Cargando…

Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection

Readers with dyslexia are purported to have a selective visual impairment but the underlying nature of the deficit remains elusive. Here, we used a combination of behavioural psychophysics and biologically-motivated computational modeling to investigate if this deficit extends to object segmentation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnston, Richard, Pitchford, Nicola J., Roach, Neil W., Ledgeway, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06967-6
_version_ 1783253156524720128
author Johnston, Richard
Pitchford, Nicola J.
Roach, Neil W.
Ledgeway, Timothy
author_facet Johnston, Richard
Pitchford, Nicola J.
Roach, Neil W.
Ledgeway, Timothy
author_sort Johnston, Richard
collection PubMed
description Readers with dyslexia are purported to have a selective visual impairment but the underlying nature of the deficit remains elusive. Here, we used a combination of behavioural psychophysics and biologically-motivated computational modeling to investigate if this deficit extends to object segmentation, a process implicated in visual word form recognition. Thirty-eight adults with a wide range of reading abilities were shown random-dot displays spatially divided into horizontal segments. Adjacent segments contained either local motion signals in opposing directions or analogous static form cues depicting orthogonal orientations. Participants had to discriminate these segmented patterns from stimuli containing identical motion or form cues that were spatially intermingled. Results showed participants were unable to perform the motion or form task reliably when segment size was smaller than a spatial resolution (acuity) limit that was independent of reading skill. Coherence thresholds decreased as segment size increased, but for the motion task the rate of improvement was shallower for readers with dyslexia and the segment size where performance became asymptotic was larger. This suggests that segmentation is impaired in readers with dyslexia but only on tasks containing motion information. We interpret these findings within a novel framework in which the mechanisms underlying scale selection are impaired in developmental dyslexia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5529585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55295852017-08-02 Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection Johnston, Richard Pitchford, Nicola J. Roach, Neil W. Ledgeway, Timothy Sci Rep Article Readers with dyslexia are purported to have a selective visual impairment but the underlying nature of the deficit remains elusive. Here, we used a combination of behavioural psychophysics and biologically-motivated computational modeling to investigate if this deficit extends to object segmentation, a process implicated in visual word form recognition. Thirty-eight adults with a wide range of reading abilities were shown random-dot displays spatially divided into horizontal segments. Adjacent segments contained either local motion signals in opposing directions or analogous static form cues depicting orthogonal orientations. Participants had to discriminate these segmented patterns from stimuli containing identical motion or form cues that were spatially intermingled. Results showed participants were unable to perform the motion or form task reliably when segment size was smaller than a spatial resolution (acuity) limit that was independent of reading skill. Coherence thresholds decreased as segment size increased, but for the motion task the rate of improvement was shallower for readers with dyslexia and the segment size where performance became asymptotic was larger. This suggests that segmentation is impaired in readers with dyslexia but only on tasks containing motion information. We interpret these findings within a novel framework in which the mechanisms underlying scale selection are impaired in developmental dyslexia. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5529585/ /pubmed/28747794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06967-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Johnston, Richard
Pitchford, Nicola J.
Roach, Neil W.
Ledgeway, Timothy
Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title_full Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title_fullStr Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title_full_unstemmed Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title_short Visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
title_sort visual perception in dyslexia is limited by sub-optimal scale selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06967-6
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonrichard visualperceptionindyslexiaislimitedbysuboptimalscaleselection
AT pitchfordnicolaj visualperceptionindyslexiaislimitedbysuboptimalscaleselection
AT roachneilw visualperceptionindyslexiaislimitedbysuboptimalscaleselection
AT ledgewaytimothy visualperceptionindyslexiaislimitedbysuboptimalscaleselection