
AT alnawasb clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh
AT wagnerw clinicaloutcomeofalveolarridgeaugmentationwithindividualizedcadcamproducedtitaniummesh