Cargando…

Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the management of choice for renal stones 20 mm or smaller, with a stone clearance rate of up to 89%. The purpose of the present is to investigate the efficacy of a commercialised ESWL service, being performed as an outsourced treatment usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard, Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8
_version_ 1783253517949992960
author Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
author_facet Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
author_sort Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the management of choice for renal stones 20 mm or smaller, with a stone clearance rate of up to 89%. The purpose of the present is to investigate the efficacy of a commercialised ESWL service, being performed as an outsourced treatment using a mobile lithotripsy system on an outpatient basis. Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the risk of needing treatment with an internal ureteral double-J stent (JJ) after ESWL treatment. METHODS: During an eight-year period, 461 patients with a total of 589 renal stones were treated using a mobile lithotripsy system at a single Danish institution. A commercial company performed all treatments using a Storz Modulith SLK® system. Each stone was prospectively registered according to size, intra renal location and the presence of a JJ at the time of treatment. The number of required ESWL treatments and auxiliary procedures were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate after the initial ESWL procedure was 69%, which increased to an overall success rate of 93% after repeated treatment. A negative correlation was found between stone size and the overall success rate (r = −0.2, p < 0.01). The upper calyx was associated with a significantly better success rate, but otherwise intra renal stone location was not predictive for treatment success. A total of 17 patients (2.9%) required treatment with a JJ after the ESWL procedure. No significant difference was observed between the stone size or intra renal location and the risk of needing treatment with JJ after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: Commercialised ESWL treatment can achieve an overall success rate of more than 90% using a mobile lithotripsy system. As expected, an inverse relation between stone size and success rate was found. Patients who do not require treatment with a JJ prior to ESWL will only rarely need treatment with a JJ after ESWL, irrespective of stone size and intra renal stone location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55327612017-08-02 Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the management of choice for renal stones 20 mm or smaller, with a stone clearance rate of up to 89%. The purpose of the present is to investigate the efficacy of a commercialised ESWL service, being performed as an outsourced treatment using a mobile lithotripsy system on an outpatient basis. Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the risk of needing treatment with an internal ureteral double-J stent (JJ) after ESWL treatment. METHODS: During an eight-year period, 461 patients with a total of 589 renal stones were treated using a mobile lithotripsy system at a single Danish institution. A commercial company performed all treatments using a Storz Modulith SLK® system. Each stone was prospectively registered according to size, intra renal location and the presence of a JJ at the time of treatment. The number of required ESWL treatments and auxiliary procedures were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate after the initial ESWL procedure was 69%, which increased to an overall success rate of 93% after repeated treatment. A negative correlation was found between stone size and the overall success rate (r = −0.2, p < 0.01). The upper calyx was associated with a significantly better success rate, but otherwise intra renal stone location was not predictive for treatment success. A total of 17 patients (2.9%) required treatment with a JJ after the ESWL procedure. No significant difference was observed between the stone size or intra renal location and the risk of needing treatment with JJ after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: Commercialised ESWL treatment can achieve an overall success rate of more than 90% using a mobile lithotripsy system. As expected, an inverse relation between stone size and success rate was found. Patients who do not require treatment with a JJ prior to ESWL will only rarely need treatment with a JJ after ESWL, irrespective of stone size and intra renal stone location. BioMed Central 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5532761/ /pubmed/28750620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Tommy Kjærgaard
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title_full Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title_fullStr Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title_short Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
title_sort efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsentommykjærgaard efficacyofcommercialisedextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyserviceareviewof589renalstones
AT jensenjørgenbjerggaard efficacyofcommercialisedextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyserviceareviewof589renalstones