Cargando…

Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate

PURPOSE: Sphincter-preserving operations performed with bladder-preserving surgery and a cystourethral anastomosis (CUA) do not require a urinary stoma, but leakage from the CUA may develop. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of performing an additional flap operation. METHODS: The s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noguchi, Keita, Nishizawa, Yuji, Komai, Yoshinobu, Sakai, Yasuyuki, Kobayasi, Akihiro, Ito, Masaaki, Saito, Norio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1484-z
_version_ 1783253455775727616
author Noguchi, Keita
Nishizawa, Yuji
Komai, Yoshinobu
Sakai, Yasuyuki
Kobayasi, Akihiro
Ito, Masaaki
Saito, Norio
author_facet Noguchi, Keita
Nishizawa, Yuji
Komai, Yoshinobu
Sakai, Yasuyuki
Kobayasi, Akihiro
Ito, Masaaki
Saito, Norio
author_sort Noguchi, Keita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Sphincter-preserving operations performed with bladder-preserving surgery and a cystourethral anastomosis (CUA) do not require a urinary stoma, but leakage from the CUA may develop. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of performing an additional flap operation. METHODS: The subjects were 39 patients who underwent bladder-preserving surgery for advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate, between 2001 and 2015.32 of whom had a CUA and one of whom had a neobladder. Five of these 32 patients underwent an ileal flap operation, 2 underwent an omental flap operation, and 3 underwent an operation using both flaps. RESULTS: Leakage developed in 3 (30%) of the 10 patients who underwent additional flap operations, but in 14 (60.9%) of the 23 patients who did not undergo a flap operation. The mean periods of catheterization for the patients who suffered leakage were 31 weeks (8–108 weeks) in those without a flap and 16 weeks (8–20 weeks) in those with a flap. Four (33.3%) of the 12 patients with leakage after surgery without a flap had a period of urinary catheterization >30 weeks, and 2 (16.7%) had leakage of CTCAE grade 3. There were no cases of leakage after flap surgery. CONCLUSION: An additional flap operation may decrease the risk of leakage from a CUA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55324152017-08-10 Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate Noguchi, Keita Nishizawa, Yuji Komai, Yoshinobu Sakai, Yasuyuki Kobayasi, Akihiro Ito, Masaaki Saito, Norio Surg Today Original Article PURPOSE: Sphincter-preserving operations performed with bladder-preserving surgery and a cystourethral anastomosis (CUA) do not require a urinary stoma, but leakage from the CUA may develop. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of performing an additional flap operation. METHODS: The subjects were 39 patients who underwent bladder-preserving surgery for advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate, between 2001 and 2015.32 of whom had a CUA and one of whom had a neobladder. Five of these 32 patients underwent an ileal flap operation, 2 underwent an omental flap operation, and 3 underwent an operation using both flaps. RESULTS: Leakage developed in 3 (30%) of the 10 patients who underwent additional flap operations, but in 14 (60.9%) of the 23 patients who did not undergo a flap operation. The mean periods of catheterization for the patients who suffered leakage were 31 weeks (8–108 weeks) in those without a flap and 16 weeks (8–20 weeks) in those with a flap. Four (33.3%) of the 12 patients with leakage after surgery without a flap had a period of urinary catheterization >30 weeks, and 2 (16.7%) had leakage of CTCAE grade 3. There were no cases of leakage after flap surgery. CONCLUSION: An additional flap operation may decrease the risk of leakage from a CUA. Springer Japan 2017-03-04 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5532415/ /pubmed/28260135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1484-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Noguchi, Keita
Nishizawa, Yuji
Komai, Yoshinobu
Sakai, Yasuyuki
Kobayasi, Akihiro
Ito, Masaaki
Saito, Norio
Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title_full Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title_fullStr Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title_short Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
title_sort efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28260135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1484-z
work_keys_str_mv AT noguchikeita efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT nishizawayuji efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT komaiyoshinobu efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT sakaiyasuyuki efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT kobayasiakihiro efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT itomasaaki efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate
AT saitonorio efficacyofanadditionalflapoperationinbladderpreservingsurgerywithradicalprostatectomyandcystourethralanastomosisforrectalcancerinvolvingtheprostate