Cargando…
Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9 |
_version_ | 1783253519127543808 |
---|---|
author | Hauber, Brett Caloyeras, John Posner, Joshua Brommage, Deborah Tzivelekis, Spiros Pollock, Allan |
author_facet | Hauber, Brett Caloyeras, John Posner, Joshua Brommage, Deborah Tzivelekis, Spiros Pollock, Allan |
author_sort | Hauber, Brett |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk preferences for the management of anemia associated with ESRD. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the tradeoffs patients are willing to make between cardiovascular risks associated with some anemia medicines and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. A secondary objective was to quantify the importance of avoiding transfusion-related risks. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed from the clinical literature, clinician input, patient-education resources, and a patient focus group. The survey instrument was qualitatively pretested before its administration to a broader sample of patients. The National Kidney Foundation invited individuals in the United States to participate in the survey. In a discrete-choice experiment (DCE), respondents chose between two hypothetical anemia medications in a series of questions. Each medication was defined by symptom relief, frequency of transfusions, cardiovascular risk, mode of administration, and out-of-pocket cost. The survey also included a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to quantify the importance of avoiding attributes of blood transfusions. Results from the DCE were used to estimate relative importance and marginal willingness to pay. Results from the BWS were converted to relative importance weights. RESULTS: A total of 200 individuals completed the survey. Patients were willing to accept a 6% medication-related risk of heart attack to avoid having two RBC transfusions per month. Symptom relief and mode of administration were of moderate importance. The most important transfusion-related risk to avoid was transfusion-related lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD and anemia have measurable treatment preferences and are willing to accept risks associated with anemia medications to avoid transfusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5532766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55327662017-08-02 Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia Hauber, Brett Caloyeras, John Posner, Joshua Brommage, Deborah Tzivelekis, Spiros Pollock, Allan BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient engagement in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is expected to result in a more patient-centered approach to care that aligns with patients’ values, preferences, and goals for treatment. Nevertheless, no previous studies of which we are aware have evaluated patients’ benefit-risk preferences for the management of anemia associated with ESRD. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the tradeoffs patients are willing to make between cardiovascular risks associated with some anemia medicines and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. A secondary objective was to quantify the importance of avoiding transfusion-related risks. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed from the clinical literature, clinician input, patient-education resources, and a patient focus group. The survey instrument was qualitatively pretested before its administration to a broader sample of patients. The National Kidney Foundation invited individuals in the United States to participate in the survey. In a discrete-choice experiment (DCE), respondents chose between two hypothetical anemia medications in a series of questions. Each medication was defined by symptom relief, frequency of transfusions, cardiovascular risk, mode of administration, and out-of-pocket cost. The survey also included a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to quantify the importance of avoiding attributes of blood transfusions. Results from the DCE were used to estimate relative importance and marginal willingness to pay. Results from the BWS were converted to relative importance weights. RESULTS: A total of 200 individuals completed the survey. Patients were willing to accept a 6% medication-related risk of heart attack to avoid having two RBC transfusions per month. Symptom relief and mode of administration were of moderate importance. The most important transfusion-related risk to avoid was transfusion-related lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD and anemia have measurable treatment preferences and are willing to accept risks associated with anemia medications to avoid transfusions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5532766/ /pubmed/28750609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hauber, Brett Caloyeras, John Posner, Joshua Brommage, Deborah Tzivelekis, Spiros Pollock, Allan Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title | Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title_full | Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title_fullStr | Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title_short | Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
title_sort | hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hauberbrett hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia AT caloyerasjohn hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia AT posnerjoshua hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia AT brommagedeborah hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia AT tzivelekisspiros hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia AT pollockallan hemodialysispatientspreferencesforthemanagementofanemia |