Cargando…

Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits from His bundle pacing (HBP) in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are still inconclusive. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of permanent HBP in atrial fibrillation patients with narrow QRS who underwent atrioventri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Weijian, Su, Lan, Wu, Shengjie, Xu, Lei, Xiao, Fangyi, Zhou, Xiaohong, Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005309
_version_ 1783253564648325120
author Huang, Weijian
Su, Lan
Wu, Shengjie
Xu, Lei
Xiao, Fangyi
Zhou, Xiaohong
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
author_facet Huang, Weijian
Su, Lan
Wu, Shengjie
Xu, Lei
Xiao, Fangyi
Zhou, Xiaohong
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
author_sort Huang, Weijian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits from His bundle pacing (HBP) in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are still inconclusive. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of permanent HBP in atrial fibrillation patients with narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure symptoms despite rate control by medication. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study enrolled 52 consecutive heart failure patients who underwent attempted atrioventricular node ablation and HBP for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension, New York Heart Association classification and use of diuretics for heart failure were assessed during follow‐up visits after permanent HBP. Of 52 patients, 42 patients (80.8%) received permanent HBP and atrioventricular node ablation with a median 20‐month follow‐up. There was no significant change between native and paced QRS duration (107.1±25.8 versus 105.3±23.9 milliseconds, P=0.07). Left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension decreased from the baseline (P<0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction increased from baseline (P<0.001) in patients with a greater improvement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients (N=20) than in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients (N=22). New York Heart Association classification improved from a baseline 2.9±0.6 to 1.4±0.4 after HBP in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients and from a baseline 2.7±0.6 to 1.4±0.5 after HBP in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. After 1 year of HBP, the numbers of patients who used diuretics for heart failure decreased significantly (P<0.001) when compared to the baseline diuretics use. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent HBP post–atrioventricular node ablation significantly improved echocardiographic measurements and New York Heart Association classification and reduced diuretics use for heart failure management in atrial fibrillation patients with narrow QRS who suffered from heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5533020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55330202017-08-14 Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Huang, Weijian Su, Lan Wu, Shengjie Xu, Lei Xiao, Fangyi Zhou, Xiaohong Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits from His bundle pacing (HBP) in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are still inconclusive. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of permanent HBP in atrial fibrillation patients with narrow QRS who underwent atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure symptoms despite rate control by medication. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study enrolled 52 consecutive heart failure patients who underwent attempted atrioventricular node ablation and HBP for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension, New York Heart Association classification and use of diuretics for heart failure were assessed during follow‐up visits after permanent HBP. Of 52 patients, 42 patients (80.8%) received permanent HBP and atrioventricular node ablation with a median 20‐month follow‐up. There was no significant change between native and paced QRS duration (107.1±25.8 versus 105.3±23.9 milliseconds, P=0.07). Left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension decreased from the baseline (P<0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction increased from baseline (P<0.001) in patients with a greater improvement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients (N=20) than in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients (N=22). New York Heart Association classification improved from a baseline 2.9±0.6 to 1.4±0.4 after HBP in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients and from a baseline 2.7±0.6 to 1.4±0.5 after HBP in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. After 1 year of HBP, the numbers of patients who used diuretics for heart failure decreased significantly (P<0.001) when compared to the baseline diuretics use. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent HBP post–atrioventricular node ablation significantly improved echocardiographic measurements and New York Heart Association classification and reduced diuretics use for heart failure management in atrial fibrillation patients with narrow QRS who suffered from heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5533020/ /pubmed/28365568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005309 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Huang, Weijian
Su, Lan
Wu, Shengjie
Xu, Lei
Xiao, Fangyi
Zhou, Xiaohong
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title_full Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title_fullStr Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title_short Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
title_sort benefits of permanent his bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure with both preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005309
work_keys_str_mv AT huangweijian benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT sulan benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT wushengjie benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT xulei benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT xiaofangyi benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT zhouxiaohong benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction
AT ellenbogenkennetha benefitsofpermanenthisbundlepacingcombinedwithatrioventricularnodeablationinatrialfibrillationpatientswithheartfailurewithbothpreservedandreducedleftventricularejectionfraction