Cargando…

Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinn Rød, Anne Marie, Harkestad, Nina, Jellestad, Finn Konow, Murison, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4
_version_ 1783253426470125568
author Kinn Rød, Anne Marie
Harkestad, Nina
Jellestad, Finn Konow
Murison, Robert
author_facet Kinn Rød, Anne Marie
Harkestad, Nina
Jellestad, Finn Konow
Murison, Robert
author_sort Kinn Rød, Anne Marie
collection PubMed
description Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55322912017-08-02 Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum Kinn Rød, Anne Marie Harkestad, Nina Jellestad, Finn Konow Murison, Robert Sci Rep Article Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5532291/ /pubmed/28751685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kinn Rød, Anne Marie
Harkestad, Nina
Jellestad, Finn Konow
Murison, Robert
Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_full Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_fullStr Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_short Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_sort comparison of commercial elisa assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kinnrødannemarie comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT harkestadnina comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT jellestadfinnkonow comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT murisonrobert comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum