Cargando…

Balanced assessment systems revisited

In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dankó, Dávid, Molnár, Márk Péter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190
_version_ 1783253579502452736
author Dankó, Dávid
Molnár, Márk Péter
author_facet Dankó, Dávid
Molnár, Márk Péter
author_sort Dankó, Dávid
collection PubMed
description In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive policy debate in the period since its publication but it has not been critically assessed in a structured form yet. This article aims to describe both the contributions and the weak spots of the original framework and to reflect on them with the intention of further developing the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5533122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55331222017-08-11 Balanced assessment systems revisited Dankó, Dávid Molnár, Márk Péter J Mark Access Health Policy Practical Applications In 2014, balanced assessment systems (BAS) were proposed as a resource-conscious, ‘fit-for-purpose’ form of health technology assessment for middle-income countries which lack resources and competences necessary for resource-intensive health technology assessment models. BAS has undergone extensive policy debate in the period since its publication but it has not been critically assessed in a structured form yet. This article aims to describe both the contributions and the weak spots of the original framework and to reflect on them with the intention of further developing the model. Routledge 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5533122/ /pubmed/28804602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Practical Applications
Dankó, Dávid
Molnár, Márk Péter
Balanced assessment systems revisited
title Balanced assessment systems revisited
title_full Balanced assessment systems revisited
title_fullStr Balanced assessment systems revisited
title_full_unstemmed Balanced assessment systems revisited
title_short Balanced assessment systems revisited
title_sort balanced assessment systems revisited
topic Practical Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355190
work_keys_str_mv AT dankodavid balancedassessmentsystemsrevisited
AT molnarmarkpeter balancedassessmentsystemsrevisited