Cargando…

A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smolen, Josef S, Agarwal, Sandeep K, Ilivanova, Elena, Xu, Xie Lillian, Miao, Ye, Zhuang, Yanli, Nnane, Ivo, Radziszewski, Waldemar, Greenspan, Andrew, Beutler, Anna, Baker, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831
_version_ 1783253248785776640
author Smolen, Josef S
Agarwal, Sandeep K
Ilivanova, Elena
Xu, Xie Lillian
Miao, Ye
Zhuang, Yanli
Nnane, Ivo
Radziszewski, Waldemar
Greenspan, Andrew
Beutler, Anna
Baker, Daniel
author_facet Smolen, Josef S
Agarwal, Sandeep K
Ilivanova, Elena
Xu, Xie Lillian
Miao, Ye
Zhuang, Yanli
Nnane, Ivo
Radziszewski, Waldemar
Greenspan, Andrew
Beutler, Anna
Baker, Daniel
author_sort Smolen, Josef S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48. RESULTS: At week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01645280.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5530337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55303372017-07-31 A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate Smolen, Josef S Agarwal, Sandeep K Ilivanova, Elena Xu, Xie Lillian Miao, Ye Zhuang, Yanli Nnane, Ivo Radziszewski, Waldemar Greenspan, Andrew Beutler, Anna Baker, Daniel Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVE: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48. RESULTS: At week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01645280. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2017-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5530337/ /pubmed/28087506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Smolen, Josef S
Agarwal, Sandeep K
Ilivanova, Elena
Xu, Xie Lillian
Miao, Ye
Zhuang, Yanli
Nnane, Ivo
Radziszewski, Waldemar
Greenspan, Andrew
Beutler, Anna
Baker, Daniel
A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title_full A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title_fullStr A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title_full_unstemmed A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title_short A randomised phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
title_sort randomised phase ii study evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered ustekinumab and guselkumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28087506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209831
work_keys_str_mv AT smolenjosefs arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT agarwalsandeepk arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT ilivanovaelena arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT xuxielillian arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT miaoye arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT zhuangyanli arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT nnaneivo arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT radziszewskiwaldemar arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT greenspanandrew arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT beutleranna arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT bakerdaniel arandomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT smolenjosefs randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT agarwalsandeepk randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT ilivanovaelena randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT xuxielillian randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT miaoye randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT zhuangyanli randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT nnaneivo randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT radziszewskiwaldemar randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT greenspanandrew randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT beutleranna randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate
AT bakerdaniel randomisedphaseiistudyevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyofsubcutaneouslyadministeredustekinumabandguselkumabinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritisdespitetreatmentwithmethotrexate