Cargando…
Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup?
Cyberbullying has been portrayed as a rising ‘epidemic’ amongst children and adolescents. But does it create many new victims beyond those already bullied with traditional means (physical, relational)? Our aim was to determine whether cyberbullying creates uniquely new victims, and whether it has si...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28188382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6 |
_version_ | 1783253454608662528 |
---|---|
author | Wolke, Dieter Lee, Kirsty Guy, Alexa |
author_facet | Wolke, Dieter Lee, Kirsty Guy, Alexa |
author_sort | Wolke, Dieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cyberbullying has been portrayed as a rising ‘epidemic’ amongst children and adolescents. But does it create many new victims beyond those already bullied with traditional means (physical, relational)? Our aim was to determine whether cyberbullying creates uniquely new victims, and whether it has similar impact upon psychological and behavioral outcomes for adolescents, beyond those experienced by traditional victims. This study assessed 2745 pupils, aged 11–16, from UK secondary schools. Pupils completed an electronic survey that measured bullying involvement, self-esteem and behavioral problems. Twenty-nine percent reported being bullied but only 1% of adolescents were pure cyber-victims (i.e., not also bullied traditionally). Compared to direct or relational victims, cyber-victimization had similar negative effects on behavior (z = −0.41) and self-esteem (z = −0.22) compared to those not involved in bullying. However, those bullied by multiple means (poly-victims) had the most difficulties with behavior (z = −0.94) and lowest self-esteem (z = −0.78). Cyberbullying creates few new victims, but is mainly a new tool to harm victims already bullied by traditional means. Cyberbullying extends the reach of bullying beyond the school gate. Intervention strategies against cyberbullying may need to include approaches against traditional bullying and its root causes to be successful. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5532410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55324102017-08-10 Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? Wolke, Dieter Lee, Kirsty Guy, Alexa Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Original Contribution Cyberbullying has been portrayed as a rising ‘epidemic’ amongst children and adolescents. But does it create many new victims beyond those already bullied with traditional means (physical, relational)? Our aim was to determine whether cyberbullying creates uniquely new victims, and whether it has similar impact upon psychological and behavioral outcomes for adolescents, beyond those experienced by traditional victims. This study assessed 2745 pupils, aged 11–16, from UK secondary schools. Pupils completed an electronic survey that measured bullying involvement, self-esteem and behavioral problems. Twenty-nine percent reported being bullied but only 1% of adolescents were pure cyber-victims (i.e., not also bullied traditionally). Compared to direct or relational victims, cyber-victimization had similar negative effects on behavior (z = −0.41) and self-esteem (z = −0.22) compared to those not involved in bullying. However, those bullied by multiple means (poly-victims) had the most difficulties with behavior (z = −0.94) and lowest self-esteem (z = −0.78). Cyberbullying creates few new victims, but is mainly a new tool to harm victims already bullied by traditional means. Cyberbullying extends the reach of bullying beyond the school gate. Intervention strategies against cyberbullying may need to include approaches against traditional bullying and its root causes to be successful. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-02-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5532410/ /pubmed/28188382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Wolke, Dieter Lee, Kirsty Guy, Alexa Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title | Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title_full | Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title_fullStr | Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title_short | Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
title_sort | cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28188382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolkedieter cyberbullyingastorminateacup AT leekirsty cyberbullyingastorminateacup AT guyalexa cyberbullyingastorminateacup |