Cargando…

Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauber, Brett, Caloyeras, John, Posner, Joshua, Brommage, Deborah, Tzivelekis, Spiros, Pollock, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9
_version_ 1783253519127543808
author Hauber, Brett
Caloyeras, John
Posner, Joshua
Brommage, Deborah
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Pollock, Allan
author_facet Hauber, Brett
Caloyeras, John
Posner, Joshua
Brommage, Deborah
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Pollock, Allan
author_sort Hauber, Brett
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk preferences for the management of anemia associated with ESRD. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the tradeoffs patients are willing to make between cardiovascular risks associated with some anemia medicines and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. A secondary objective was to quantify the importance of avoiding transfusion-related risks. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed from the clinical literature, clinician input, patient-education resources, and a patient focus group. The survey instrument was qualitatively pretested before its administration to a broader sample of patients. The National Kidney Foundation invited individuals in the United States to participate in the survey. In a discrete-choice experiment (DCE), respondents chose between two hypothetical anemia medications in a series of questions. Each medication was defined by symptom relief, frequency of transfusions, cardiovascular risk, mode of administration, and out-of-pocket cost. The survey also included a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to quantify the importance of avoiding attributes of blood transfusions. Results from the DCE were used to estimate relative importance and marginal willingness to pay. Results from the BWS were converted to relative importance weights. RESULTS: A total of 200 individuals completed the survey. Patients were willing to accept a 6% medication-related risk of heart attack to avoid having two RBC transfusions per month. Symptom relief and mode of administration were of moderate importance. The most important transfusion-related risk to avoid was transfusion-related lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD and anemia have measurable treatment preferences and are willing to accept risks associated with anemia medications to avoid transfusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55327662017-08-02 Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia Hauber, Brett Caloyeras, John Posner, Joshua Brommage, Deborah Tzivelekis, Spiros Pollock, Allan BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk preferences for the management of anemia associated with ESRD. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the tradeoffs patients are willing to make between cardiovascular risks associated with some anemia medicines and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. A secondary objective was to quantify the importance of avoiding transfusion-related risks. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed from the clinical literature, clinician input, patient-education resources, and a patient focus group. The survey instrument was qualitatively pretested before its administration to a broader sample of patients. The National Kidney Foundation invited individuals in the United States to participate in the survey. In a discrete-choice experiment (DCE), respondents chose between two hypothetical anemia medications in a series of questions. Each medication was defined by symptom relief, frequency of transfusions, cardiovascular risk, mode of administration, and out-of-pocket cost. The survey also included a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to quantify the importance of avoiding attributes of blood transfusions. Results from the DCE were used to estimate relative importance and marginal willingness to pay. Results from the BWS were converted to relative importance weights. RESULTS: A total of 200 individuals completed the survey. Patients were willing to accept a 6% medication-related risk of heart attack to avoid having two RBC transfusions per month. Symptom relief and mode of administration were of moderate importance. The most important transfusion-related risk to avoid was transfusion-related lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD and anemia have measurable treatment preferences and are willing to accept risks associated with anemia medications to avoid transfusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5532766/ /pubmed/28750609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hauber, Brett
Caloyeras, John
Posner, Joshua
Brommage, Deborah
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Pollock, Allan
Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title_full Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title_fullStr Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title_full_unstemmed Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title_short Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
title_sort hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hauberbrett hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia
AT caloyerasjohn hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia
AT posnerjoshua hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia
AT brommagedeborah hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia
AT tzivelekisspiros hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia
AT pollockallan hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia