Cargando…
Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4 |
_version_ | 1783253426470125568 |
---|---|
author | Kinn Rød, Anne Marie Harkestad, Nina Jellestad, Finn Konow Murison, Robert |
author_facet | Kinn Rød, Anne Marie Harkestad, Nina Jellestad, Finn Konow Murison, Robert |
author_sort | Kinn Rød, Anne Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5532291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55322912017-08-02 Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum Kinn Rød, Anne Marie Harkestad, Nina Jellestad, Finn Konow Murison, Robert Sci Rep Article Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5532291/ /pubmed/28751685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kinn Rød, Anne Marie Harkestad, Nina Jellestad, Finn Konow Murison, Robert Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title | Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title_full | Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title_fullStr | Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title_short | Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
title_sort | comparison of commercial elisa assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinnrødannemarie comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum AT harkestadnina comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum AT jellestadfinnkonow comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum AT murisonrobert comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum |