Cargando…
Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1 |
_version_ | 1783253331126255616 |
---|---|
author | De Palma, Rodney Sörensson, Peder Verouhis, Dinos Pernow, John Saleh, Nawzad |
author_facet | De Palma, Rodney Sörensson, Peder Verouhis, Dinos Pernow, John Saleh, Nawzad |
author_sort | De Palma, Rodney |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for assessing MaR. Evidence of its utility compared to traditional assessment methods and as a surrogate for clinical outcome is needed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis within a study evaluating post-conditioning during ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with coronary intervention (n = 78). CE-SSFP post-infarction was compared with angiographic jeopardy methods. Differences and variability between CMR and angiographic methods using Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared to MaR and extent of infarction. RESULTS: MaR showed correlation between CE-SSFP, and both BARI and APPROACH scores of 0.83 (p < 0.0001) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. Bias between CE-SSFP and BARI was 1.1% (agreement limits -11.4 to +9.1). Bias between CE-SSFP and APPROACH was 1.2% (agreement limits -13 to +10.5). Inter-observer variability for the BARI score was 0.56 ± 2.9; 0.42 ± 2.1 for the APPROACH score; -1.4 ± 3.1% for CE-SSFP. Intra-observer variability was 0.15 ± 1.85 for the BARI score; for the APPROACH score 0.19 ± 1.6; and for CE-SSFP -0.58 ± 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Quantification of MaR with CE-SSFP imaging following STEMI shows high correlation and low bias compared with angiographic scoring and supports its use as a reliable and practical method to determine myocardial salvage in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration information for the parent clinical trial: Karolinska Clinical Trial Registration (2008) Unique identifier: CT20080014. Registered 04(th) January 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5530997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55309972017-08-02 Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores De Palma, Rodney Sörensson, Peder Verouhis, Dinos Pernow, John Saleh, Nawzad J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction is predicted by final infarct size evaluated in relation to left ventricular myocardium at risk (MaR). Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is not widely used for assessing MaR. Evidence of its utility compared to traditional assessment methods and as a surrogate for clinical outcome is needed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis within a study evaluating post-conditioning during ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with coronary intervention (n = 78). CE-SSFP post-infarction was compared with angiographic jeopardy methods. Differences and variability between CMR and angiographic methods using Bland-Altman analyses were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared to MaR and extent of infarction. RESULTS: MaR showed correlation between CE-SSFP, and both BARI and APPROACH scores of 0.83 (p < 0.0001) and 0.84 (p < 0.0001) respectively. Bias between CE-SSFP and BARI was 1.1% (agreement limits -11.4 to +9.1). Bias between CE-SSFP and APPROACH was 1.2% (agreement limits -13 to +10.5). Inter-observer variability for the BARI score was 0.56 ± 2.9; 0.42 ± 2.1 for the APPROACH score; -1.4 ± 3.1% for CE-SSFP. Intra-observer variability was 0.15 ± 1.85 for the BARI score; for the APPROACH score 0.19 ± 1.6; and for CE-SSFP -0.58 ± 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Quantification of MaR with CE-SSFP imaging following STEMI shows high correlation and low bias compared with angiographic scoring and supports its use as a reliable and practical method to determine myocardial salvage in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration information for the parent clinical trial: Karolinska Clinical Trial Registration (2008) Unique identifier: CT20080014. Registered 04(th) January 2008 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5530997/ /pubmed/28750637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research De Palma, Rodney Sörensson, Peder Verouhis, Dinos Pernow, John Saleh, Nawzad Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title | Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title_full | Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title_fullStr | Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title_short | Quantification of myocardium at risk in ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
title_sort | quantification of myocardium at risk in st- elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with coronary angiographic jeopardy scores |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0359-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depalmarodney quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores AT sorenssonpeder quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores AT verouhisdinos quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores AT pernowjohn quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores AT salehnawzad quantificationofmyocardiumatriskinstelevationmyocardialinfarctionacomparisonofcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancewithcoronaryangiographicjeopardyscores |