Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison
This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among chi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6 |
_version_ | 1783253456243392512 |
---|---|
author | Joseph, Alain Ayyagari, Rajeev Xie, Meng Cai, Sean Xie, Jipan Huss, Michael Sikirica, Vanja |
author_facet | Joseph, Alain Ayyagari, Rajeev Xie, Meng Cai, Sean Xie, Jipan Huss, Michael Sikirica, Vanja |
author_sort | Joseph, Alain |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among children and adolescents with ADHD. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare change in symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) response, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Thirty-six RCTs were included in the analysis. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) ADHD-RS-IV total score change from baseline (active minus placebo) was −14.98 (−17.14, −12.80) for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), −9.33 (−11.63, −7.04) for methylphenidate (MPH) extended release, −8.68 (−10.63, −6.72) for guanfacine extended release (GXR), and −6.88 (−8.22, −5.49) for atomoxetine (ATX); data were unavailable for MPH immediate release. The relative risk (95% CrI) for CGI-I response (active versus placebo) was 2.56 (2.21, 2.91) for LDX, 2.13 (1.70, 2.54) for MPH extended release, 1.94 (1.59, 2.29) for GXR, 1.77 (1.31, 2.26) for ATX, and 1.62 (1.05, 2.17) for MPH immediate release. Among non-stimulant pharmacotherapies, GXR was more effective than ATX when comparing ADHD-RS-IV total score change (with a posterior probability of 93.91%) and CGI-I response (posterior probability 76.13%). This study found that LDX had greater efficacy than GXR, ATX, and MPH in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD. GXR had a high posterior probability of being more efficacious than ATX, although their CrIs overlapped. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5532417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55324172017-08-10 Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison Joseph, Alain Ayyagari, Rajeev Xie, Meng Cai, Sean Xie, Jipan Huss, Michael Sikirica, Vanja Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents 6–17 years of age. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacologic monotherapies among children and adolescents with ADHD. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare change in symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) response, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Thirty-six RCTs were included in the analysis. The mean (95% credible interval [CrI]) ADHD-RS-IV total score change from baseline (active minus placebo) was −14.98 (−17.14, −12.80) for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), −9.33 (−11.63, −7.04) for methylphenidate (MPH) extended release, −8.68 (−10.63, −6.72) for guanfacine extended release (GXR), and −6.88 (−8.22, −5.49) for atomoxetine (ATX); data were unavailable for MPH immediate release. The relative risk (95% CrI) for CGI-I response (active versus placebo) was 2.56 (2.21, 2.91) for LDX, 2.13 (1.70, 2.54) for MPH extended release, 1.94 (1.59, 2.29) for GXR, 1.77 (1.31, 2.26) for ATX, and 1.62 (1.05, 2.17) for MPH immediate release. Among non-stimulant pharmacotherapies, GXR was more effective than ATX when comparing ADHD-RS-IV total score change (with a posterior probability of 93.91%) and CGI-I response (posterior probability 76.13%). This study found that LDX had greater efficacy than GXR, ATX, and MPH in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD. GXR had a high posterior probability of being more efficacious than ATX, although their CrIs overlapped. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5532417/ /pubmed/28258319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Joseph, Alain Ayyagari, Rajeev Xie, Meng Cai, Sean Xie, Jipan Huss, Michael Sikirica, Vanja Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0962-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephalain comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT ayyagarirajeev comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT xiemeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT caisean comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT xiejipan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT hussmichael comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison AT sikiricavanja comparativeefficacyandsafetyofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpharmacotherapiesincludingguanfacineextendedreleaseamixedtreatmentcomparison |