Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759 |
_version_ | 1783253558989160448 |
---|---|
author | Layland, Jamie Rauhalammi, Samuli Lee, Matthew M. Y. Ahmed, Nadeem Carberry, Jaclyn Teng Yue May, Vannesa Watkins, Stuart McComb, Christie Mangion, Kenneth McClure, John D. Carrick, David O'Donnell, Anna Sood, Arvind McEntegart, Margaret Oldroyd, Keith G. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Berry, Colin |
author_facet | Layland, Jamie Rauhalammi, Samuli Lee, Matthew M. Y. Ahmed, Nadeem Carberry, Jaclyn Teng Yue May, Vannesa Watkins, Stuart McComb, Christie Mangion, Kenneth McClure, John D. Carrick, David O'Donnell, Anna Sood, Arvind McEntegart, Margaret Oldroyd, Keith G. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Berry, Colin |
author_sort | Layland, Jamie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5532996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55329962017-08-14 Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Layland, Jamie Rauhalammi, Samuli Lee, Matthew M. Y. Ahmed, Nadeem Carberry, Jaclyn Teng Yue May, Vannesa Watkins, Stuart McComb, Christie Mangion, Kenneth McClure, John D. Carrick, David O'Donnell, Anna Sood, Arvind McEntegart, Margaret Oldroyd, Keith G. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Berry, Colin J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5532996/ /pubmed/28364045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Layland, Jamie Rauhalammi, Samuli Lee, Matthew M. Y. Ahmed, Nadeem Carberry, Jaclyn Teng Yue May, Vannesa Watkins, Stuart McComb, Christie Mangion, Kenneth McClure, John D. Carrick, David O'Donnell, Anna Sood, Arvind McEntegart, Margaret Oldroyd, Keith G. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Berry, Colin Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0‐T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2‐Weighted Dark‐Blood Imaging for the Infarct‐Related Coronary Artery in Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of 3.0‐t magnetic resonance t1 and t2 mapping and t2‐weighted dark‐blood imaging for the infarct‐related coronary artery in non–st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laylandjamie diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT rauhalammisamuli diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT leematthewmy diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT ahmednadeem diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT carberryjaclyn diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT tengyuemayvannesa diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT watkinsstuart diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mccombchristie diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mangionkenneth diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mcclurejohnd diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT carrickdavid diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT odonnellanna diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT soodarvind diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mcentegartmargaret diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT oldroydkeithg diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT radjenovicaleksandra diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT berrycolin diagnosticaccuracyof30tmagneticresonancet1andt2mappingandt2weighteddarkbloodimagingfortheinfarctrelatedcoronaryarteryinnonstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction |