Cargando…
A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831 |
_version_ | 1783253248785776640 |
---|---|
author | Smolen, Josef S Agarwal, Sandeep K Ilivanova, Elena Xu, Xie Lillian Miao, Ye Zhuang, Yanli Nnane, Ivo Radziszewski, Waldemar Greenspan, Andrew Beutler, Anna Baker, Daniel |
author_facet | Smolen, Josef S Agarwal, Sandeep K Ilivanova, Elena Xu, Xie Lillian Miao, Ye Zhuang, Yanli Nnane, Ivo Radziszewski, Waldemar Greenspan, Andrew Beutler, Anna Baker, Daniel |
author_sort | Smolen, Josef S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48. RESULTS: At week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01645280. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5530337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55303372017-07-31 A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate Smolen, Josef S Agarwal, Sandeep K Ilivanova, Elena Xu, Xie Lillian Miao, Ye Zhuang, Yanli Nnane, Ivo Radziszewski, Waldemar Greenspan, Andrew Beutler, Anna Baker, Daniel Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48. RESULTS: At week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01645280. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5530337/ /pubmed/28087506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Epidemiological Research Smolen, Josef S Agarwal, Sandeep K Ilivanova, Elena Xu, Xie Lillian Miao, Ye Zhuang, Yanli Nnane, Ivo Radziszewski, Waldemar Greenspan, Andrew Beutler, Anna Baker, Daniel A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title | A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title_full | A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title_fullStr | A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title_short | A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
title_sort | randomised phase ii study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate |
topic | Clinical and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smolenjosefs arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT agarwalsandeepk arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT ilivanovaelena arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT xuxielillian arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT miaoye arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT zhuangyanli arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT nnaneivo arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT radziszewskiwaldemar arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT greenspanandrew arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT beutleranna arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT bakerdaniel arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT smolenjosefs randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT agarwalsandeepk randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT ilivanovaelena randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT xuxielillian randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT miaoye randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT zhuangyanli randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT nnaneivo randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT radziszewskiwaldemar randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT greenspanandrew randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT beutleranna randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate AT bakerdaniel randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate |