Cargando…

Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?

In the last 15 years, it emerged that the practice of regular physical activity reduces the risks of many diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, etc.) and it is fundamental in weight control and energy consuming to contrast obesity. Different groups proposed many molecular mechanisms as respon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceccarelli, Gabriele, Benedetti, Laura, Arcari, Maria Luisa, Carubbi, Cecilia, Galli, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0022
_version_ 1783253196598149120
author Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Benedetti, Laura
Arcari, Maria Luisa
Carubbi, Cecilia
Galli, Daniela
author_facet Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Benedetti, Laura
Arcari, Maria Luisa
Carubbi, Cecilia
Galli, Daniela
author_sort Ceccarelli, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description In the last 15 years, it emerged that the practice of regular physical activity reduces the risks of many diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, etc.) and it is fundamental in weight control and energy consuming to contrast obesity. Different groups proposed many molecular mechanisms as responsible for the positive effects of physical activity in healthy life. However, many points remain to be clarified. In this mini-review we reported the latest observations on the effects of physical exercise on healthy skeletal and cardiac muscle focusing on muscle stem cells. The last ones represent the fundamental elements for muscle regeneration post injury, but also for healthy muscle homeostasis. Interestingly, in both muscle tissues the morphological consequence of physical activity is a physiological hypertrophy that depends on different phenomena both in differentiated cells and stem cells. The signaling pathways for physical exercise effects present common elements in skeletal and cardiac muscle, like activation of specific transcription factors, proliferative pathways, and cytokines. More recently, post translational (miRNAs) or epigenetic (DNA methylation) modifications have been demonstrated. However, several points remain unresolved thus requiring new research on the effect of exercise on muscle stem cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5529938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55299382017-08-01 Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at? Ceccarelli, Gabriele Benedetti, Laura Arcari, Maria Luisa Carubbi, Cecilia Galli, Daniela Open Med (Wars) Regular Articles In the last 15 years, it emerged that the practice of regular physical activity reduces the risks of many diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, etc.) and it is fundamental in weight control and energy consuming to contrast obesity. Different groups proposed many molecular mechanisms as responsible for the positive effects of physical activity in healthy life. However, many points remain to be clarified. In this mini-review we reported the latest observations on the effects of physical exercise on healthy skeletal and cardiac muscle focusing on muscle stem cells. The last ones represent the fundamental elements for muscle regeneration post injury, but also for healthy muscle homeostasis. Interestingly, in both muscle tissues the morphological consequence of physical activity is a physiological hypertrophy that depends on different phenomena both in differentiated cells and stem cells. The signaling pathways for physical exercise effects present common elements in skeletal and cardiac muscle, like activation of specific transcription factors, proliferative pathways, and cytokines. More recently, post translational (miRNAs) or epigenetic (DNA methylation) modifications have been demonstrated. However, several points remain unresolved thus requiring new research on the effect of exercise on muscle stem cells. De Gruyter Open 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5529938/ /pubmed/28765836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0022 Text en © 2017 Gabriele Ceccarelli et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Ceccarelli, Gabriele
Benedetti, Laura
Arcari, Maria Luisa
Carubbi, Cecilia
Galli, Daniela
Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title_full Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title_fullStr Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title_full_unstemmed Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title_short Muscle Stem Cell and Physical Activity: What Point is the Debate at?
title_sort muscle stem cell and physical activity: what point is the debate at?
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5529938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0022
work_keys_str_mv AT ceccarelligabriele musclestemcellandphysicalactivitywhatpointisthedebateat
AT benedettilaura musclestemcellandphysicalactivitywhatpointisthedebateat
AT arcarimarialuisa musclestemcellandphysicalactivitywhatpointisthedebateat
AT carubbicecilia musclestemcellandphysicalactivitywhatpointisthedebateat
AT gallidaniela musclestemcellandphysicalactivitywhatpointisthedebateat