Cargando…

The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based screening for aneuploidies offered through primary obstetrical care providers to a general pregnancy population. METHODS: Patient educational materials were developed and validated and providers were trained. Serum was collecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palomaki, Glenn E., Kloza, Edward M., O’Brien, Barbara M., Eklund, Elizabeth E., Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28079901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.194
_version_ 1783253550856404992
author Palomaki, Glenn E.
Kloza, Edward M.
O’Brien, Barbara M.
Eklund, Elizabeth E.
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
author_facet Palomaki, Glenn E.
Kloza, Edward M.
O’Brien, Barbara M.
Eklund, Elizabeth E.
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
author_sort Palomaki, Glenn E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based screening for aneuploidies offered through primary obstetrical care providers to a general pregnancy population. METHODS: Patient educational materials were developed and validated and providers were trained. Serum was collected for reflexive testing of cfDNA failures. Providers and patients were surveyed concerning knowledge, decision making, and satisfaction. Pregnancy outcome was determined by active or passive ascertainment. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and July 2015, 72 providers screened 2,691 women. The five largest participating practices increased uptake by 8 to 40%. Among 2,681 reports, 16 women (0.6%) were screen-positive for trisomy 21, 18, or 13; all saw genetic professionals. Twelve were confirmed (positive predictive value (PPV), 75%; 95% CI, 48–93%) and four were false-positives (0.15%). Of 150 failures (5.6%), 79% had a negative serum or subsequent cfDNA test; no aneuploidies were identified. Of 100 women surveyed, 99 understood that testing was optional, 96 had their questions answered, and 95 received sufficient information. Pretest information was provided by the physician/certified nurse midwife (55) or office nurse/educator (40); none was provided by genetic professionals. CONCLUSION: This first clinical utility study of cfDNA screening found higher uptake rates, patient understanding of basic concepts, and easy incorporation into routine obstetrical practices. There were no reported cases of aneuploidy among cfDNA test failures. Genet Med advance online publication 12 January 2017
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55329592017-12-02 The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population Palomaki, Glenn E. Kloza, Edward M. O’Brien, Barbara M. Eklund, Elizabeth E. Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M. Genet Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based screening for aneuploidies offered through primary obstetrical care providers to a general pregnancy population. METHODS: Patient educational materials were developed and validated and providers were trained. Serum was collected for reflexive testing of cfDNA failures. Providers and patients were surveyed concerning knowledge, decision making, and satisfaction. Pregnancy outcome was determined by active or passive ascertainment. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and July 2015, 72 providers screened 2,691 women. The five largest participating practices increased uptake by 8 to 40%. Among 2,681 reports, 16 women (0.6%) were screen-positive for trisomy 21, 18, or 13; all saw genetic professionals. Twelve were confirmed (positive predictive value (PPV), 75%; 95% CI, 48–93%) and four were false-positives (0.15%). Of 150 failures (5.6%), 79% had a negative serum or subsequent cfDNA test; no aneuploidies were identified. Of 100 women surveyed, 99 understood that testing was optional, 96 had their questions answered, and 95 received sufficient information. Pretest information was provided by the physician/certified nurse midwife (55) or office nurse/educator (40); none was provided by genetic professionals. CONCLUSION: This first clinical utility study of cfDNA screening found higher uptake rates, patient understanding of basic concepts, and easy incorporation into routine obstetrical practices. There were no reported cases of aneuploidy among cfDNA test failures. Genet Med advance online publication 12 January 2017 Nature Publishing Group 2017-07 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5532959/ /pubmed/28079901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.194 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Palomaki, Glenn E.
Kloza, Edward M.
O’Brien, Barbara M.
Eklund, Elizabeth E.
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title_full The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title_fullStr The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title_full_unstemmed The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title_short The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
title_sort clinical utility of dna-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28079901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.194
work_keys_str_mv AT palomakiglenne theclinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT klozaedwardm theclinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT obrienbarbaram theclinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT eklundelizabethe theclinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT lambertmesserliangeralynm theclinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT palomakiglenne clinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT klozaedwardm clinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT obrienbarbaram clinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT eklundelizabethe clinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation
AT lambertmesserliangeralynm clinicalutilityofdnabasedscreeningforfetalaneuploidybyprimaryobstetricalcareprovidersinthegeneralpregnancypopulation