Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Layland, Jamie, Rauhalammi, Samuli, Lee, Matthew M. Y., Ahmed, Nadeem, Carberry, Jaclyn, Teng Yue May, Vannesa, Watkins, Stuart, McComb, Christie, Mangion, Kenneth, McClure, John D., Carrick, David, O'Donnell, Anna, Sood, Arvind, McEntegart, Margaret, Oldroyd, Keith G., Radjenovic, Aleksandra, Berry, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759
_version_ 1783253558989160448
author Layland, Jamie
Rauhalammi, Samuli
Lee, Matthew M. Y.
Ahmed, Nadeem
Carberry, Jaclyn
Teng Yue May, Vannesa
Watkins, Stuart
McComb, Christie
Mangion, Kenneth
McClure, John D.
Carrick, David
O'Donnell, Anna
Sood, Arvind
McEntegart, Margaret
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Berry, Colin
author_facet Layland, Jamie
Rauhalammi, Samuli
Lee, Matthew M. Y.
Ahmed, Nadeem
Carberry, Jaclyn
Teng Yue May, Vannesa
Watkins, Stuart
McComb, Christie
Mangion, Kenneth
McClure, John D.
Carrick, David
O'Donnell, Anna
Sood, Arvind
McEntegart, Margaret
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Berry, Colin
author_sort Layland, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5532996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55329962017-08-14 Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Layland, Jamie Rauhalammi, Samuli Lee, Matthew M. Y. Ahmed, Nadeem Carberry, Jaclyn Teng Yue May, Vannesa Watkins, Stuart McComb, Christie Mangion, Kenneth McClure, John D. Carrick, David O'Donnell, Anna Sood, Arvind McEntegart, Margaret Oldroyd, Keith G. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Berry, Colin J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5532996/ /pubmed/28364045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Layland, Jamie
Rauhalammi, Samuli
Lee, Matthew M. Y.
Ahmed, Nadeem
Carberry, Jaclyn
Teng Yue May, Vannesa
Watkins, Stuart
McComb, Christie
Mangion, Kenneth
McClure, John D.
Carrick, David
O'Donnell, Anna
Sood, Arvind
McEntegart, Margaret
Oldroyd, Keith G.
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Berry, Colin
Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of 3.0‐t magnetic resonance t1 and t2 mapping and t2‐weighted dark‐blood imaging for the infarct‐related coronary artery in non–st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759
work_keys_str_mv AT laylandjamie diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT rauhalammisamuli diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT leematthewmy diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT ahmednadeem diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT carberryjaclyn diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT tengyuemayvannesa diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT watkinsstuart diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mccombchristie diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mangionkenneth diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mcclurejohnd diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT carrickdavid diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT odonnellanna diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT soodarvind diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mcentegartmargaret diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT oldroydkeithg diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT radjenovicaleksandra diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT berrycolin diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction