Cargando…
Balanced assessment systems revisited
In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190 |
_version_ | 1783253579502452736 |
---|---|
author | Dankó, Dávid Molnár, Márk Péter |
author_facet | Dankó, Dávid Molnár, Márk Péter |
author_sort | Dankó, Dávid |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive policy debate in the period since its publication but it has not been critically assessed in a structured form yet. This article aims to describe both the contributions and the weak spots of the original framework and to reflect on them with the intention of further developing the model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5533122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55331222017-08-11 Balanced assessment systems revisited Dankó, Dávid Molnár, Márk Péter J Mark Access Health Policy Practical Applications In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive policy debate in the period since its publication but it has not been critically assessed in a structured form yet. This article aims to describe both the contributions and the weak spots of the original framework and to reflect on them with the intention of further developing the model. Routledge 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5533122/ /pubmed/28804602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Practical Applications Dankó, Dávid Molnár, Márk Péter Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title | Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title_full | Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title_fullStr | Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title_short | Balanced assessment systems revisited |
title_sort | balanced assessment systems revisited |
topic | Practical Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dankodavid balancedassessmentsystemsrevisited AT molnarmarkpeter balancedassessmentsystemsrevisited |