Cargando…

Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary investigative modality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and there are established guidelines for the initial CT (CT-1). There are no specific guidelines for scheduling repeat CT in TBI. This study was carried out to compare the usefulness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Jayun M., Shah, Kairav S., Kumar, Jinendra, Sundaram, Ponraj K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761517
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.180968
_version_ 1783253542392299520
author Shah, Jayun M.
Shah, Kairav S.
Kumar, Jinendra
Sundaram, Ponraj K.
author_facet Shah, Jayun M.
Shah, Kairav S.
Kumar, Jinendra
Sundaram, Ponraj K.
author_sort Shah, Jayun M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary investigative modality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and there are established guidelines for the initial CT (CT-1). There are no specific guidelines for scheduling repeat CT in TBI. This study was carried out to compare the usefulness of unscheduled repeat CT (UCT-2) with scheduled repeat CT (SCT-2) in the presence or absence of neurological deterioration and to identify risk factors associated with radiological worsening (RW). METHODS: This prospective study comprised admitted patients with mild and moderate TBI between February and May, 2014 and all patients were subjected to repeat CT brain. Patients with penetrating brain injuries and surgical conditions after CT-1, and age < 5 years were excluded. Positive yield after the second CT (SCT-2 and UCT-2) leading to modification of management were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, 214 patients (214/222) underwent SCT-2 and 8 underwent UCT-2 (8/222). Surgery was required in 2 (0.9%) from the first group and 7 (87.5%) in the latter. UCT-2 was more likely to show RW warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2 (P < 0.05). In the SCT-2 group, CT-1 had been done within 2 h after trauma in 30 patients and 8 (8/30; 26.7%) showed RW and; after 2 h in the remaining 184 (184/214) with RW seen in 23 (23/184; 12.5%). RW was more common when the CT-1 was within 2 h from trauma (P < 0.05). In our study, the age of the patient and admission Glasgow Coma Scores did not significantly affect the findings in repeat CT. CONCLUSION: Repeating CT brain is costly besides needing significant logistical support to shift an injured and often unstable patient. SCT-2 is more likely to show RW when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma. UCT-2 is more likely to show RW and findings warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2. Hence, a repeat CT may be preferred only in the presence of clinical worsening and when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55329242017-07-31 Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study Shah, Jayun M. Shah, Kairav S. Kumar, Jinendra Sundaram, Ponraj K. Asian J Neurosurg Original Article BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary investigative modality for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and there are established guidelines for the initial CT (CT-1). There are no specific guidelines for scheduling repeat CT in TBI. This study was carried out to compare the usefulness of unscheduled repeat CT (UCT-2) with scheduled repeat CT (SCT-2) in the presence or absence of neurological deterioration and to identify risk factors associated with radiological worsening (RW). METHODS: This prospective study comprised admitted patients with mild and moderate TBI between February and May, 2014 and all patients were subjected to repeat CT brain. Patients with penetrating brain injuries and surgical conditions after CT-1, and age < 5 years were excluded. Positive yield after the second CT (SCT-2 and UCT-2) leading to modification of management were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, 214 patients (214/222) underwent SCT-2 and 8 underwent UCT-2 (8/222). Surgery was required in 2 (0.9%) from the first group and 7 (87.5%) in the latter. UCT-2 was more likely to show RW warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2 (P < 0.05). In the SCT-2 group, CT-1 had been done within 2 h after trauma in 30 patients and 8 (8/30; 26.7%) showed RW and; after 2 h in the remaining 184 (184/214) with RW seen in 23 (23/184; 12.5%). RW was more common when the CT-1 was within 2 h from trauma (P < 0.05). In our study, the age of the patient and admission Glasgow Coma Scores did not significantly affect the findings in repeat CT. CONCLUSION: Repeating CT brain is costly besides needing significant logistical support to shift an injured and often unstable patient. SCT-2 is more likely to show RW when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma. UCT-2 is more likely to show RW and findings warranting surgery as compared to SCT-2. Hence, a repeat CT may be preferred only in the presence of clinical worsening and when CT-1 is done within 2 h after trauma. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5532924/ /pubmed/28761517 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.180968 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shah, Jayun M.
Shah, Kairav S.
Kumar, Jinendra
Sundaram, Ponraj K.
Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title_full Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title_fullStr Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title_short Role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: A prospective study
title_sort role of routine repeat computed tomography of brain in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury: a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28761517
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.180968
work_keys_str_mv AT shahjayunm roleofroutinerepeatcomputedtomographyofbraininpatientswithmildandmoderatetraumaticbraininjuryaprospectivestudy
AT shahkairavs roleofroutinerepeatcomputedtomographyofbraininpatientswithmildandmoderatetraumaticbraininjuryaprospectivestudy
AT kumarjinendra roleofroutinerepeatcomputedtomographyofbraininpatientswithmildandmoderatetraumaticbraininjuryaprospectivestudy
AT sundaramponrajk roleofroutinerepeatcomputedtomographyofbraininpatientswithmildandmoderatetraumaticbraininjuryaprospectivestudy