Cargando…

Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using air exclusively as the gas tamponade. METHODS: This retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series involved reviewing medical records of patients that underwent vitrectomy and gas tamponade for R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pak, Kang Yeun, Lee, Seok Jae, Kwon, Han Jo, Park, Sung Who, Byon, Ik Soo, Lee, Ji Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1341948
_version_ 1783253254643122176
author Pak, Kang Yeun
Lee, Seok Jae
Kwon, Han Jo
Park, Sung Who
Byon, Ik Soo
Lee, Ji Eun
author_facet Pak, Kang Yeun
Lee, Seok Jae
Kwon, Han Jo
Park, Sung Who
Byon, Ik Soo
Lee, Ji Eun
author_sort Pak, Kang Yeun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using air exclusively as the gas tamponade. METHODS: This retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series involved reviewing medical records of patients that underwent vitrectomy and gas tamponade for RRD between January 2013 and December 2015. Patients whose eyes were treated exclusively with air tamponade since July 2014 were assigned to the air group, while those treated with heterogeneous gas agents before June 2014 were assigned to the control group. The primary outcome was the primary reattachment rate. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and duration to detect redetachments were assigned as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The air group and the control group included 71 and 72 eyes, respectively. The primary reattachment rate was 94.4% in the air group and there was no significant difference with 94.4% in the control group (p = 0.951). BCVA was significantly better in the air group at 1 month (p = 0.021) but not at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.561). Redetachments were recognized earlier in the air group (9.3 ± 0.5 days) compared with those in the control group (21.3 ± 7.4 days) (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of simple RRD with sufficient removal of subretinal fluid, air could be considered for use as gas tamponade. This trial is registered with KCT0002358.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5530412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55304122017-08-07 Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Pak, Kang Yeun Lee, Seok Jae Kwon, Han Jo Park, Sung Who Byon, Ik Soo Lee, Ji Eun J Ophthalmol Clinical Study PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using air exclusively as the gas tamponade. METHODS: This retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series involved reviewing medical records of patients that underwent vitrectomy and gas tamponade for RRD between January 2013 and December 2015. Patients whose eyes were treated exclusively with air tamponade since July 2014 were assigned to the air group, while those treated with heterogeneous gas agents before June 2014 were assigned to the control group. The primary outcome was the primary reattachment rate. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and duration to detect redetachments were assigned as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The air group and the control group included 71 and 72 eyes, respectively. The primary reattachment rate was 94.4% in the air group and there was no significant difference with 94.4% in the control group (p = 0.951). BCVA was significantly better in the air group at 1 month (p = 0.021) but not at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.561). Redetachments were recognized earlier in the air group (9.3 ± 0.5 days) compared with those in the control group (21.3 ± 7.4 days) (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of simple RRD with sufficient removal of subretinal fluid, air could be considered for use as gas tamponade. This trial is registered with KCT0002358. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5530412/ /pubmed/28785481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1341948 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kang Yeun Pak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pak, Kang Yeun
Lee, Seok Jae
Kwon, Han Jo
Park, Sung Who
Byon, Ik Soo
Lee, Ji Eun
Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_full Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_fullStr Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_full_unstemmed Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_short Exclusive Use of Air as Gas Tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_sort exclusive use of air as gas tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1341948
work_keys_str_mv AT pakkangyeun exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT leeseokjae exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT kwonhanjo exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT parksungwho exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT byoniksoo exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT leejieun exclusiveuseofairasgastamponadeinrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment