Cargando…

Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Palma, Rodney, Sörensson, Peder, Verouhis, Dinos, Pernow, John, Saleh, Nawzad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1
_version_ 1783253331126255616
author De Palma, Rodney
Sörensson, Peder
Verouhis, Dinos
Pernow, John
Saleh, Nawzad
author_facet De Palma, Rodney
Sörensson, Peder
Verouhis, Dinos
Pernow, John
Saleh, Nawzad
author_sort De Palma, Rodney
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for assessing MaR. Evidence of its utility compared to traditional assessment methods and as a surrogate for clinical outcome is needed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis within a study evaluating post-conditioning during ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with coronary intervention (n = 78). CE-SSFP post-infarction was compared with angiographic jeopardy methods. Differences and variability between CMR and angiographic methods using Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared to MaR and extent of infarction. RESULTS: MaR showed correlation between CE-SSFP, and both BARI and APPROACH scores of 0.83 (p < 0.0001) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. Bias between CE-SSFP and BARI was 1.1% (agreement limits -11.4 to +9.1). Bias between CE-SSFP and APPROACH was 1.2% (agreement limits -13 to +10.5). Inter-observer variability for the BARI score was 0.56 ± 2.9; 0.42 ± 2.1 for the APPROACH score; -1.4 ± 3.1% for CE-SSFP. Intra-observer variability was 0.15 ± 1.85 for the BARI score; for the APPROACH score 0.19 ± 1.6; and for CE-SSFP -0.58 ± 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Quantification of MaR with CE-SSFP imaging following STEMI shows high correlation and low bias compared with angiographic scoring and supports its use as a reliable and practical method to determine myocardial salvage in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration information for the parent clinical trial: Karolinska Clinical Trial Registration (2008) Unique identifier: CT20080014. Registered 04(th) January 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5530997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55309972017-08-02 Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores De Palma, Rodney Sörensson, Peder Verouhis, Dinos Pernow, John Saleh, Nawzad J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for assessing MaR. Evidence of its utility compared to traditional assessment methods and as a surrogate for clinical outcome is needed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis within a study evaluating post-conditioning during ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with coronary intervention (n = 78). CE-SSFP post-infarction was compared with angiographic jeopardy methods. Differences and variability between CMR and angiographic methods using Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared to MaR and extent of infarction. RESULTS: MaR showed correlation between CE-SSFP, and both BARI and APPROACH scores of 0.83 (p < 0.0001) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. Bias between CE-SSFP and BARI was 1.1% (agreement limits -11.4 to +9.1). Bias between CE-SSFP and APPROACH was 1.2% (agreement limits -13 to +10.5). Inter-observer variability for the BARI score was 0.56 ± 2.9; 0.42 ± 2.1 for the APPROACH score; -1.4 ± 3.1% for CE-SSFP. Intra-observer variability was 0.15 ± 1.85 for the BARI score; for the APPROACH score 0.19 ± 1.6; and for CE-SSFP -0.58 ± 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Quantification of MaR with CE-SSFP imaging following STEMI shows high correlation and low bias compared with angiographic scoring and supports its use as a reliable and practical method to determine myocardial salvage in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration information for the parent clinical trial: Karolinska Clinical Trial Registration (2008) Unique identifier: CT20080014. Registered 04(th) January 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5530997/ /pubmed/28750637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
De Palma, Rodney
Sörensson, Peder
Verouhis, Dinos
Pernow, John
Saleh, Nawzad
Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title_full Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title_fullStr Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title_short Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
title_sort quantification of myocardium at risk in st- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1
work_keys_str_mv AT depalmarodney quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores
AT sorenssonpeder quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores
AT verouhisdinos quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores
AT pernowjohn quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores
AT salehnawzad quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores