Cargando…

Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines

Introduction: Health technology assessment (HTA) in Poland supports reimbursement decisions via the Polish HTA Agency (AOTMiT), whose guidelines were updated in 2016. Methods: We identified key changes introduced by the update and, before guideline publication, analysed discrepancies between AOTMiT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lach, Krzysztof, Dziwisz, Michal, Rémuzat, Cécile, Toumi, Mondher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202
_version_ 1783253579234017280
author Lach, Krzysztof
Dziwisz, Michal
Rémuzat, Cécile
Toumi, Mondher
author_facet Lach, Krzysztof
Dziwisz, Michal
Rémuzat, Cécile
Toumi, Mondher
author_sort Lach, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Health technology assessment (HTA) in Poland supports reimbursement decisions via the Polish HTA Agency (AOTMiT), whose guidelines were updated in 2016. Methods: We identified key changes introduced by the update and, before guideline publication, analysed discrepancies between AOTMiT assessments and the submitting marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) to elucidate the context of the update. We compared the clarity and detail of the new guidelines versus those of the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Results: The update specified more precise requirements for items such as indirect comparison or input data for economic modelling. Agency–MAH discrepancies relating to the subjects of the HTA update were found in 14.6% of published documents. The new Polish HTA guidelines were as clear and detailed as NICE’s on topics such as assessing quality of evidence and economic modelling, but were less informative when describing (for example) pairwise meta-analysis. Conclusions: The Polish HTA guidelines update demonstrates lessons learned from internal and external experiences. The new guidelines adhere more closely to UK HTA standards, being clearer and more informative. While the update is expected to reduce Agency–MAH discrepancies, there remain areas for development, such as providing templates to aid HTA submissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5533121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55331212017-08-11 Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines Lach, Krzysztof Dziwisz, Michal Rémuzat, Cécile Toumi, Mondher J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Introduction: Health technology assessment (HTA) in Poland supports reimbursement decisions via the Polish HTA Agency (AOTMiT), whose guidelines were updated in 2016. Methods: We identified key changes introduced by the update and, before guideline publication, analysed discrepancies between AOTMiT assessments and the submitting marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) to elucidate the context of the update. We compared the clarity and detail of the new guidelines versus those of the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Results: The update specified more precise requirements for items such as indirect comparison or input data for economic modelling. Agency–MAH discrepancies relating to the subjects of the HTA update were found in 14.6% of published documents. The new Polish HTA guidelines were as clear and detailed as NICE’s on topics such as assessing quality of evidence and economic modelling, but were less informative when describing (for example) pairwise meta-analysis. Conclusions: The Polish HTA guidelines update demonstrates lessons learned from internal and external experiences. The new guidelines adhere more closely to UK HTA standards, being clearer and more informative. While the update is expected to reduce Agency–MAH discrepancies, there remain areas for development, such as providing templates to aid HTA submissions. Routledge 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5533121/ /pubmed/28804603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lach, Krzysztof
Dziwisz, Michal
Rémuzat, Cécile
Toumi, Mondher
Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title_full Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title_fullStr Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title_short Towards a more transparent HTA process in Poland: new Polish HTA methodological guidelines
title_sort towards a more transparent hta process in poland: new polish hta methodological guidelines
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202
work_keys_str_mv AT lachkrzysztof towardsamoretransparenthtaprocessinpolandnewpolishhtamethodologicalguidelines
AT dziwiszmichal towardsamoretransparenthtaprocessinpolandnewpolishhtamethodologicalguidelines
AT remuzatcecile towardsamoretransparenthtaprocessinpolandnewpolishhtamethodologicalguidelines
AT toumimondher towardsamoretransparenthtaprocessinpolandnewpolishhtamethodologicalguidelines