Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison

This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among chi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Alain, Ayyagari, Rajeev, Xie, Meng, Cai, Sean, Xie, Jipan, Huss, Michael, Sikirica, Vanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6
_version_ 1783253456243392512
author Joseph, Alain
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Xie, Meng
Cai, Sean
Xie, Jipan
Huss, Michael
Sikirica, Vanja
author_facet Joseph, Alain
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Xie, Meng
Cai, Sean
Xie, Jipan
Huss, Michael
Sikirica, Vanja
author_sort Joseph, Alain
collection PubMed
description This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among children and adolescents with ADHD. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare change in symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) response, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Thirty-six RCTs were included in the analysis. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) ADHD-RS-IV total score change from baseline (active minus placebo) was −14.98 (−17.14, −12.80) for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), −9.33 (−11.63, −7.04) for methylphenidate (MPH) extended release, −8.68 (−10.63, −6.72) for guanfacine extended release (GXR), and −6.88 (−8.22, −5.49) for atomoxetine (ATX); data were unavailable for MPH immediate release. The relative risk (95% CrI) for CGI-I response (active versus placebo) was 2.56 (2.21, 2.91) for LDX, 2.13 (1.70, 2.54) for MPH extended release, 1.94 (1.59, 2.29) for GXR, 1.77 (1.31, 2.26) for ATX, and 1.62 (1.05, 2.17) for MPH immediate release. Among non-stimulant pharmacotherapies, GXR was more effective than ATX when comparing ADHD-RS-IV total score change (with a posterior probability of 93.91%) and CGI-I response (posterior probability 76.13%). This study found that LDX had greater efficacy than GXR, ATX, and MPH in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD. GXR had a high posterior probability of being more efficacious than ATX, although their CrIs overlapped. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55324172017-08-10 Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison Joseph, Alain Ayyagari, Rajeev Xie, Meng Cai, Sean Xie, Jipan Huss, Michael Sikirica, Vanja Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among children and adolescents with ADHD. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare change in symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) response, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Thirty-six RCTs were included in the analysis. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) ADHD-RS-IV total score change from baseline (active minus placebo) was −14.98 (−17.14, −12.80) for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), −9.33 (−11.63, −7.04) for methylphenidate (MPH) extended release, −8.68 (−10.63, −6.72) for guanfacine extended release (GXR), and −6.88 (−8.22, −5.49) for atomoxetine (ATX); data were unavailable for MPH immediate release. The relative risk (95% CrI) for CGI-I response (active versus placebo) was 2.56 (2.21, 2.91) for LDX, 2.13 (1.70, 2.54) for MPH extended release, 1.94 (1.59, 2.29) for GXR, 1.77 (1.31, 2.26) for ATX, and 1.62 (1.05, 2.17) for MPH immediate release. Among non-stimulant pharmacotherapies, GXR was more effective than ATX when comparing ADHD-RS-IV total score change (with a posterior probability of 93.91%) and CGI-I response (posterior probability 76.13%). This study found that LDX had greater efficacy than GXR, ATX, and MPH in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD. GXR had a high posterior probability of being more efficacious than ATX, although their CrIs overlapped. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5532417/ /pubmed/28258319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Joseph, Alain
Ayyagari, Rajeev
Xie, Meng
Cai, Sean
Xie, Jipan
Huss, Michael
Sikirica, Vanja
Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6
work_keys_str_mv AT josephalain comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT ayyagarirajeev comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT xiemeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT caisean comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT xiejipan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT hussmichael comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison
AT sikiricavanja comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison